Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness of Compromise of 1850 and Kansas-Nebraska Act - Essay Example

It was all again dependent on the “popular sovereignty.” As well as to resolve the territorial boundary between Texas and New Mexico; for this provision, the United States paid the Texas Republic $10 million to surrender its all territories to the federal government.

The second was the Utah provision which also acknowledged Utah as a federal state that had the same condition as New Mexico. The third was the Fugitive Slave provision that put all runaway slave cases under federal control, which obviously favorable to the slave owners. Lastly, it abolished the Slave Trading in Columbia which took effect on January 01, 1851. Although it brought peace and orders to some slave territories, many anti-slave people were not in favor of the provisions that were incorporated in the Compromise Act.

(Bauholz, 2011). Historically, the passage of the Compromise bill in 1850 had somewhat been able to trim down the tensions of the four-year ongoing issues over slavery that divided the United States before. The bill had some specific provisions. In general, the Compromise 1850 played a very important role in delaying the American Civil War for one decade. During that time, the US Northwest part was started to boom, as well as its economy had begun to grow and develop so as its population. Eventually, it had also started to set up a good relationship with the Northeast settlers.

On the other hand, the southern states had still unable to develop their economy, because of people’s lack of ability in industrialization, and the entire population was greatly dependent on slave labor and crop production. Despite the best effort made by lawmakers, slavery still remained the most controversial conflict in the United States. The “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” a novel written by Harriet Beecher Stowe even heightened the problems between pro-slave and anti-slavery territories.

Until such time that the federal government finally decided to dissolve the Compromise Act. (“Compromise of 1850,” n. d.)On the other hand, the Kansas-Nebraska Act drafted by Senator Stephen A. Douglas, passed by the U.S. Congress in May 1954, which gave people the prerogative to decide whether they want to continue the slavery system in the territories or not, and it was by the “popular sovereignty” or commonly known as the “rule of the people”. The US government thought that it would be the best solution to resolve the slavery conflicts among the citizens in various areas.