StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Evaluate the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of both the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
First Texas and Mexico provision, which admitted New Mexico as a territory without slavery ban. It was all again dependent on the…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
Evaluate the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of both the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Evaluate the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of both the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act"

Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness of “Compromise of 1850” and “Kansas-Nebraska Act” The Compromise of 1950 was a package of four bills that only provided temporary settlement to cut the ongoing slavery conflicts among territories. First Texas and Mexico provision, which admitted New Mexico as a territory without slavery ban. It was all again dependent on the “popular sovereignty.” As well as to resolve the territorial boundary between Texas and New Mexico; for this provision, the United States paid Texas Republic $10 million to surrender its all territories to the federal government. Second was the Utah provision which also acknowledged Utah as a federal state that had the same condition with New Mexico. Third was the Fugitive Slave provision that put all runaway slave cases under the federal control, which obviously favorable to the slave owners. Lastly it abolished the Slave Trading in Columbia which took effect on January 01, 1851. Although it brought peace and orders to some slave territories, many anti-slaves people were not in favor of the provisions that incorporated in the Compromise Act. (Bauholz, 2011).
Historically, the passage of Compromise bill in 1850 had somewhat able to trim down the tensions of the four-year on going issues over slavery that divided the United States before. The bill had some specific provisions. In general, the Compromise 1850 played a very important role in delaying the American Civil War for one decade. During that time, the US Northwest part was started to boom, as well as its economy had begun to grow and develop so as its population. Eventually, it had also started to set up a good relationship to the Northeast settlers. On the other hand, the southern states had still unable to develop their economy, because of people’s lack of ability in industrialization, and the entire population was greatly dependent of slave labor and crop production. Despite the best effort made by lawmakers, slavery still remained the most controversial conflicts in the United States. The “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” a novel written by Harriet Beecher Stowe even heightened the problems between pro-slave and anti-slavery territories. Until such time that the federal government finally decided to dissolve the Compromise Act. (“Compromise of 1850,” n. d.)
On the other hand, the Kansas-Nebraska Act drafted by Senator Stephen A. Douglas, passed by the U.S. Congress in May 1954, which gave people prerogative to decide whether they want to continue the slavery system in the territories or not, and it was by the “popular sovereignty” or commonly known as the “rule of the people”. The US government thought that it would be the best solution to resolve the slavery conflicts among the citizens in various areas. Nonetheless, it only resulted to opposite effect on the people in every territory. This provision just disoriented the settlers even more, and caused further violence and protests from anti slavery groups. This act totally opposed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which banned the slavery in the north Kansas for thirty years. (Bauholz, 2011). At that time, former Congressman Abraham Lincoln was among the people who strongly opposed any law that could extend slavery in the US territories. (McNamara, n.d.)
McNamara, (n.d.) has also noted the continuing disagreement between South and North over slavery issues led to establishment of two opposing governments within the Kansas territories. Subsequently, many humanitarian issues and injustices between slaves and their slave owners arose; and they caused an outbreak of protests and violence between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups which finally resulted to civil war in 1856. The region was later called the “bleeding Kansas” because of the horrible death of many people in Kansas over slavery conflict.
References:
Bauholz, H. (2011). What Led to the compromise of 1850 from the civil war. Ehow contributor.
http://www.ehow.com/info_8796075_led-compromise-1850-civil-war.html#ixzz1eLHJ6MNu
Compromise of 1850. (n.d.). Cliffs notes. Retrieve from
http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/Compromise-of-1850.topicArticleId-25073,articleId-25060.html
McNamara, R. (n. d.). The Kansas-Nebraska act: Legislation intended as a compromise
backfired and led to civil war. About.com.19th century history. Retrieved from http://history1800s.about.com/od/slaveryinamerica/a/KansasNebraska.htm Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Evaluate the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of both the Compromise Essay”, n.d.)
Evaluate the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of both the Compromise Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1585736-evaluate-the-effectiveness-or-ineffectiveness-of-both-the-compromise-of-1850-and-the-kansas-nebraska-act
(Evaluate the Effectiveness, or Ineffectiveness, of Both the Compromise Essay)
Evaluate the Effectiveness, or Ineffectiveness, of Both the Compromise Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1585736-evaluate-the-effectiveness-or-ineffectiveness-of-both-the-compromise-of-1850-and-the-kansas-nebraska-act.
“Evaluate the Effectiveness, or Ineffectiveness, of Both the Compromise Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1585736-evaluate-the-effectiveness-or-ineffectiveness-of-both-the-compromise-of-1850-and-the-kansas-nebraska-act.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Evaluate the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of both the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act

Comparision between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820)

...?Sur Comparison between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820) The Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) was initiated to organize the territories of Nebraska and Kansas. This was enacted by the House of Representatives and the senate of U.S.A in the assembled congress. The areas that are exempted from this act include the Missouri River, the east Utah territory boundary, the Rocky Mountains summit; the Missouri River on the southward boundary, Nebraska Territory created temporary government, the Minnesota territory on the western boundary. The act provided that not anything entailed in this in it shall be interpreted to hamper the United States government from partitioning... that...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

The Kansas-Nebraska Act

...?The Kansas-Nebraska Act The Kansas-Nebraska Act is one of the major governmental policies affected the Midwest as a region. This is a policy shift affected the Midwest prior to the Civil War. Southerners believe the idea in this policy shift would create Nebraska as a free soil, but Kansas would be open to slavery (Boyer 309). This eventually sparked storm of protest. This conflict eventually started from the full advocate of southerners to southern-based Pacific route instead of the Midwestern part. Then Nebraska was closer to region of slavery as it was situated north of the Missouri...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Compromise of 1850

...different interpretations placed upon it, the Compromise of 1850, in part, would seek to address the issue of slavery. As for its definition, "The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five bills that were intended to stave off sectional strife. Its goal was to deal with the spread of slavery to territories in order to keep northern and southern interests in balance," (Kelly, p.1). For the young nation, the hope would be to equalize the relations between both the northern region, as well as the south and enable both sides to come to the same respective unity. The discussion over slavery, would remain one of the more potentially...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

The Debate on the Compromise of 1850

..., as the central issue. But beyond the simple notion of slavery, both men agreed that the tensions were being promoted by abolitionists geared toward arousing anti-slavery feelings in the south. Webster was politically bound to show some public support for the Whig slave owners that he was courting for national support, while Calhoun needed anti-abolitionist support at home. Though the main issue of the Compromise of 1850 was the problem of the Texas territory and it's claim on New Mexico, neither man chose to highlight it in their speech. Another critical issue, the Fugitive Slave Act, was detailed by Webster but Calhoun chose to ignore the issue. Webster blamed the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Wilmot's Proviso and the Kansas-Nebraska Act

...Running Head: Wilmot’s Proviso and the Kansas-Nebraska Act Wilmot’s Proviso and the Kansas-Nebraska Act as causative factors for the Civil War Customer Name University Name Abstract This paper explores the causative factors of the Civil War that occurred in 1861-1865. Wilmot’s Proviso (1846) and the Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) are believed to have contributed heavily to the Civil War. This paper contains a comparative analysis of these two causes and their impacts on the people of the newly ceded territories. The aftermath of both Wilmot’s Proviso bill and Kansas-Nebraska Act has shown that both contributed heavily to the Civil War. Wilmot’s Proviso and the Kansas-Nebraska Act as causative factors for the Civil War The Civil War... that...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

The Compromise of 1850: the South and the North

...(Your Compromise 1850 The Compromise of 1850 was developed to be beneficial for both the South andthe North but it ended up being more beneficial for the North and the compromise was of very little benefit to the South (Boyer 400). The Compromise of 1850 was made to decrease the differences amongst the Southerners and the Northerners, but the compromise failed to achieve its purpose. The first major benefit obtained by the North was the admission of California as a free state (Richards 98). This provision was beneficial to the Northern regions because this provision increased the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Missouri Compromise

...the way for Missouri to join the Union as a slave state. To maintain the balance in the senate vote process, Maine was cleared to enter the Union at that time as a free state. In addition, the Compromise drew an imaginary line 36 Degrees 30 Minutes North Latitude, separating the new Louisiana into two regions, north and south. Regions at the north of the above mentioned line were free territories. In effect, African-Americans in these areas were officially free citizens. Strangely as it may be seem, the Compromise encouraged people from the free north to return escapee slaves to the south. The agreement also fell short of prohibiting slavery in the free territories. As time would...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Nebraska

...Erickson`s stages of Development in “Nebraska” by Alexander Payne by Erick Erikson retransformed the views on human psychological development by his works. He concentrated his efforts on creating the model of personality evolution. According to Erikson, each personality passes eight stages of development, each of which is characterized by certain crisis or conflict (Carducci, 2009). Resolving this conflict a person acquires new virtues necessary for personality formation and is able to pass to the next stage. Erikson considered that psychological development continued throughout the whole life span, and emphasized the necessity of adults` transformation as well (Aiken, 1998). After a child passes successfully his...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Charlatans, Cranks and Kansas

...Charlatans’ cranks and Kansas The governor of the Kansas Sam Brown came up with a proposal to slash large tax bypercentages. He did it without paying attention to the source of the lost revenues which could have been brought in by the taxes. This has had a great impact on the economy of Kansas leaving it lagging behind of the neighboring states and the country as a whole. In fact, the country is having deficits in its national budget. The cut of taxes has downplayed the economy of Kansas as it was predicted. This can be a lesson for other states with the power of bad ideas that serve the right people who are protected by the laws. The idea was deemed to fail owing to the...
1 Pages(250 words)Article

Bleeding Kansas

... The Harpers Ferry raid critically impacted the future of the abolition. It had once been subjugated by pacifist politics, but subsequent to October of 1859, determination and anger fused into a new militancy position that demanded an end to slavery. It was by any possible means, many felt violence as the necessities. John Brown left a significant mark on the South. The great Southern dread of a slave revolt was worsened by Browns try at Harpers Ferry. Subsequent to the raid, the Governor of Virginia, Henry A. Wise received numerous letters as well as telegrams alleging that bands of men were attacking the South (Tony 45). Doubtful people were imprisoned or driven out of town, books majoring on the South were openly burned... The Harpers...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Evaluate the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of both the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act for FREE!

Contact Us