StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Comparision between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820) - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Surname: Instructor: Course: Date: Comparison between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820) The Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) was initiated to organize the territories of Nebraska and Kansas…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.2% of users find it useful
Comparision between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Comparision between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820)"

Download file to see previous pages The act provided that not anything entailed in this in it shall be interpreted to hamper the United States government from partitioning the territory into two or more partitions in the manner in which the congress shall deem necessary, or inhibit the same government from attaching any portion of the Territory to any other Territory of U.S or State. The act makes further provisions to avoid insinuations that impair the right to property or person in relation to the Indians in the Territory provided the rights shall be not be extinguished by the treaty entered. This usually involves Indians and the United States or any other territory which is not to be included in the jurisdiction or the line of the territory without consent of the Indian tribe. In addition, all territories like that shall be accepted outside the boundaries and make up no section of the Nebraska Territory until the tribe itself signifies its assent to the United States’ President to be included in the Nebraska Territory. ...
Section two of Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) states that the authority and power of the executive over and in the Nebraska Territory shall be awarded to the Governor who shall be in that office for at least four years to the point at which his or her successor shall be qualified and appointed, unless the Governor is removed from the office by the United States’ President. The section entails that the Governor remains the commander in chief of the militia and reside within that territory thereof. Such Governors may grant respites and pardons for the offenses against the Territory’s stated laws as well as amnesty for offenses against the United States’ laws up to the point in which the decision of the President is made known. The Governor shall also have all officers appointed to the office commissioned under the laws of the Territory and see to it that the law is executed. On the other hand, section two of Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820) states that the mentioned state shall include the middle of river Mississippi, the parallel altitude of St. Francisco river, the meridian line cutting through the center of river Kansas mouth where it flows into river Missouri, the intersection of the latitude passing through rapids of Des Moines river, the section of river Des Moines that empties in to the river of Mississippi. This section majorly describes the boundaries in the said state. The section further provides that the state shall have a concomitant jurisdiction on the Mississippi river and any other river that boarders the state provided the rivers forms a universal boundary to the state and some other states formed and bounded by the said state. The section ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Comparision between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1447775-compare-two-primary-sources
(Comparision Between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/history/1447775-compare-two-primary-sources.
“Comparision Between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1447775-compare-two-primary-sources.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Comparision between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820)

The Missouri Compromise

...States as a result of Clay’s second negotiation. Missouri compromise did not succeed in ending the clash over slavery; instead, it gave a temporary pause. Addition of new provinces like California as a free state to the Union demanded new compromises with the issue of slavery. The Missouri compromise turned to be irrelevant in 1854 as a result of the introduction of Kansas- Nebraska Act which allowed the formation of two new slave states, Kansas and Nebraska6. Conclusion The Missouri compromise of 1820 possesses...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Patagonia Case Analysis

4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

The Kansas-Nebraska Act

...?The Kansas-Nebraska Act The Kansas-Nebraska Act is one of the major governmental policies affected the Midwest as a region. This is a policy shift affected the Midwest prior to the Civil War. Southerners believe the idea in this policy shift would create Nebraska as a free soil, but Kansas would be open to slavery (Boyer 309). This eventually sparked storm of protest. This conflict eventually started from the full advocate of southerners to southern-based Pacific route instead of the Midwestern part. Then Nebraska was closer to region of slavery as it was situated north of the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Down Freedom's Main Line

3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Jefferson's view about the Missouri Compromise

...Jeffersons View about the Missouri Compromise of 1820 The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was part of an ongoing attempt to divide the United s intotwo areas: one that was pro-slavery (the Southern territories) and one that was anti-slavery (the Northern territories). The Missouri Compromise was so called because it involved the admittance of the (proposed) Missouri state as one that was pro-slavery – it was accepted into the Union. Thomas Jefferson is famed for his disparaging remarks about the Missouri Compromise, describing it as a fire bell in the night...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Wilmot's Proviso and the Kansas-Nebraska Act

...Running Head: Wilmot’s Proviso and the Kansas-Nebraska Act Wilmot’s Proviso and the Kansas-Nebraska Act as causative factors for the Civil War Customer Name University Name Abstract This paper explores the causative factors of the Civil War that occurred in 1861-1865. Wilmot’s Proviso (1846) and the Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) are believed to have contributed heavily to the Civil War. This paper contains a comparative analysis of these two causes and their impacts on the people of the newly ceded territories. The aftermath of both Wilmot’s Proviso bill and Kansas-Nebraska Act has shown that both contributed heavily to the Civil War. Wilmot’s Proviso and the Kansas-Nebraska Act as causative factors for the Civil War The Civil War... that...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Evaluate the effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, of both the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act

...Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness of “Compromise of 1850” and “Kansas-Nebraska Act” The Compromise of 1950 was a package of four bills that only provided temporary settlement to cut the ongoing slavery conflicts among territories. First Texas and Mexico provision, which admitted New Mexico as a territory without slavery ban. It was all again dependent on the “popular sovereignty.” As well as to resolve the territorial boundary between Texas and New Mexico; for this provision, the United States paid Texas Republic $10 million to surrender its all territories to the federal government. Second was the Utah provision which also...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Missouri Compromise

...Due Missouri Compromise It is undeniable that the founding fathers of the United s of America as a nation upheld many ideals concerning inalienable rights of man, yet this was a fact that was not applicable to every citizen within its boarders. Even though the country came out strongly to oppose slavery   in the beginning of the 19th century, its history is punctuated with dirty events characterizing gross violation of fundamental human rights; freedom of choice in particular. The US was a diehard participant in slavery, more so of the African. Just a few years off the hook of colonialism, Americans had a lot in the plate to deal with for the young nation to progress to maturity. The period 1813 to...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Qualitative analysis using the transcript provided

...QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS USING THE TRANSCRIPT PROVIDED QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS USING THE TRANSCRIPT PROVIDED Introduction Community health workers have a lot of role to play in the promotion of health in the community. But according to the Council on Credentialing in Pharmacy (2013), as much as this role may have its own professional mandates, it is also important that service providers and service users have a say in the service they provide and receive respectively. It was against backdrop that the study was carried out to find what the views of a community healthcare provider on critical issues involved in the delivery of community health service. This was done to know how well what happens in practice...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Qualitative analysis using the transcript provided

...EXTRACT from a transcript of an INTERVIEW exploring the role of Community Health Workers in promoting health. (Interviewer questions are printed in bold). I = interviewer; P = participant I. Firstly could you tell me about your work as a Community Health Worker? P. So my role is a Community Health Worker in the district. I have the responsibility of going out into to the community and doing many different things such as training, raising awareness and trying to improve people’s health but, ah, you know, it is so very hard these days. There are so many things which people have to face and things are hard. It is difficult. I. It is difficult you say? P. Yes, um, yes it is. I. Can you explain why it is difficult? P. It...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Comparision between the Transcript of Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820) for FREE!

Contact Us