The Byzantine and Islamic systems pose a challenge in the attempt to classify them as either unique or adaptations of previous systems, considering that both systems applied a combination of both previous adaptations and unique elements…
Download file to see previous pages...
While previous adaptations played a major role in shaping the conflict that occurred between the Byzantine and Islamic empires, they were insufficient to operate on their own due to the consistent changes and dynamics that had occurred in the empires over time (Miller, 2002 n.p.). Therefore, it was inevitable for both systems to adapt a unique and current tactics and strategies that would not suffice for the intended dominance and supremacy wars. The Byzantine system borrowed more from the already collapsed Roman Empire of the 4th century, since they were more or less founded on similar principles (Watson, 2010 p87). Similarly, the Islamic systems also borrowed very much from the Huns, who were ancient Muslims who also had engaged in fights with the earlier Roman opponents, only that there was an addition of more Islam zeal during this period (Esposito, 1988 p37). Thus, it is apparent that both systems adapted strategies that would enable them defeat their opponents, which included forging ties with the neighboring empires to reinforce their might. Nevertheless, through academic research, this explorative paper concluded that both the Byzantine Empire and Islamic System had military, cultural and economic force. However, the analysis found that the Islamic empire had a religious force behind their push, which served to compensate for the lack of a sophisticated administrative system, like the one that the Byzantine Empire had already put in place. Military within Byzantine Empire was made up of a large force, which did not reduce despite several incursions from the Muslims, owing to the continued growth of the population within the Byzantine Empire (Watson, 2010 p82). Byzantine Empire Military managed to maintain a huge force starting the 10th century through the 12th century, although the sufficient resources required to create such large armies and enhance their efficiency had dwindled over time, making it impossible for the empire to establish a large efficient national army. The strength of the Byzantine Empire Military was based on the establishment of a sophisticated administrative system through the 10th and the 11th century, referred to as the theme system (Haldon, 2002 p12). This system divided the whole Byzantine Empire into several administrative units, which were then able to consolidate their authority over the territory they manned, at the expense of the establishment of large national army, which would require much resources and logistical planning and strategies. The thematic system was applied as an effective solution tool, to counter the Islamic army attacks, which were being experienced from different sides of the Byzantine Empire, making it possible for rapid response to the attacks, as opposed to the large national military response, which would be delayed by the logistical and the resource requirements (Miller, 2002 n.p.). The essence of the thematic military strategy applied by the Byzantine Empire, was to maintain a full time field presence of the troops in different regions of the empire that were prone to attacks, something that would not be efficient, through the use of a large national army (Esposito, 1988 p42). Military within Islamic System was based on a different system, which was an element of the previous adaptations from the Huns, who were also involved in conflicts with the earlier Roman Empire. The ‘hit and run’ tactic was the one the Muslim system mostly applied in their assault against the Byzantine Empire, which was perpetually threatened from various quarters. However, while the Muslim system borrowed the tactic from the Huns, who had previously engaged in a series of battle with the Roman Empire, they invoked the religious
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Byzantine and Islamic systems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/history/1491235-were-the-byzantine-and-islamic-systems-unique-or
(Byzantine and Islamic Systems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Byzantine and Islamic Systems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1491235-were-the-byzantine-and-islamic-systems-unique-or.
Crusades were a sequence of some religious expeditionary wars that were blessed by the Catholic Church’s pope with a stated goal, which was to restore Christian access to holy places in the neighborhood of Jerusalem City.
Certainly it was not an overnight process and it took 3 centuries in complete transformation of the Eastern Roman Empire into the Byzantine Empire. The many factors behind this transformation are several major wars, arrival of a new Muslim Civilization and the cultural transformation.
Pantheon, which is located in Rome, is admired for its concept of space and the amazing feats of architecture that makes it stand out from the other architectural styles. A characteristic feature of this style is the use of arcuated (arches) and trabeated (straight or horizontal beams) construction.
After the fall of Roman Empire, three civilizations begun based on religion - Byzantium and Islam. These two were adaptions of the previous roman system which was based on Christianity. As barbarian invaders ripped the western empire to shreds, the East subsisted as Byzantium and Constantinople as its capital. As trade, urban life, and knowledge declined in the Western empire, Byzantium developed a vital economy, refined and intellectual artistic life, and a robust administrative government that braced the Eastern Church. Administrative and doctrinal differences caused the Eastern and Western churches to divide in 1054, ending a centuries-long partition between Greek and Latin Christendom
B. Basilica Cistern in Istanbul exemplifies the influence of the ruling party's taste of Anatolia. Rows of pillars which were then prominently called colonnades adorned with characteristic cross and encircled with vines and leaves marks and lines the spaces that served as pathways of the members of the royal family.
This discussion will illustrate their attitudes and abilities to understand and equal the powerful men they encountered and dealt with during their lives.
Although Emperors were visible and famous, and it was their face that appeared on coins, and their image that was put first on mosaics and other decorations of the Empire, the women by their side had as much to do with the wars, military movements, sieges, and financial business of their times.
This essay discovers Byzantine icon painting. The most important and dominant form of Byzantine art is the Byzantine icon. The word icon is derived from the Greek eikones and refers to sacred images representing Christ, the Virgin Mary and the saints. The contemporary term has come to represent wooden panel painting, icons could be crafted.
The Byzantine Empire had initially concurred the parts of Europe and Italy and did not hesitate to reason in the line of expanding their military conquest and authority. The Islam caliphate expanded and
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Byzantine and Islamic systems for FREE!