Nobody downloaded yet

Can the direct targeting of civilians ever be morally justified - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The paper will aim at assessing the situational factors during the Second World War,which played a pivotal role in deciding upon the area bombing campaigns targeting the civilians.The paper will attempt to provide a justification on whether the bombing attacks on civilians can ever be justified morally…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.7% of users find it useful
Can the direct targeting of civilians ever be morally justified
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Can the direct targeting of civilians ever be morally justified"

Download file to see previous pages The Second World War caused numerous consequences to different nations owing to its magnitude and scale involving a vast geographic proportion of the world economies. It has been noted in this regard that the Second World War had been commenced with the participation of the then topmost nations of the world, which apparently signified the polarized world of the 20th century, where one side was apparently stronger and powerful than the other side. Comparing the casualties caused due to the First and the Second World War, especially those suffered by the civil societies around the world excluding the military property losses, historians revealed that area bombing campaign in the latter had a more devastating result. To be noted, the concept of area bombing was first developed by the British military during the war, where they had planned to attack certain specific areas of Germany as a part of their war strategy. The decision of Britain to attack German civil areas through the bombing strategy was mainly with the intention to deindustrialize the conditions of Germany and to make the nation weak from within. To be precise, with the civilians being affected due to the warfare, it was quite likely to increase threats for domestic social as well as political unrests. Also, with the destruction of such a huge proportion of civilians, Germany would eventually become weak to afford the continuously rising need for soldiers to fight its enemies. This further meant that Germany will not be able to attack or pose a threat to any other nation during the Second World War. Therefore, it can be apparently observed that the intention behind area bombings by British on German civilians was to make the country vulnerable both economically as well as socially, with the expectation that it would eventually drive the nation away from participating in the wars. Apparently, this area bombing approach taken by the British military against Germany, ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Can the direct targeting of civilians ever be morally justified Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Can the Direct Targeting of Civilians Ever Be Morally Justified Essay)
“Can the Direct Targeting of Civilians Ever Be Morally Justified Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Euthanasia: Can It Ever Be Morally or Ethically Justifiable
...? Euthanasia: Can It Ever Be Morally or Ethically Justifiable? This paper reflects on the Assisted Suicide bill by Lord Joffe, which has been the subject of immense controversy when it was attempted to be introduced in the House of Lords. The bill, if enacted into law, would allow terminally ill patients to seek drugs from their doctors that would end their lives. The benefits of the act, if passed, will only be for those who have been medically diagnosed to live for six months, who are suffering from unbearable pain, and who are psychologically of sound mind and not depressed. The bill was defeated in the House of Lords but the debates concerning assisted dying persist and are unlikely to be resolved. At present, it would seem... on...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
International Law - Bombing of Civilians
...Rules of Aerial Warfare, The Hague, February 1923.”2 This states that there cannot be aerial bombardment for the purposes of terrorizing citizens, or bombardment for the purposes of destroying buildings which are not military in character. Basically, this article states that there can only be aerial bombardment of military targets, or within the immediate neighborhood of land forces. The fourth document is the “Protection of Civilian Populations Against Bombing from the Air in Case of War, League of Nations, September 30, 1938.”3 This document states that the intentional bombing is illegal, and that only military objectives can be bombed. The contrast to these documents...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Insurgency: Intentional Targeting of Civilians
...? Insurgency: Intentional Targeting of Civilians The world witnessed several cases of insurgencies over the past few decades. Very often the difference between terrorism and insurgency blurs although both share certain common features like violent struggle that intends to overthrow the existing authority. Terrorism maintains cross border linkage and often has multiple targets including foreign nations or regions. In contrast, insurgency which intends to bring down the existing government is confined to national boundary; and this will have the support of a portion of local people. Hence, insurgency could be termed as a localized form of terrorism. The powerful mobilization during the past decade in Iraq, Darfur, and New York City... was...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Civilians On The Battlefield case. Generally, civilians will be assigned duties at echelons-above-division in an effort to minimize their exposure to harm. Civilians should support and participate in military activities as long as they avoid to get integrated into combat operations. The Department of Defense's (DOD's) Law of War Working Group has offered a broad reaffirmation of this demarcation: "A civilian accompanying the Armed Forces in the field may not engage in or be ordered to engage in activities inconsistent with his or her civilian status. "The Army and Air Force, however, appear to accept the notion that civilians can and do perform "duties directly...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
The Death penalty/capital punishment: Can It Ever Be Justified
...The Death penalty/capital punishment: Can It Ever Be Justified I believe the vital thing we can do for the people in the world is to let them recognize that it is acceptable to be angry. You must be angry, you should want revenge -those are especially usual responses. My concern is with the criminal justice system in the United States of America and how that functions. The only ones that we execute in America are the unproblematic ones-with the exemption of Timothy McVeigh, the victims of the death penalty/capital punishment are minorities, the poor and the most defenseless. The same people that are previously talking about revenge in this case are the same people who...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Is terrorism ever justified
... 30 July 2008 IS TERRORISM EVER JUSTIFIED Terrorism is one of the most terrible threats and evils faced bymodern community. Terrorism cannot be justified because it is an aggression of one nation or a group of people against another. In most terrorist attacks, innocent victims are killed or injured. Terrorism represents a threat for a modern society because it is an attack on legitimate transnational order. Thesis Terrorism cannot be justified because it brings fear and anxiety to peaceful populations, it causes killing and injuries to innocent people and because it involves rise of military and police forces, a threat to global peace and security. Terrorism cannot be justified because it causes fear and anxiety among peaceful... a...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Is terrorism ever justified
...Is terrorism ever justified? There is no excuse to terrorism, however one may rationalize it. For instance, Noam Chomsky (2004) identified the US role in the rise of terrorist groups by training the network that would eventually serve as a backbone of Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda group back in 1979. (Chomsky & Barsamian) This paper will argue that terrorism is not about who started what or who was to blame for the rise modern terrorism, but that the debate should focus on the fact that using it as a tool is fundamentally wrong, both ethically and morally. Terrorism, like violence, is a normative concept. It is, by its nature, defined and thought to be wrong no matter which society or which culture. Even within war, terror tactics... are...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Can terrorism ever be morally justified
...Teacher’s This paper discusses whether the act of terrorism is justified or not. The topic is important philosophically because as we know, terrorism remains one of the most important challenges of the 21st century as it threatens the stability of international community. Not only does it endanger the governments and weaken economies, but also destabilize societies. It indeed has become more of an international enigma now and while social sciences study the causes, main varieties, history traces, and consequences of terrorism and also try to explain how terrorism has evolved over the years, philosophy focuses on two fundamental queries: What is terrorism? And can terrorism ever be...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Can an eye for an eye be morally justified
...Argumentative Essay – Can “an eye for an eye” be morally justified? Is there such a thing as a justified killing? Is all murder morally wrong? There is no logic for justified killing in this world. Killing someone is a very heinous act and does not come under the realms of moral or immoral discussions. It is something that creates anarchy within this world as the entire humanity is affected by the same. It is a fact that killing can never be justified and this has been the viewpoint of many others throughout the world as well. There are some people who would hate individuals but no one...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Is it ever justified to kill animals
...with no soul and feelings, as it perceived just as inanimate things like phones or TVs. In fact for most people animals are not alive, they are just means to meet humans’ needs. Unfortunately it is “the greatest achievement” of mankind – the deprivation of animateness. Our strong belief is that a person who just once has seen the procedure of killing animals with his or her own eyes probably wouldn’t eat the flesh of animals even one more time. It’s truly said that meat is the industry of killing animals, and humans are predators who tear the meat with fangs enjoying the taste, the taste of death. Can the death of animals be justified by the human thirst for meat? Wouldnt it be easier to give up meat...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Can the direct targeting of civilians ever be morally justified for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us