We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

The atomic bomb - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
Professor Name Day Month Year Atomic Bomb Essay Summary/Context There was an editorial published in the New York Times on December 9, 1945 titled ‘Debating the Atomic Bomb’. This short editorial focused in the social responsibility that the scientists developing weapons of mass destruction have…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
The atomic bomb essay
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
The atomic bomb

Download file to see previous pages... This editorial makes it a point to mention that, if a third world war is to be avoided, then the public must become even more involved. The author of this editorial, who is not named, makes the point that scientists are creating weapons that can alter the course of history. As such, they must have a responsibility to ensure these weapons are used as a deterrent, rather than for purposes of evil. The author contends that never before in history have scientists held so much power and, as such, a debate must take place to determine how, if ever, such bombs will be used again. This keeps in line with the political leaning of the New York Times during this time period. The paper, while not necessarily being outspoken critics of war efforts undertaken by the United States, certainly advocated a stance more towards the concept of neutrality. The Atomic Bomb was a big step in the advancement of war technology and editorials in the New York Times during 1945 took a hesitant stance towards its further development. If you will, it would appear that the editorial board of the paper certainly did not want to appear proud of the fact that we had dropped two such massive bombs on Japan. Finally, this editorial piece focused its attention on beginning to educate the public more about the advances of science. To this point, the author contends that scientific advancement went largely unnoticed. Now that weapons, such as the atomic bomb, are being created, the public must have more of a voice. The obvious point here is made that the decision to use such weapons eventually impacts every citizen in the country, so they need to make their voices heard. This position of getting the public more involved in the affairs of science is the overarching theme of this particular editorial. Analysis The author of this editorial has two main points. The major idea centers on the responsibility that scientists who are charge of creating such weapons as the atomic bomb have. This responsibility entails them understanding the power of destruction they hold over the world as these bombs are created. Furthermore, a second underlying them of the editorial the contention that scientists need to bring the atomic bomb debate to the American people. Since citizens are directly impacted by this weapons use, all of society has the responsibility to let the government know whether or not they approve of its eventual deployment in times of war. The atomic bomb was designed to bring a quick end to any conflict. Scientists developed it with this end result in mind. We know from out studies in class that the fighting in Japan was not going anywhere. It appeared that, if the war were to be drawn out on land, America and its Allies would suffer many more casualties. Claiming he had exhausted every other option, Roosevelt authorized the eventual use of the Atomic Bomb in Japan in an effort to avoid a prolonged ground war. We know the results. Roosevelt contention at the time was the he desired a quick end to the war, which was exactly what he got. War is an ugly business. America saved potentially thousands of their own lives that would have been lost had the war continued. These lives were saved, however, with the sacrificing of hundreds of thousands of Japanese citizens that died in an instant. This background on the decision to use the atomic bomb is necessary to truly understand the context of this particula ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Atomic Bomb
 Takaki explores the motivation behind the bombings in the context of race and the moral dimension of the act and extracts evidence from top-secret military reports, letters and diaries. The Most Controversial Decision: Truman, the Atomic Bombs, and the Defeat of Japan by Wilson D.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Was the use of atomic bomb on japan justified
The battle of Okinawa, the largest amphibious assault of the Second World War, was not just another island battle with the Japanese soldiers. Situated only 350 miles [550km] southwest of the mainland Japan within range of kamikaze airfields in southern island of Kyushu, Okinawa was, at best, considered part of Japan.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Japanese films that depict the Japanese atomic bomb experience
The picture-and-text combination in comic books/manga was best regarded as a medium for popular storytelling rivaled only by radio and film and eventually television. For several years, Japanese cartoonists created various atomic-related stories many of which involved super heroes that battled a collection of disgraceful villains.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb
Truman's conversations about the bomb were not about society's expectations, but rather on the post conventional thought that dealt with "...the effects of the use of the bomb, not [...] whether it ought to be used".1 The decision to use atomic bombs against Japan was influenced by several factors that are relevant to Kohlberg's stage 5 on the moral development scale.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb
After six months of intense fire-bombing of 67 other Japanese cities, the nuclear bomb “Little Boy” was dropped on the city of Hiroshima on Monday 6th August, 1945, which was duly followed on August 9th by the detonation of the “Fat Man” nuclear bomb over Nagasaki.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
DROPPING THE ATOMIC BOMB RIGHT OR WRONG DEBATE
Bombing them was the only solution to bring the war to an end. There were certain allies that met and agreed on policies towards Japan. The allies, then
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
THE DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB ON HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI
The death toll counts more than 200 thousands of civilian, and even an approximately unknown number of mutilated bodies and destinies. It can be referred to the fact that a great number of people dies every month in war time, still considering
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
THE ATOMIC BOMB
In this study text, the above factors influenced by the post-World War II are discussed. Terrorism, which suffices as having been applied during, and after the period, is evaluated. Reasons are provided as to why it is more of malum in se than it is malum prohibitum.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
DEVASTATION DONE BY ATOMIC BOMB
In addition, it argues on the Second World War attacks and if they were acts of terrorism. Moreover, whether justifiable terrorism exists and Latin phrases that relate to terrorism. Lastly, it talks about the difference in practice of war between nations and
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Scientific Discovery
This essay is discusses one such discovery (atomic bomb) that was a thought as science fiction in the past, ultimately led to a real scientific breakthrough based on that idea of the science fiction author (H.G. Wells). Dr.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic The atomic bomb essay for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us