To What Extent Was Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name Professor Module Date To what extent was Truman’s decision to drop the Atomic Bombs on Japan in World War II justified? A: Plan of Investigation Before August 6 1945, atomic bombs had never been used in war, and no one had an idea of the magnitude of their destructive capability…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
To What Extent Was Trumans Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "To What Extent Was Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified"

Download file to see previous pages The first atomic bomb was dropped over Hiroshima by a B-29 war craft on august 6 1945, resulting in the destruction of the city and instant deaths of over 90,000 people. It is still not clear why japan hesitated in surrendering after the damage and carnage in Hiroshima as the Truman administration did not give them much time to respond. On august 9 1945, the second atomic bomb was dropped over Nagasaki, a secondary target, to avoid poor visibility due to bad weather in Kokura, the primary target. The bombing of Nagasaki resulted in over 60,000 instant deaths. The Truman administration was planning on further attacks, but japan surrendered 5 days after Nagasaki bombing. These actions exposed Truman to sharp criticism, with many people referring to the bombings as barbaric. The main aim of this report is to use various primary and secondary sources to determine the level to which Truman’s actions were justified. Primary sources include official documents, eyewitness accounts and excerpts from harry Truman’s speeches and diaries, and secondary sources include textbooks and journal articles supporting or opposing Truman’s actions. ...
In any case, the American public was getting weary of war and Truman wanted to conclude it to prevent the countless deaths that were happening at the hands of the Japanese2. In addition, Truman was not enjoying the public perception that he was too soft on the Japanese3. Russia had the intentions of taking over the Japanese territory and something had to be done about it; and Truman figured that the United States had to show its power to the world to prevent the Soviet Union from emerging as the world’s super power4. Truman thought that if Russia gained any more power than it had, then it would resort to enforcement, spread and strengthening of communism5. The atomic bombs seemed to be the ideal tool to show America's superiority over the Soviet Union; and Truman showed the Soviet Union that he had the bombs and was ready to use them6. Japan only acted as a demonstration board since the United States was neither in good terms with japan, nor with the soviet union. However, Truman did not expect to cause deaths of innocent civilians, in fact, he believed that the two cities he ordered bombed were military bases7. In addition, Japan, USSR, and Germany were developing nuclear weapons; it was only a matter of the country that could use theirs first, which was mainly the reason why the United States joined hands with Canada and United Kingdom to pursue the Manhattan project8. To avoid the possibility of a nuclear war, Truman decided to use the means at his disposal to instill fear to the other countries developing the weapons. The other reason cited for Truman's use of the atomic bombs was to end the war as quickly as possible so that he could save countless of lives, including American9, Japanese, and ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“To What Extent Was Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(To What Extent Was Truman'S Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper)
“To What Extent Was Truman'S Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 1 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF To What Extent Was Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified

Atomic Bomb

... not justify what the leaders did or did not do, it does point out the incapacity of men to reason and find rationale when faced with daunting circumstances. (Malloy May,2008) WORKS CITED: Malloy, Sean L. Atomic Tragedy: Henry L. Stimson and the decision to use the bomb against Japan. Cornell University Press. Miscamble, Wilson D. The Most Controversial Decision: Truman, The Atomic Bombs, and the Defeat of Japan. Cambridge University Press, 2011. Takaki, Ronald. Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Atomic Bomb. New York: Little Brown and Company, 1995. Wainstock, Dennis D. The decision to drop the Atomic Bomb: Hiroshima and Nagasaki August 1945. Westport: Praeger, 1996.... ? Atomic Bomb Your History and...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Was the use of atomic bomb on japan justified

... Due Means or End: Was the Use of Atomic Bomb on Japan Justified? Introduction On August the 6thand 9th 1945, the United States under the stewardship of President Harry S. Truman dropped two destructive atomic bombs on two Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively. After nearly six years of a bloody, spirited battle that supped enormous resources from either of the allied powers, a world war instigated by a provocative Germany came to an abrupt end with the surrender of the Japanese Empire in the face of certain destruction aided by unimaginable force, the hitherto untested power of Atomic Bomb. But was Truman’s decision justified or was ill informed? A controversial event in history that has divided scholars right... in the...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb

...Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb President Truman, acting as Commander in Chief in 1945, had thrust upon him one of the most difficult moraldecisions in the history of humankind. While many argue the morality of the decision, there can be no doubt about its impact on the culture of the American military. Truman's conversations about the bomb were not about society's expectations, but rather on the post conventional thought that dealt with "...the effects of the use of the bomb, not [...] whether it ought to be used".1 The decision to use...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb

...Pavel Kaliadka Young, R Core 100 Assignment # 2 November Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb? The President of the United States Harry S. Truman had taken a decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan during the World War II. Therefore, on the 6th and 9th of August, the atomic bombs were dropped. After six months of intense fire-bombing of 67 other Japanese cities, the nuclear bomb “Little Boy” was dropped on the city of Hiroshima on Monday 6th August, 1945, which was duly followed...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb arriving at the recommendations to both President Roosevelt and President Truman. How did the “air of uncertainty” influence the choices made? Air of uncertainty indicated no proof that any given bomb would explode when dropped from an airplane. This resulted to a problem of exploding a bomb at predetermined height in air. However, the atomic bombs had a higher chance of exploding when dropped from a plane than the other types of bombs. This made them to be preferable to the other types of bombs. Therefore, the “air of uncertainty” influenced the choices made by revealing that other...
1 Pages(250 words)Article

President Truman's decision to drop Atomic Bomb

...loss of lives. Even then, the decision cannot be termed ethical because Truman targeted civilian locations instead of military settings. According to some others, Truman knew that Japan would surrender in a short period but he decided to use the atomic bomb only as a warning to the Soviet Union. If the Japanese people were killed only to teach Soviet Union a lesson, the action was highly unethical. References Goldberg, S. (1998, June). What Truman knew. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 54(3), 17-23. Messer, R. (1985, August). New evidence on Truman’s decision. Bulletin of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

What was the impact of the use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on the end of the Second World War and why surrender in the war11. The major priority according to the President Truman was to end the war as soon as possible with the least possible US casualties. Truman wanted to use the most efficient means of ending the war without using the atom bomb, but the circumstances became unfavourable for the US that forced them to drop nuclear bombs in the two cities of Japan. Moreover, investments in the Manhattan project tentamounted to nearly $2 billion (equivalent to $26 billion as on 2015). Therefore, in order to justify the cost of the project, the US conducted the nuclear attack. In addition to this, another factor that...
38 Pages(9500 words)Essay

THE DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB ON HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI used.”1 The opponents of dropping of atomic bombs see no military necessity in their usage for Japan was suffering from bombing every day and was almost ready to capitulate. Another reason not to justify the decision of the US command, soul touching one, is the immoral nature of such a way of killing people which is perceived as a war crime against humanity and the genocide. According to the words of admiral William D. Leahy, President Truman’s Chief of Staff, the nuclear means like atomic bombs are not appropriate way of fighting with enemy in a civilized world: "In being...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay


...groups. Introduction On the 6th day of August 1945, an American B-29 bomber dropped two atomic bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, bringing the Second World War to an end. The dusk of the war, however introduced a new dawn of controversies regarding deliberate attack of civilians in wars, whether the use of the atomic bomb was necessary, and whether war is a practice only reserved for standing armies and nations as opposed to small armed groups. Concisely, America transformed the style of war on the planet in that prior to the Nagasaki/Hiroshima bombings; civilians had never been portrayed as participants or targets in war. Further...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay


...Devastation done by atomic bomb affiliation Devastation done by atomic bomb Terrorism is the application of intimidation and violence in the chase for political goals. This review contains the effects of atomic bombing on the human body and materials. There is also an argument whether deliberate attacks against civilians are legitimate acts of war or are criminal offenses. In addition, it argues on the Second World War attacks and if they were acts of terrorism. Moreover, whether justifiable terrorism exists and Latin phrases that relate to terrorism. Lastly, it talks about the difference in practice of war between...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic To What Extent Was Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified for FREE!

Contact Us