Nobody downloaded yet

President Truman's decision to drop Atomic Bomb - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
While some people consider it as an example of unethical political decision-making, for some others, it was the most ethical decision available at that point of time…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.8% of users find it useful
President Trumans decision to drop Atomic Bomb
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"President Truman's decision to drop Atomic Bomb"

Download file to see previous pages In the words of Walker, another option available for Truman was to try a Normandy-type amphibious landing. In this case, the estimated casualty would have been anything around a million (2008, p. 9). That is, though cruel at the first sight, Truman’s decision was not less ethical given the options available at that point of time.
In the words of Wainstock (2013), the Japanese government had no respect for the lives of its own citizens and was not trying to save them. For example, though Japan faced several critical military defeats along with a crumbling industrial capacity, it exhibited a reluctance to give up the war. In contrast, it adopted highly unethical practices like ‘Kamikaze’ attacks where suicide bombers were used to target American military (Wainstock, 2013, p. 56). From this point, it is only rational to assume that had the war continued, Japan would have used its every citizen as a human shield. Thus, the decision by Truman to end the war instantaneously and unconditionally was the right option at that point of time.
Admittedly, Truman was advised that the power of the atomic bomb should be demonstrated to the government of Japan before its actual use so that they could take an informed decision. However, a close analysis reveals that it was not possible for Truman to do so. For example, had the demonstration failed, it would have caused serious damage to America, and Japan would have continued with increased rigor and confidence (Wainstock, 2013). In addition, even if Japanese authorities had known the power of atomic bomb, they would not have ceased. Firstly, Japan was duly warned of a “total destruction” but there was no effort from Japan to stop war. Instead, it went on adopting unethical practices like ‘Kamikaze’.
However, before giving a clean chit to Truman, it is wise to assess the other side of the argument as well. Firstly, Goldberg ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“President Truman's decision to drop Atomic Bomb Assignment”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(President Truman'S Decision to Drop Atomic Bomb Assignment)
“President Truman'S Decision to Drop Atomic Bomb Assignment”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Atomic Bomb
...University Press, 192 pp.) This book focuses on the American use of the atomic bomb and how it affected the result of World War II by exploring the situation and context in which President Truman decided to use the atomic bomb. Miscamble uses archival research and latest scholarship to address the value of the decision to end the war and at the same time writes on the moral premise of such an act. The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb: Hiroshima and Nagasaki: August 1945 by Dennis D. Wainstok (Westport: Praeger, 1996. x, 180 pp.) In his book Dennis...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
To What Extent Was Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Justified
...Module To what extent was Truman’s decision to drop the Atomic Bombs on Japan in World War II justified? A: Plan of Investigation Before August 6 1945, atomic bombs had never been used in war, and no one had an idea of the magnitude of their destructive capability. President Truman was the first person to authorize their use following Japan's hesitation in surrendering; japan had rejected the United States’ terms of surrender. The Japanese wanted to retain emperor Hirohito, and retain their ability to wage war, as opposed to the United States requirement that required surrender of the...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
The atomic bomb essay and editorials in the New York Times during 1945 took a hesitant stance towards its further development. If you will, it would appear that the editorial board of the paper certainly did not want to appear proud of the fact that we had dropped two such massive bombs on Japan. Finally, this editorial piece focused its attention on beginning to educate the public more about the advances of science. To this point, the author contends that scientific advancement went largely unnoticed. Now that weapons, such as the atomic bomb, are being created, the public must have more of a voice. The obvious point here is made that the decision to use such...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb
...Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb President Truman, acting as Commander in Chief in 1945, had thrust upon him one of the most difficult moraldecisions in the history of humankind. While many argue the morality of the decision, there can be no doubt about its impact on the culture of the American military. Truman's conversations about the bomb were not about society's expectations, but rather on the post conventional thought that dealt with "...the effects of the use of the bomb, not [...] whether it ought to be used".1 The...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
President truman
...Harry Truman was the 33rd President of America who had brought forth a new wave of independent thoughts and decision in the presidency. While many ofhis political and military decisions helped America to become a world power to be reckoned with, his domestic policies, though intrinsically good, were not very popular amongst the emerging new segment of affluent Americans. The main aims of his domestic policy, better known as ‘fair deal reforms’ were designed towards improving socio-economic conditions of the masses through creation of job opportunities and facilitating state welfare schemes for the poor and the needy. He had assumed office at a time when...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb
...Pavel Kaliadka Young, R Core 100 Assignment # 2 November Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb? The President of the United States Harry S. Truman had taken a decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan during the World War II. Therefore, on the 6th and 9th of August, the atomic bombs were dropped. After six months of intense fire-bombing of 67 other Japanese cities, the nuclear bomb “Little Boy” was dropped on the city of Hiroshima on Monday 6th August, 1945, which...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb arriving at the recommendations to both President Roosevelt and President Truman. How did the “air of uncertainty” influence the choices made? Air of uncertainty indicated no proof that any given bomb would explode when dropped from an airplane. This resulted to a problem of exploding a bomb at predetermined height in air. However, the atomic bombs had a higher chance of exploding when dropped from a plane than the other types of bombs. This made them to be preferable to the other types of bombs. Therefore, the “air of uncertainty” influenced the...
1 Pages(250 words)Article
President Truman
..., just once in the world’s history) is that Hiroshima & Nagasaki bombings weren’t actually necessary for the victory in the war: the regular bombings continued anyway and the Japanese government being under intense pressure was about to surrender. In other words, American bomb attack hadn’t played a crucial role in establishment of peace, but had become a vast disaster resulting in numerous casualties, radiation spread and devastation. Thus, I consider President Truman’s decision to be useless, brutal and inhumane having much in common with mere genocide and racism. References: Hamner, C. The Atomic Bomb: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Retrieved 26 August from: was...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
THE DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB ON HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI used.”1 The opponents of dropping of atomic bombs see no military necessity in their usage for Japan was suffering from bombing every day and was almost ready to capitulate. Another reason not to justify the decision of the US command, soul touching one, is the immoral nature of such a way of killing people which is perceived as a war crime against humanity and the genocide. According to the words of admiral William D. Leahy, President Truman’s Chief of Staff, the nuclear means like atomic bombs are not appropriate way of fighting with enemy in a civilized world: "In being...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
...groups. Introduction On the 6th day of August 1945, an American B-29 bomber dropped two atomic bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, bringing the Second World War to an end. The dusk of the war, however introduced a new dawn of controversies regarding deliberate attack of civilians in wars, whether the use of the atomic bomb was necessary, and whether war is a practice only reserved for standing armies and nations as opposed to small armed groups. Concisely, America transformed the style of war on the planet in that prior to the Nagasaki/Hiroshima bombings; civilians had never been portrayed as participants or targets in war. Further...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Assignment on topic President Truman's decision to drop Atomic Bomb for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us