Nobody downloaded yet

Trumans Decision regarding the Atomic Bombs - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The Atomic bombing of the two Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki is an event surrounded by controversy till date. The decision was taken by the then American President Harry Truman in order to destroy Japan’s power to continue the war. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93% of users find it useful
Trumans Decision regarding the Atomic Bombs
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Trumans Decision regarding the Atomic Bombs"

Download file to see previous pages produced and finally in the early morning of July 16, 1945, the first successful testing of an Atomic bomb was conducted at the Trinity test site at Alamogordo, New Mexico. During this time, the allied forces had already captured Germany, but Japan continued to fight the war even with the clear indication of their little chance of winning. It was estimated that in the period between mid-April to mid-July in 1945 Japan displayed ferocity by killing massive number of allied forces. The Japanese government even rejected the proposal made in Potsdam Declaration that proposed the Japanese armed forces to surrender or else face “prompt and utter destruction” (The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Truman believed that the destruction caused by the Atomic bomb in the Japanese cities would place America in a formidable position amongst the other powerful nations of the world. Controversies President Truman experienced many dilemmas that influenced his decision to drop the Atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Within two weeks of becoming president, he received a full report on the developmental process of the most expensive war material which stated it as “the most terrible weapon ever known in human history” (Hamby, 18). On 8th May 1945, after Germany surrendered, it was still necessary to defeat the Japanese. Truman’s decision was highly influenced by his past experience of being a combat artillery in the WWI. During that phase he developed a perspective of Japanese fanaticism, and also as American President he wanted to exhibit his diplomatic power by solving the existing difficulties with Soviet Union which was not yet at war with Japan. Many scholars in response to the utter calamity caused by the Atomic bombs professed that Truman deliberately killed and...
Japan was always a losing side since the nation’s military power was in no way a match for the U.S. military power. Moreover, by August 1995 fatigue had set in and it was highly possible that the Japanese would surrender by the end of the year. Moreover, I feel the first Atomic bomb could be dropped anywhere near the harbor if the intention was only to scare the Japanese and force them to surrender. Also, I feel the Potsdam Declaration should have been modified, and instead of ordering the Japanese to surrender unconditionally they should have given the chance to say something. There is also the fact that the bomb was dropped on two cities which resulted in deaths of more civilians than soldiers. Finally, the major reason why I cannot support Truman’s decision is that many Japanese people are still suffering from diseases that occurred from the bomb’s radiation. On such grounds which include both political and moral issues, it was an unjustified act by President Truman. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Trumans Decision regarding the Atomic Bombs Research Paper”, n.d.)
Trumans Decision regarding the Atomic Bombs Research Paper. Retrieved from
(Trumans Decision Regarding the Atomic Bombs Research Paper)
Trumans Decision Regarding the Atomic Bombs Research Paper.
“Trumans Decision Regarding the Atomic Bombs Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
US Dropping of Two Atomic Bombs on Japan
...also led to cold war, a state of economic competition, military tension, political conflict and proxy wars between the communist world, mainly the Soviet Union, and the powers of the western world, mainly the US. Conclusion The WWII has generated a lot of controversy among historians and scholars due to the complexity of the decision to drop two atomic bombs over Japan. In analyzing the various factors and motivations that contributed to Truman deciding to order the bombings, several things are worth considerations. The major considerations are military reasons, racism, desire to impress the Soviets, desire for atomic diplomacy and fear...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Atomic Bomb
...? Atomic Bomb Your History and Political Science 11/08 Was it necessary to drop the atomic bomb to end World War II? Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Atomic Bomb by Ronald Takaki (pp. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1995.) In this book Ronald Takaki, a renowned historian, surveys the reasons behind America’s decision to bomb Japan; Was Hiroshima bombed to hasten the end of war or indicate the initiation of the Cold War? Takaki explores the motivation behind the bombings in the context of race and the moral dimension of the act and extracts evidence from top-secret military reports, letters and diaries. The Most Controversial Decision: Truman, the Atomic Bombs, and the Defeat of Japan by Wilson D. Miscamble C.S.C (Cambridge... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
US Drop the Atomic Bombs on Japan to Put an Immediate End to the War
... directly asked to end the war himself (Toland & John, 1982). People who slant the decision of nuclear bombings are well in numbers. Among them are numerous US military leaders as well as ex-president Herbert Hoover. And they move for the notion that the nuclear bombing was simply an addition to an already violent bombing campaign (Wilson, 2007).  The bombing campaign along with the sea blockade and the downfall of Germany (with its effects regarding relocation of troops), would also have brought Japanese administration to surrender, therefore proving that the atomic bombings were unnecessary from a...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Atomic Bombing
...not mean it was a unanimous decision after all based on the conducted poll regarding this matter.6 As stated earlier, this was due to some important issues associated with such move emphasized by its critics, which primarily have their basic point on the preservation of life. As Niccolo Machiavelli points out at the top of his political know-how, the end could justify the means, his political principle was proven exact in the case of US-Japan war. Furthermore, from the point of view of utilitarian principle, what the US did was in fact for the greatest good of the majority. Conclusion The atomic bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was so far the best course of action by...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb
...Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb President Truman, acting as Commander in Chief in 1945, had thrust upon him one of the most difficult moraldecisions in the history of humankind. While many argue the morality of the decision, there can be no doubt about its impact on the culture of the American military. Truman's conversations about the bomb were not about society's expectations, but rather on the post conventional thought that dealt with "...the effects of the use of the bomb, not [...] whether it ought to be used".1 The decision to use atomic...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Atomic Spectra
...Part I: (20 pts Typed Introduction Section Print one hard copy to bring to lab and submit to Part II: (15 pts Worksheet General a. (2 pts.) Why do elements and ions exhibit line emission spectra? (not continuous spectra) when an element or its compound is volatilized on a flame the electrons in the atom are excited, and jumps to the higher energy orbits. Here these electrons are unstable and try to return to their initial position. As the electron return back to its lower orbit the photon of specific wavelength is emitted, and the wavelength depends on the difference in energy between the two states. Now the spectrum of these wavelengths (radiations) when observe against the dark back ground gives us the...
1 Pages(250 words)Lab Report
The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb arriving at the recommendations to both President Roosevelt and President Truman. How did the “air of uncertainty” influence the choices made? Air of uncertainty indicated no proof that any given bomb would explode when dropped from an airplane. This resulted to a problem of exploding a bomb at predetermined height in air. However, the atomic bombs had a higher chance of exploding when dropped from a plane than the other types of bombs. This made them to be preferable to the other types of bombs. Therefore, the “air of uncertainty” influenced the choices made by revealing that other bombs had a lower...
1 Pages(250 words)Article
Bombs Bursting in Air
...Bombs Bursting in Air We live most of our lives being sheltered by our parents from the harsh reality of the world around us. In their belief that our innocence needs to be protected and that we are too young to understand things that are going on around us, they deprive of the most valuable lessons in life that can only be learned by experiencing hurt and recovering from it. These experiences that we are shielded from are the “bombs bursting in air”. These are the life realities that we see but cannot understand because nobody wants to explain it to us in terms of reality. But we still hear the “bombs” going off in our lives and we are afraid or lost because of what is going on. Rather...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
Atom bombs
...decided to waste some lives ruthlessly to make an impression on the Soviet Union (The New York Times, 1995). Some revisionists are of the view that America had to avenge for the Pearl Harbor aftermath and strengthen its position against the Russians. The guardians of Truman’s decision keep arguing to this day that they had to protect the lives of American civilians and completely cease the Second World War. The defenders have not been able to encounter the simple objection that an atomic bomb was not required to end the Pacific war. It is morally and technically unjustified; Bernstein was also of the opinion that the war would have ended sooner or later without the...
3 Pages(750 words)Admission/Application Essay
President Truman's decision to drop Atomic Bomb
...Truman and Atomic Bomb of the Truman and Atomic Bomb Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bomb in Japan is still alive in debates for its ethical implications. While some people consider it as an example of unethical political decision-making, for some others, it was the most ethical decision available at that point of time for Truman. Walker (2008, p. 1) points towards the fact that even without the use of atomic bombs, the number of deaths and casualties would not have been much...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Trumans Decision regarding the Atomic Bombs for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us