Instructor Ohio Senate Race 2012 Sherrod Brown vs. Josh Mandel The state of Ohio is under sharp focus since it is a key battle ground state for the Senate and the Presidential race. For the Senate, the race features the incumbent Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown who is facing an uphill battle from the Republican Josh Mandel…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Ohio Senate Race 2012 Sherrod Brown vs. Josh Mandel"
Download file to see previous pages
The key issue that the candidates are asking voters to consider is the recently passed health care law, popularly known as “Obamacare.” On one hand, Brown, just as a majority of Democrats, likes the law and supported its passage. On the other hand, Mandel wants this law repealed (Torry, “Healthcare”). Indeed, the healthcare issue has been divisive not only amongst Ohioans, but also across the entire nation. This issue is important because Ohioans will identify the candidate who will support their preferred choice for healthcare. The two candidates are asking voters to consider the issue of abortion, which is another issue that draws emotions in the American society with people being either pro-choice or against abortion. This issue is crucial, especially amongst women voters, since they need to make a decision regarding the candidate who will support their needs. In addition, the recent global financial crisis is another issue that the candidates are asking voters to consider. In line with this, voters will want to know the candidate who will bring measures that reduced the States federal debt while improving the economy of the state (Torry, “Federal Debt”). On one hand, Brown portrays himself as a defender of the middle class and a supporter of the rights of women. ...
Conversely, Mandel projects Brown’s pro-choice image as views of an extremist (Sewell). Through campaign ads, debates, and public rallies, the candidates are able to get their messages out to the voters. In fact, the Ohio Senate race is the most expensive race this election year (Davidson). Hence, various people and groups have spent money on ads in this campaign since the stakes are high. The candidates have tried hard to avoid any gaffes and controversies that might cost them the race due to the thin margin in the opinion polls. However, Mandel’s gaffe of calling Mourdock a “gentleman” and his remarks about abortion a “class act” might influence the voting patterns amongst women (Sewell). Nonetheless, Mandel indicated that he did not agree with Mourdock’s statement and the media failed to highlight this issue. The media’s coverage of the race is faultless. In this case, the local media and the national media have been instrumental in highlighting the issues that these two candidates propose to the voters. In addition, the analysis and the reporting have been fair since each candidate appears to have equal airplay by the media covering the race. Brown’s message to the voters regards the improvement of the State’s economy, and he provides specifics on the issue of taxes. On the other hand, Josh’s main message to the voters on tax opposes Brown’s message on tax extensions. However, the two candidates do not provide the specifics that lay a plan on reducing the deficit that the State is currently facing (Torry, “Federal Debt”). Thus, the media are not distorting the messages from these two candidates as the two candidates failed to provide a clear approach of dealing with the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“Ohio Senate Race 2012 Sherrod Brown vs. Josh Mandel Case Study”, n.d.)
Ohio Senate Race 2012 Sherrod Brown vs. Josh Mandel Case Study. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1460302-ohio-senate-race
(Ohio Senate Race 2012 Sherrod Brown Vs. Josh Mandel Case Study)
Ohio Senate Race 2012 Sherrod Brown Vs. Josh Mandel Case Study. https://studentshare.org/history/1460302-ohio-senate-race.
“Ohio Senate Race 2012 Sherrod Brown Vs. Josh Mandel Case Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1460302-ohio-senate-race.
This process is sometimes accompanied by a ‘pat down’ search of the outer clothing or apparel of the suspect, done with a view to ensure that the person is unarmed. While this mechanism is common place in today’s high risk world, its validity juxtaposed to the Fourth Amendment was examined by the Hon’ble United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry v.
The act of the police officer is done upon his or her suspicion that a crime may be undertaken because of a sense or reasonable belief that the person in question may be armed and presently dangerous. This was the decision that the courts reached when they read the facts of the case as per the petition of John W. Terry, who was stopped and searched based upon a police officer's observation and conclusion that Terry seemed to be casing a store for a potential robbery.
Ohio case, which led to terry stops, in a span of seven years, 335 law enforcement officers, had been killed. In addition, there were over 23,000 assaults on law enforcement officers.2 They were being attacked and even killed by violent people. This necessitated the need for the government to protect its law enforcement officers.
According to the author, the Terry V Ohio case took place when a police officer stopped and checked three men because of their suspicious behavior. Occurring on October 31st 1963 when an experienced and old member of the Cleveland Police Department, Martin Macfadden, went patrolling downtown and saw two individuals acting suspiciously.
Ten days before the incidence, she had experienced a severe miscarriage. To control the pain The Appellant was under Fiorinal medication, which contains barbiturate.
The defense council had assessed the possibility of insanity, which would have given a not guilty
According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that the success that Google has as well as its market position is founded on the tactics and influence of its market research and analysis where product innovation solutions assist it to acquire market share and attract millions of customers worldwide.
takes into consideration state search and seizure practices at the time of the Fourth Amendment’s enactment and current state practices.In this regard when interpreting the Fourth Amendment,the court in defining the scope of Federal protection both trusts and mistrusts modern
Brown who was suffering from the problem of third-degree heart block along with syncopal episodes, weakness as well as fatigue for around 21 days. The cardiologist felt the need of performing surgery to set pacemaker in Mr. Brown’s respiratory system. However, Mr.
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Ohio Senate Race 2012 Sherrod Brown vs. Josh Mandel"
with a personal 20% discount.