Professor Name GOVT 2305 Day Month Year Opposing Viewpoints: Gay Marriage One man. One woman. That has been the prevailing thought for years when one talks about traditional marriage in the United States. In recent decades, however, this thinking has been challenged by not only the Gay and Lesbian community, but by other social activists across the country…
Download file to see previous pages...
Others believe that this is a fight for religious freedom, making their voices heard that “Gay marriage legislation threatens the very religious liberties we have fought so hard to maintain for centuries” (Ross 101). Perhaps, there is no more divisive a social issue today than gay marriage. In determining how America will move forward in this regard, the definition of love and marriage, the legal ramifications, and the effects on societal values must all be closely examined. Perhaps the strongest argument in support of gay marriage is that the government should not be permitted to legislate whom a person is permitted to love. Now, legislators will contend that laws are not designed to keep members of society from loving members of the same sex. If they choose to love and cohabitate with the same gender, however, the benefits of marriage will not be afforded to them. James Kellard points out that, “Conservatives do not argue that the US Constitution bans gay marriage, probably because the opposite is true” (98). ...
Kellard points out, for example, “there are people who marry for money, non-sexual companionship, even health insurance” (99). The argument, therefore, can be made that marriage should not be denied to two consenting adults simply based on their sex, when opposite sex couples are equally (perhaps even more so) prone to getting married for reasons contrary to the traditional definition of marriage. The legal ramifications of this issue are far reaching. Interestingly, a movement began in this country back in the 1980s to rid society of discrimination against homosexuals. While you cannot force a person to change their heart and mindset towards a people group, laws can be enacted to protect groups of people. This is exactly what has taken place of the last 30 years. Gays and lesbians are now more protected in the workplace and hate crimes laws have been enacted, just to name a few. The fight for gay marriage truly began in Hawaii in 1991. Since that time, several states across the country have enacted laws granting gays and lesbians the right to marry, while a host of others have specifically passed laws defining marriage as only between one man and one woman, thereby effectively barring gays and lesbians from taking part in this institution. As an answer to this issue at the federal level, the Defense of Marriage Act was passed in 1996. “This bill specified that all federal legislation dealing with marriage would refer solely to heterosexual marriages” (United States Congress 68). This essentially means that the federal government, for example, still does not recognize a legal marriage in the state of New York. The two sides are
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Gay Marriage Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 2”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1459966-gay-marriage
(Gay Marriage Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 2)
“Gay Marriage Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 2”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1459966-gay-marriage.
In many ways including through theatre, cinema, and commercials, the media is projecting gay marriage as a symbol of enlightenment and moderation. On the other hand, religious scholars are also not backing down on this issue, except they are condemning such proposals.
The subject of gay marriage in the United States has caused a lot of controversy over recent years, and the country still seems deeply divided on the issue. Many gay people and liberals argue that it is not fair to exclude long term and loyal homosexual partners from the legal benefits and social esteem that marriage brings.
Marriage has legal as well as social aspects. It is evident that many countries grant tax benefits to married couples. Marriage ensures the property rights if one partner is died or permanently disabled. In a social point of view, marriage constitutes a couple’s commitment to each other and their agreement as a family unit.
Even though gay marriage possesses legal recognition in some states, the moral and ethical dimensions were always questioned by intellectuals, sociologists, researchers and experts. It is evident that gay marriage is against the natural order; it undermines the sacred institution of marriage and natural heterosexual relationships which result in the procreation of children and paves the way for familial relationships.
However, a few governments have already started formalizing same-sex marriages. The most important argument put forward by the proponents of the same-sex marriage is that denying this right amounts to denying universal human rights. However, gay marriage is not normal, for it violates the nature’s law as the tendency of homosexuality is only one among the many sexual deviations experienced in humans.
This argumentative essay is focused on different perspectives on this question. Currently, the New York State Senate and the law approved a right of gays for marriage. Therefore, it is possible to claim that gay marriage is promoted and legalized throughout the country in the course of time.
The article goes into detail about the history of same-sex marriage bans, from the marriages themselves to the rights that these couples have been denied, including benefits to same-sex spouses. Many states have overturned these rulings, claiming that it is unconstitutional to essentially punish a lawfully married couple for being gay (Bravin par.
Although there are some states in the U.S. that permits, recognize or fighting for a legal matrimonial bonding between the same sex1, there are still a lot of institutions and places throughout the United States that strongly oppose and does not recognize the legality of
At the same time, the countries that oppose such marriage treat it as immoral, unethical, and dangerous issue. From the religious point of view, marriage is considered to be a sacrament, a social institution where in two