Legalizing Gay Marriage - Annotated Bibliography Example

Adam Wagner (2012). Should gay marriage be legalized? UK human right blog, 8(15). 12.
Adam argues that men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry ad to find a family. The article details the agreement with the arrangement of allowing gay marriage in society today. Adam argues that a majority of religions in the world have considered gay marriage a sin and unacceptable in the eyes of God. It is offensive and at the same time seen as stealing of religious freedom by accepting gay marriage, which is considered sinful. Adam mentions that gay marriage will not weaken the respect and the definition of marriage as an institution.
Barry, D. Adam (2003) ‘The Defense of Marriage Act and American Exceptionalism: The "Gay Marriage" Panic in the United States Journal of the History of Sexuality 12.2 retrieved from: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/sex/summary/v012/12.2adam.html
Barry’s article analyzes both arguments for and against the issue of gay marriage. The article aims is at providing a better understanding of the world before giving a summary of his opinion. Barry defines gay marriage as marriage between two people with the same gender identity. According to Barry (260), those in support of gay marriage view the arrangement as a marriage of equality. Proponents of gay marriage believe that this union should be of little concern to an individual as in the case of heterosexual marriage. Therefore, gay couples should be allowed to celebrate their union in public just like normal couples. On the contrary, those opposed to gay marriage argue that, since time immemorial, marriage institution has always been defined as between two people of different sex. That is man and woman. In addition, marriage is about procreation and bringing up children within a family.
Gale, D. (2008)."Equal Marriage for Same-Sex Couples." Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 22 Oct. 2012.
According to Gale, Equal Marriage is dated back to 2001 when Joe and Kevin Bourassa married in Toronto Metropolitan Church. Thereafter, the two proceeded to court seeking the state's recognition of their marriage right. This article provides an alternate point of view on gay marriage. According to Gale, the Ohio court instituted a right to same-sex. Therefore, no state within the U.S. should treat gay marriage as illegal. Despite the struggles in both the political and legal fields, we should know the world still discriminates the gay family. However, members of gay families have inner strength, resilience, and wisdom. These qualities help them develop unique ways in which they conduct their relationship.
Nagle, J. (2010). Same-sex marriage: The debate. New York, NY: Rosen Pub.
Nagle outlines his understanding of this hotly debated topic of gay marriage. As a rule of democracy, Nagle explains that every member of society is entitled to his/her rights, expression, association, and opinions. He refers to the statement by the Prime- Minister who on his part hinted that gay marriage is not a matter of ‘if’ but ‘when’, a condition which is consultation away. While writing this book, Nagle points out his stand by eluding that not even a single block should stand in the way of any two individuals who have common goals leading to a union. He indicates that providing legal recognition to same-sex marriages is just but a politically instituted attempt by the political powerhouses to weaken the fundamental pillars of marriage in society.
Reinhard, Beth. (2012). "Gay Marriage: An Evolutionary War?" National Journal. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Read More