Nobody downloaded yet

Review of the Separation of Powers Section of the Federalist Papers 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Review of the Separation of Powers Section of the Federalist Papers 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 The federalist papers constitute essays written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. They were written between 1787 and May 1788. Their intention was to convince the state of New York to endorse the United States constitution (Project Gutenberg, 1992)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
Review of the Separation of Powers Section of the Federalist Papers 47, 48, 49, 50, 51
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Review of the Separation of Powers Section of the Federalist Papers 47, 48, 49, 50, 51"

Download file to see previous pages This paper seeks to focus on sections federalist paper. Federalist Papers #47 In this essay, the principle of separation of power is addressed. At the time, the constitution was opposed, as it was perceived to breach separation of power. Those against asserted that the three arms of government are not adequately distinct and independent and power was irregularly distributed. Their worry was that the government would fail, and that freedom would be affected. Madison concurs with this notion on separation of power, mainly on the threat posed by unequal distribution of power. He claims that excessive authority in one branch is a recipe for authoritarian rule and it did not matter the number of men in authority. He claims that no further argument was needed if claims were objective. In contrast, he asserts that these claims lacked basis. He relies on Montesquieu, French in supporting his argument. Montesquieu relied on British constitution as his model. Montesquieu points out that the government branches in constitution are not absolutely separate or distinct. British king could intervene in legislative function when signing treaties. On the other hand, the king has authority of hiring and firing judges. ...
Federalist Papers #48 This essay propounds that the three branches needed not be absolutely separate and independent. It argues that each branch of government required minimum power to control the other two. Each branch is given some power by the constitution; however, it was to be controlled to avoid overexploitation of the power. He wrote that it was essential to differentiate between the three branches to be able to protect legal power vested on each branch of government. Madison concurs that conflict of interest are likely to arise due to power overlap. He states that theoretical checks expounded by the constitution are not adequate. He argues that the original drafters of republican government failed to draft laws that could check legislature. This created ways for legislature to abuse its power. He concurs that in hereditary monarchy the king is feared, likewise in direct democracies executive is feared, as legislature is ineffective in controlling powers of executive. This is because in direct democracies, the size of legislature is enormous, and power is scattered hence solving conflict is a challenge. In their envisaged government, the legislature was more likely to abuse the power as more power had been granted to it. On the other hand, legislature controlled a huge chunk of the money and controlled salaries paid to government employees. This was a recipe for corrupt dealing. In comparison presidential and judicial power was just simple and under extreme regulation. There existed no chance for the two branches to breach authority vested on the congress and any attempt was easy to detect (Project Gutenberg, 1992). Federalist Papers #49 Jefferson highlighted the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Review of the Separation of Powers Section of the Federalist Papers Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1451875-review-of-the-separation-of-powers-section-of-the
(Review of the Separation of Powers Section of the Federalist Papers Essay)
https://studentshare.org/history/1451875-review-of-the-separation-of-powers-section-of-the.
“Review of the Separation of Powers Section of the Federalist Papers Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1451875-review-of-the-separation-of-powers-section-of-the.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Separation of Powers
...? Separation of Powers of the of the Concerned 26 February Much progress has to be made before the UK has a satisfactory separation of powers. Critically discuss. Introduction Separation of power is an imperative to assure accountability on the part of a government, to restrain and dilute a trend towards corruption and to protect the fundamental and universal rights of the citizens, from incursions and interference of the governments in power.1 To achieve this cherished objective, it is a must to separate and circumscribe the legislative powers of the parliament to enact laws, the...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Federalist Papers
... important papers outlining the broader scope and structure of the constitution of the country besides presenting plausible arguments in favor of the formation of one large State. Federalist 10 actually dealt with how to deal with small factions or interest groups and what should be the overall structure of the State to overcome or control such factions. It is written in continuation of the Federalist 9 and also outlines as to how the existence of such groups can tear apart the whole republic. Federalist 51 discusses as to how an effective system of checks and balance as well as the separation of the powers within the government. This paper will therefore discuss both these papers and will explore some of the key arguments made... and their...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
The federalist paper #51 and American Politics
...by delegates at the states and not the entire public. Elections of the House of Representatives who led districts were the only political activities left at the hands of citizens in the particular districts. The Federalist paper number 51 is a famous federalist paper which was presented in 1788 by James Madison. The paper provides for affective checks and balances within the government. The paper also supports the need for separation of political power within the national governments of the US. Through the Federalist Paper number 51, the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Separation of Powers
...February 26, 2009 Separation of Powers Essays Aristotle's Politics is one of the most influential and enduring texts of political philosophy inall of history. Aristotle argued that the best attainable regime is a polity, the regime which "is neither democracy nor oligarchy, but the one midway between them." In mixing oligarchy and democracy, Aristotle believes that one can avoid the negative effects of either regime in its pure form while preserving the positive aspects of those regimes "democracy exists when the free and poor, being a majority, have authority to rule; oligarchy, when the wealthy and better born have authority and are few." For example, regarding offices one would have elections (an...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
The Federalist Papers
...faction primarily because of the intellectual advantage that developed as a result of these publications. Federalist Paper 10 was written by James Madison and it specifically addresses the issue of the power and inherent danger of factional interests. The overriding argument between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists rested upon the fear of too much power in the hands of a centralized government. To counter these legitimate concerns, Madison's contribution to the Federalist Papers turned out to be one of the most important. Madison's argument rested upon the proposition that one of the finest...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Separation of Powers
...Separation of Powers Democracies the world over are functioning on the principle of ‘separation of powers’ between the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. Inbuilt ‘checks and balances’ in the system accord each branch of government powers to monitor the activities, as well as to limit the powers of the other two branches, either as general policy or in specific cases. This deters potential abuse of power and is intended to, “reduce opportunities for tyranny and to increase the general stability of the government” (Separation of Powers). In the present environment where the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Madison federalist 10 and 51
...to control a faction; one is to remove its causes and the second is to control its effects. He wishes to multiply the deposits of political power in the state itself sufficiently, to break down the sole dualism of rich and poor, and thus to guarantee both liberty and security. In Federalist 10, Madison predicts that the size of the United States and its variety of interests could be made a guarantee of stability and justice under the New Constitution. A verity of interest precludes forming of factions and the New Constitution, by safeguarding the interests of all parties irrespective of race, class or regional preferences, guarantees equality. In Federal 51, Madison holds that to ensure...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Separation of Powers
... that with these balancing aspects, a government that is interested in its citizens can be achieved. Client’s Last Name 5 Works Cited Hamilton, A. “Concerning Dangers from Dissensions Between the States for the Independent Journal.” The Federalists Papers # 6. 29 March 2009 Hamilton, A. “The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection” The Federalists Papers #9. 29 March 2009. “United States Constitution.” Cornell University Law School. 2009. Legal Information Institute. 29 March 2009. Vile, M. J. “Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers” (2nd ed.) 1998. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 29 March 2009 “We Have Been Told of Phantoms” The Anti-Federalist Papers #2. 29 March 2009. ... their...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Page 50 51 and
...March 22, Page 50 - Writing is discovery, learning how many paragraphs and how long they should be while writing. Some topic sentences need more than one paragraph to support it. More examples, more evidence, stronger topic sentence. Drafting helps develop the thesis, testing the different ways to prove it. Drafting needs research though. - Composing body paragraphs. Create a topic sentence. Each paragraph must have development, unity, and coherence. - Topic sentence as main point of each paragraph. Three functions of topic sentence: 1) support the thesis; 2) tell what the paragraph talks about; and 3) controls the subject of the paragraph. Page 51 Topic sentence, everything in paragraph, examples,...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
Federalist Papers
...Teacher Federalist Paper No.10 Federalist number 10 was written by James Madison under the pseudonym “Publius” where he proposed themechanism of checks and balances among the several factions in government. Federalist Paper number 10 was published on November 22, 1787 where it contained the argument of the need to ratify the United States Constitution. In this Federalist Paper #10, Madison talked about the weakness presented by a faction in a government but also presented the strength of the solution. The weakness was the faction inherent in every government and the strength is the republic form of government that...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Review of the Separation of Powers Section of the Federalist Papers 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 for FREE!
Contact Us