Nobody downloaded yet

Peaceful Coexistence Policy and the Changing Personalities in Soviet Leadership - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Peaceful Coexistence Policy and the changing personalities in Soviet Leadership Name: Instructor: Course: University: City: Date: The Soviet Union was structured to the tastes of the leader at the helm, and so served his interests. The policies in place served not to improve the economic, social or economic fortunes of the entire nation but to concur with the ideological leanings of the leader in office…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Peaceful Coexistence Policy and the Changing Personalities in Soviet Leadership
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Peaceful Coexistence Policy and the Changing Personalities in Soviet Leadership"

Download file to see previous pages However, not all policies resulted in failure and devastating suffering (Allen 1964). One notable exception was the policy of Peaceful Coexistence instituted by Khrushchev. Until then, the country had been led by Josef Stalin. Under Stalin’s leadership, many oppressive and rigid policies were put in place. After his death, there was a significant incentive to revise them as they had weakened Soviet standing, both abroad and at home. The United States had outpaced the Soviet Union in the nuclear arms race (Mc Dougall 2000). The Soviet Union was surrounded by United States bases located all over Europe. As a result, the Soviet Union had to buy time so as to catch up with its rival. Peaceful Coexistence was the perfect resort. By declaring its interest in peace, the Soviet Union could fend off any likely attacks from the United States at its weakest hour. By no means was Khrushchev a radical departure from Stalin. However, small changes took place, and they were the embodiment of the policy of Peaceful Coexistence. These small changes and how the person at the top helped brought them about shall be at the centre of this writing. Stalin was a dictator. He used all means, mostly brutal, to achieve his selfish aims. He eliminated enemies at an alarming rate and with great ferocity. Its worth pointing out that the name Stalin means ‘man of steel’. His brutality was evident in the way that he expelled Trotsky from the Communist party. He subsequently organized for his murder even while in exile, in Mexico City. He did not believe in political competition (Allen 1964). He eliminated several of his close allies. When his son tried to commit suicide unsuccessfully all he could say was, “the idiot can not even shoot straight”. From this character, it would also be fair to assume that the Soviet Union would also take on a more aggressive attitude to international affairs. On the political front, the Soviet Union under Stalin dealt brutally with Poland. They corrupted the politics of Soviet member countries like Poland and Ukraine. Generally, the Soviet Union under Stalin was a reflection of the man himself, brutal. Enter Khrushchev; an extremely different man when compared to Stalin. He could tolerate a little competition. He closed the Gulag labor camps which had thrived under Stalin. He criticized Stalin as a brutal despot. His preference to indulge in negotiations is well documented. Taking after his character, the Soviet Union also adopted a more conciliatory tone with regard to international conflicts. When the fate of East Berlin was at stake, he issued a sixth month deadline which he subsequently withdrew in the interests of peace. His approach to the Cuban Missile Crisis is also worth mention. In the depth of the Cold War, he clandestinely stacked nuclear weapons in Cuba, a few miles off the United States border (Mc Dougall 2000). After this plan was unmasked by the Kennedy administration, he respectfully abided by the truce. These differing approaches to politics in the Soviet Union directly derive from the leader at the helm. This is very much in consonance with the Soviet maxim that the revolution begins at the top. With regards to economic affairs, the approach also depended on the attitude and character of the leader at the helm. Under Stalin, the Soviet Union depended entirely on agriculture. It was Stalin’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Peaceful Coexistence Policy and the Changing Personalities in Soviet Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1448354-to-what-extent-was-the-policy-of-peaceful
(Peaceful Coexistence Policy and the Changing Personalities in Soviet Essay)
“Peaceful Coexistence Policy and the Changing Personalities in Soviet Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1448354-to-what-extent-was-the-policy-of-peaceful.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
The influence of ideology on the formation of Soviet foreign policy
Many scholars would agree that the complicated procedures, strategies, and goals making up the official Marxism-Leninism principle have had some influence on the formation of Soviet foreign policy, even though there are critical debates over the extent of the relevance of ideological influence.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
How significant a role did Ideology play in the formation of Soviet foreign policy
This paper will examine how significant a role did Ideology play in the formation of Soviet foreign policy in holding that the Soviet Union adopted the same strategies as other powerful states by following the policy of territorial expansion through incursion or insurrection, by establishing a strong government that controlled all territories and through involvement in the internal policies of its allies such as Afghanistan, Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia.
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
Strategic Leadership in a Changing World
Michael Porter associates the competitive advantage on a positive view while Gary Harmel works on it with it on a resource view. Organizations can only retain their competitive edge by changing to meet the wants of the business environment. The strategies implemented will improve the organizations learning and knowledge.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Strategic leadership in changing world
It is strategic management of implementing a strategy for managing change and creating a sense of direction in the global competitive business. Effective leaders should provide a strategic direction for transforming the organization in order to achieve success.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Maksim Litvinov And Soviet Foreign Policy During The 1930s
Litvinov was born Meyer Wallach on 17 July, 1876 to Jewish parents based in Bialystok. In 1898, he left his native Bialystok for Ukraine to become an active member of the Russian Social Democratic Labor party. During this period, he energetically recruited new members and followers in the general location of Kiev.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Leadership theories in a changing context
Listening is also an integral part of my work in that I have to listen to my colleagues for critique and advice in order to be a more effective leader
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Leadership in a Changing Environment
With regards to the success of the company, the strength and weaknesses of Kirsty’s leadership will be identified. Eventually, recommended ways on how Kirsty could improve the use of the available leadership style will be tackled and explained in
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
The Holy Grail of Peaceful Coexistence
Religion seems to have created rift in the society making one to wonder whether belonging to a certain religion is a crime. Djenita Pasic grew up in a religiously diverse country,
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Changing an Outdated Educational Policy
In terms of technology, education technology policies are the laws that guide and direct the use of internet in schools to improve education delivery. The government provides computers and internet to schools for educational purposes. Education
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Strategic leadership in changing world
The pure strategies described by porters imply not only a high chance that come at the price of higher risks, but also imply a higher chance of bankruptcy (Eldring 2009:16). Thus, the vital factor why so many firms are not committed to one of the generic strategies is risk involved and incapability of managers to change the strategic plans to the most profitable one.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Peaceful Coexistence Policy and the Changing Personalities in Soviet Leadership for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us