Download file to see previous pages...
According to him (Lenin), although the previous revolutions have succeeded in ensuring the state machine have perfected, the working class cannot sit down and expect the state machine to produce by itself. He clarifies that, the purpose of state and revolution is to exchange the violent and destructive revolution with very peaceful and coherent transition (Lenin 1941, p. 9). He was for the opinion that, the proletarian cannot achieve their requirement through violent means. His ideas were for the attainment and seizure of power without destruction of properties and the old state structures. Violence destroys the existing resources and work force therefore, conflict is tantamount to destruction of the already established properties which is very unethical. Lenin was not against the reformation but his main concern in the state and revolution was to discourage those people who took the Marx idea for granted that the bourgeois’ (owners of means of production) must be executed and destroyed together with their properties. According to him, the owners of the means of production are not bad but what is uncouth is the method they (bourgeois) use to control the political and economic avenues (Kelvin 1995, p. 90)
Lenin observed that, very few countries can survive after destroying the bourgeois state. He believed that, in as long as the proletarian revolution must do away with the old states, it should not destroy and abolish the state itself (Kelvin 1995, p. 90). ...
According to him, the owners of the means of production are not bad but what is uncouth is the method they (bourgeois) use to control the political and economic avenues (Kelvin 1995, p. 90) Lenin observed that, very few countries can survive after destroying the bourgeois state. He believed that, in as long as the proletarian revolution must do away with the old states, it should not destroy and abolish the state itself (Kelvin 1995, p. 90). The state must remain and it should life for along period of time without being destroyed. The resources which control and run the state are properties of the bourgeois. This therefore means, destroying the owners of means of production properties is equal to destruction of the state. His stand on the protection of the state does not imply that Lenin was for the opinion of weakening the revolution powers. He insisted that, the revolution power must be strong and need to extend their period of revolution. In as far as the reforms are relevant and important, Lenin insisted on not transforming working class into military militias. The transformation of the working class into military militia is only relevant if the owners of means of production use their military power to deter the revolutionaries’ effort. Nevertheless, transforming the working class to militia should be the last option when all the others options have failed (Kelvin 1995, p. 98). Lucio (1989, p. 69) states that, Lenin was not for the opinion that the proletarian class has only the mandate to dominate but not to govern. Such kind of ideas is for those who do not believe in changes in governance. According to Lenin, the state and revolutions are built on the ground of the proletariats having the capacity of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
These logistics functions also include; sourcing and procurement, customer service, production planning, packaging, scheduling and also assembly. Logistics management is a vital part of the entire planning levels and execution, and also strategic, tactical and operation.
It is apparent that without such work, Lenin would not have been able to articulate well the Marxist premise that violent revolution is necessary in destroying the foundations of the bourgeois state, which is the basic requirement for the establishment of socialism and for laying the groundwork for the era of communism.
Wilson and Lenin. The end of World War I created the need for global reforms that could guarantee peace and harmony. Woodrow Wilson from US and Vladimir Lenin from Russia had the greatest influence in the post World-War era. Both leaders had certain similarities in their aims but possessed different ideologies to accomplish it.
In this system there would be no social classes or private property ownership. Many countries such as Russia have experienced this revolution but in a different manner than depicted by the Marxists. The Russian revolution of 1917 saw the removal of the autocratic tsar from power and a communist government established by Lenin and Trotsky although it later became bureaucratic in nature.
Vladimir Lenin was the driving force behind the revolution even before it started. Throughout Russia had only one leader, Lenin, who planned, plotted, propagated and executed the task of bringing down the monarchy to replace it with the communist rule.
Following the removal of the Czarist regime in Russia, Lenin became not only the first leader of the newly established Russian Soviet Socialist Republic, but in 1922 he became the leader for the entire Soviet Union. Due to political threats aimed at his Communist beliefs, Lenin retreated from Russia in self-imposed exile into Europe for years; he returned immediately following the February Revolution and the abdication of Czar Nicolai II.
29) The Russian people had been fighting for a democratic country but the Tsar; Nicholas II would hear none of it. Alexander Fyodorovich Kerensky was a famous Russian politician before the Russian Revolutions of 1917. He
Lynch utilizes three contrasting U.S. cities of Boston, Los Angeles and Jersey City. He hypothesized that urban dwellers employ certain predictable ways to understand their environment that are later mapped as mental images. The main objective
Capitalism is highly associated with the growth of an economy, since the price and production processes are influenced by the market other than the government. Rights to private property give individuals
Furthermore, another significant player in the development of the revolution was Alexander Parvus, who played a role in ensuring that the Bolsheviks received the funding needed to successfully overthrow the Tsarist establishment. The Russian
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Lenin State and Revolution for FREE!