Assess the importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the outcome of the February and October revolutions of 1917 - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Many people in the country were not happy because the rulers were dictatorial. The first uprising to happen in the country occurred on December, 1825, and was known as the Decembrist uprising. After the Russo-Japanese…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Assess the importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the outcome of the February and October revolutions of 1917
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Assess the importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the outcome of the February and October revolutions of 1917"

Download file to see previous pages 12). In 1912, Kerensky was elected to become a member of the Fourth Duma in which he represented the Trudoviks. Kerensky was an active member in both camps of the Petrograd Soviet and the provisional government. It is worth noting that initially he was used as a bridge between the two principal bodies. During his time in the provisional government, he was the minister for justice, war, and became the prime minister later in his career (Acton, Cherniaev, & Rosenberg, 1997, p. 56).
On the other hand, Lenin believed that Kerensky was not taking the Russians to the right direction and as a result, he used the Bolshevik party to engage the people in a revolution. The Russians were against the First World War and they thought that the Tsars were not fighting for their rights. When Lenin got the control of the government, he became more tyrannical than any other ruler in the history of Russia. This is despite the fact that the Russians believed that Lenin would fight for the rights of the common citizen (Kennan, 1989, p. 194).
Strikes, food riots and the ensuing war made Russia ungovernable. When Lenin arrived by train from Switzerland, he was against the war and could not stomach Kerensky because he thought that he was not for reforms. Lenin mobilized the people and especially the army by promising them economic reforms and ending the war. Leon Trotsky was born by the name of Lev Davidovich Bronshtein and he initially supported Meshevik Internationalists. Prior to October Revolution, which occurred in 1917, he had joined the Bolshevik Party. He went ahead and became a prominent leader of the Bolshevik party. Despite the fact that he supported people and workers, he was later removed from power by the rise of Josef Stalin.
By the time the February Revolution erupted during 1917 spring, Kerensky was among the most vocal leaders for the revolution. The fact that he was an ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Assess the importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the outcome of Essay - 1”, n.d.)
Assess the importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the outcome of Essay - 1. Retrieved from
(Assess the Importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the Outcome of Essay - 1)
Assess the Importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the Outcome of Essay - 1.
“Assess the Importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the Outcome of Essay - 1”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Assess the importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the outcome of the February and October revolutions of 1917

Wilson and Lenin a major role in global prosperity as it would aid in preventing future wars. Both the leaders however were firm believers of the right of self-determination. They believed that people of state should have a say in the political workings of the country and that governance should not take place without the assent of the people (Wilson). Despite having different perspectives, Wilson and Lenin dreamt of a world where global peace and self-determination among the people would be common. The two had provided the world with different ideologies and course of actions to act upon. Works Cited Lenin, Vladimir. State and Revolution. Martino Fine Books, 2009. Print. Mayer, Arno J. Wilson vs....
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Marcel Duchamp's readymade Fountain(1917)

...? Marcel Duchamp’s readymade piece of art d Fountain was presented in 1917. He signed his art R. Mutt and submitted it to the Society of Independent Art. The Society of Independent Art made the claim to show every piece submitted. They never showed Duchamp’s Fountain. It might be because even the sensibilities of the most liberal artist in 1917 might be offended by a urinal positioned on its back. Duchamp’s Fountain represents different things to different people. This readymade art truly shows art is in the eye of the beholder. While this piece would not make a good home decoration, it should be admired for the boldness of the statement. Every artist has the right to display their art, whether offensive or not. Duchamp’s message... the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Lenin and the Bolsheviks

.... This tainted the minds of the public as being the most popular group. Lenin and Trotsky, who were the troop leaders, were smarter than their competitors were. The Kerensky government received pressure from outer sources to leave power (William 88). The government had also lacked trust from many Russians. With the greatest determination that the group had, it was reflected in the way they tackled the war. The group was also favored by the time as most Russians were yearning for change. In Russian history, 1917 is the year of revolution due to the February and the October revolutions that took place in...
7 Pages(1750 words)Assignment

Lenin State and Revolution

...?LENIN AND ROVOLUTION Lenin finished his writing on and revolution in 1917 when Russia was in the first stage of development (Lenin 1945, p. 23). The writing and the study of the state and revolution is one of the most important works of Lenin. The work focused on the important of socialist theory and practices which are relevant and important in the modern day’s development. According to Lenin (1945, p .3) the writing has the advantage of enjoying the unique authoritative status for the coming generation of scholars and activists who beliefs in socialist. The reason for its authoritative status is because of its spirit and component that evokes the hyper- bureaucratic status in socialist countries like Russia and goes contrary... to...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

The nature of the Bolshevik takeover in October 1917

...?The nature of the Bolshevik takeover in October 1917: Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that the failures of the Provisional Government were the main factors in enabling Lenin and the Bolsheviks to seize power The Bolsheviks’ seizure of power in October 1917 was the result of a growing discontentment among the masses and the military about their immediate future and sustenance that was called into question due to Russia’s continued participation in the World War I. This participation in war as well as the economic downturn of the country was the result of the policies of the Provisional Government....
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

Lenin and Bolshevik Revolution best as they could; but it was important for them to be led by Lenin in the further, ongoing struggle, which at that point, did not show much promise. But when he returned to them, contrary to their expectations, he confounded them calling their conduction of revolution plans 'fit for the archives' and starting the process from the beginning. From that moment onwards, there was no interference by any other leader, even by the able Leon Trotsky, and they all simply executed the orders rendered by the all powerful Lenin, whose name became synonymous with the revolution and communist, which even the scholars of today, cannot deny. "Many...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

February Revolution

...reform, creating a democratically elected executive and constituent assembly. 1917 saw two distinct Revolutions in Russia: the overthrow of the tsarist regime (February Revolution) and the coup by which the Bolsheviks took power (October Revolution). The causes of these two revolutions encompass Russia's political, social, and economic situation. Politically, the people of Russia resented the autocracy of Tsar Nicholas II. The losses that the Russians suffered during World War I further weakened Russia's view of Nicholas II (Lynch, 2000). Socially, tsarist Russia stood well behind the rest of Europe in its industry and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

(Why did Tsarism survive in 1905 but not in February 1917)

..., economic and social issues with which it was not possible for the Tsarist regime to endure. Russia revolution in 1917 which resulted to collapsing of the Tsarist regime also went along with economic meltdown as well as social atomization. Millions of Russians had lost their lives but upon Bolshevik seizure of supremacy in October 1917, the painful memory of subsumed into the revolutionary history. The Bolsheviks allotted themselves as leaders in various government ministries taking control of the countryside, they established Cheka to cruelly nullify rebels.” To mark the end of the war the leadership of Bolshevik signed the Brest-litovsk treaty with Germany later in...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay


... problems existing on their own and they were faced with problems of leadership as dictators ruled some of these countries till the twentieth century. The success of the American Revolution ushered in a great country that became a superpower in the world and it also made the oppressed people of the world to know that they could be freed from their oppressions, if they have the kind of determination and courage that the members of the Continental Army and the founding fathers showed during the American Revolution. The people of the world felt the effect of the French Revolution as it is one of the most important event in the European timeline. Different countries of the world, especially the ones in Europe modeled their fight... of...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment


... Lenin The Russian Revolution is one of the most important events that took place in twentieth century because it resultedin a series of events which would affect the world for the rest of that century. Among the most important actors in this revolution was Vladimir Lenin who played a significant role in it as its leader. Furthermore, another significant player in the development of the revolution was Alexander Parvus, who played a role in ensuring that the Bolsheviks received the funding needed to successfully overthrow the Tsarist establishment. The Russian Revolution came about as a result of various political actors as well as funding from foreign powers such as Germany which were interested in making sure that it withdrew... from the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Assess the importance of Kerensky, Trotsky and Lenin in the outcome of the February and October revolutions of 1917 for FREE!

Contact Us