Topic: The 2nd Amendment - Research Paper Example

If the writers of the second amendment could have predicted the effect of this change, they could possibly have expressed the change in in the constitution in a diverse manner. Most public arguments and judgments addressed the written angle and perspective of the amendment. Public enthusiasts and protesters against the phrasing of the amendment did not recognize even the pretentious aspect of the amendment. As a result, the perception of the American citizens towards the armed forces negatively changed.

Strong armed forces were disbelieved because they had been used as instruments of suppression by the monarchs of England for hundreds of years. The following research paper will look into the actual purpose of the amendment concerning the guarantee of continuance and thriving of state mercenaries as a way of ensuring security, or a person’s liberties to possess a firearm (Cornell 13). The initial context of the second amendment In the course of the declaration of independence, the freedom to own guns was introduced in various manners (Wilson 42).

The articles of confederation made it precise that each state is supposed to sustain their mercenaries. Nevertheless, this article does not embark on the liberty of a citizen owning a gun. According to the law, such a freedom may be implicit because the state did not design firearms for mercenaries’ use only. Therefore, securities would have to originate from state regulations. The Virginia declaration of rights did not address the freedom of citizens owning weapons. Even though the Virginia declaration of rights indicated the liberties of mercenaries owning weapons, the state did not design weapons specifically for militias.

North Carolina and Pennsylvania’s constitution assured of the right to own a gun without mentioning a mercenary (Carter 24). The purpose of looking into the initial context of this amendment is to approve the debates that arose because of the new country formed. The arming process of the militiamen was very crucial for the government. Therefore, the United States had an existing plan in the bill of rights that seemed to cater to the individual rights of owning a fire weapon for civilians. During the 1780s, the intensification of an autocrat to a leadership status in the United States led to an increased worry by the civilians.

Currently, voters are more inclined to vote for a leader who has stated objectives that aim at oppress the liberties of declaration paramilitary law. For the forerunner who has declared the objective of stopping an entire country from embarking on a task that would ruin the country’s government and people. The teamwork of patriots who would observe the implementation of such a proposal finds the action profound and a matter of falsehood. Beginning from this amendment, the concern for security by the entire nation has been a major issue.

The second amendment sparked the current debates and controversies concerning the increased rate of violence in the United States (Cornell 18). Rhetoric aspect of the second amendment The guarantee of continuance and thriving of state mercenaries as a way of ensuring security or a person’s liberties to possess a firearm has become a major issue in governance in the United States. Commenced by the second amendment, both sides of the issue are likely to be positively resolved. During the civil conflict for independence, regular armed