Repealing the Second Amendment Name University Repealing the Second Amendment The 2nd Amendment of the constitution of US allows the citizens to carry arms and ammunition with themselves (Charles, 2009, p.199). For several years the second amendment has come under scrutiny due to the enormous amount of gun related criminal issues…
Download file to see previous pages...
The number of guns registered to the civilians of United States is quite high, but this does not mean that it is necessary to repeal the second amendment. The second amendment should not be repealed because: guns help citizens defend themselves, guns help in decreasing crime rate, strict guns laws will give criminals a competitive edge and the government will try to repeal other significant parts of constitution. Body There are various reasons due to which the second amendment should not be repeal and citizens should be allowed to possess firearms. One of the main reasons is that citizens of US use it to protect themselves against criminal activity. A very well recognized criminologist named Gary Kleck stated that victims that have already experienced crime conducted against them and if they owned a fire arm while the crime was taking place, the changes of property loss and harm to these victims is quite low as compared to those victims who did not bare at the time when the crime was occurring (Valdez, 2003, p.106). A second reason due to which gun laws should not be put into operation and 2nd amendment should not be repealed is that if citizens have arms and ammunition, the total crime rate declines. ...
minals are rational decision makers and before conducting any activity (crime) they weigh the benefits and costs that are associated with that decision (Vito, 2012, p.65). For example: A criminal may conduct a cost benefit analysis before committing a crime and if he/she realizes that the possible victim may be carrying a weapon and may use it to defend himself, the criminal might not conduct criminal activity as he might fear death caused due to use of arms by the citizens. There should not be strict gun control laws because such laws will give criminals a competitive advantage to criminals over law abiding citizens. This is because such laws can only control guns that are licensed to the name of a law abiding citizen who has faced the difficulty of going through a proper procedure of obtain license to carry arms. On the other hand, the criminals do not get their guns registered and do not even obtain license for their weapons. If strict gun control laws are put into action, only a total of 270 million guns that are registered to the names of citizens will be controlled while huge number of guns that are owned by the criminals will continue to remain in operation while crimes are committed(Small arms survey, 2007, p.39). These laws are even violating the rule of equal treatment as by creating rigid gun control laws the government is working with a biased attitude against the law abiding citizens and is favoring the criminals in US. If the policy makers are allowed to repeal the 2nd Amendment, they will follow the same procedure to repeal other pieces of legislation that protects the US citizens from the tyranny of the government. There are several pieces of constitution such as the 1st amendment which gives liberty of freedom of speech to the citizens and this
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“GUN LAWS: Should we disarm citizens and disregard the amendment to Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1476216-gun-laws-should-we-disarm-citizens-and-disregard
(GUN LAWS: Should We Disarm Citizens and Disregard the Amendment to Research Paper)
“GUN LAWS: Should We Disarm Citizens and Disregard the Amendment to Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1476216-gun-laws-should-we-disarm-citizens-and-disregard.
Finally it would suggest some new strategies that could be implemented toward gun and gang crime control among the youth. Although studies are deeply at odds regarding the actual cause of the alarming growth of juvenile delinquency, all converge at the point that policy formulation along with effective law enforcement and other socio-psychological intervention is essentially required to address the issue.
And we are not talking merely about health issues here. Rather we look into something more dangerous. And that is gun ownership. Gun ownership has been controversial because of the many violent crimes connected to shootings and killings with the use of guns.
In fact, it was a requirement in some colonies for men to carry muskets especially when visiting the church. Weapons were a sign of honor, dignity and courage. The colonists that explored the New World were threatened by the Indians. For security against attacks, every able bodied man had to have arms.
Second Amendment and Gun Laws Introduction The issue of civilian gun ownership has caused a very heated debate and must be looked at in a very critical manner. Needless to say, there are those who believe that civilians should not be allowed to legally own a gun.
However, under certain terms the limitation of these rights is regarded as necessary so that other rights are secured. Such case exists in regard to the right of US citizens to have access to ammunition. The particular issue is set under examination in this paper.
No hostile Indians and little threat from wild animals; the government is stable and elected by a democratic process and the citizens of the country have the most powerful armed force ever assembled by humankind in addition to several levels of law enforcement that protect
The National Rifle Association has grown to be the most influential lobby group in the United States today because of its vehement opposition to gun control. This paper will not pretend to provide the ultimate solution to this profound
In 2008, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision regarding the 2nd Amendment. In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Supreme Court ruled that an individual’s right to bear a firearm is protected
As compared to the United Kingdom that has strict gun control laws, the United Kingdom has allowed the states to enact laws which vary on the issue of gun possession and use (Alters, 2011).
From the research, it is apparent that guns do not guarantee the safety of police officers and the community at large. Whereas cases of successful defense using guns are possible, it is imperative to note that such cases are quite rare for civilian gun users who reside within urban regions. In that regard, those who possess guns should re-evaluate their perceptions of gun control.
17 Pages(4250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic GUN LAWS: Should we disarm citizens and disregard the amendment to bear arms for FREE!