Nobody downloaded yet

GUN LAWS: Should we disarm citizens and disregard the amendment to bear arms - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Repealing the Second Amendment Name University Repealing the Second Amendment The 2nd Amendment of the constitution of US allows the citizens to carry arms and ammunition with themselves (Charles, 2009, p.199). For several years the second amendment has come under scrutiny due to the enormous amount of gun related criminal issues…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.9% of users find it useful
GUN LAWS: Should we disarm citizens and disregard the amendment to bear arms
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"GUN LAWS: Should we disarm citizens and disregard the amendment to bear arms"

Download file to see previous pages The number of guns registered to the civilians of United States is quite high, but this does not mean that it is necessary to repeal the second amendment. The second amendment should not be repealed because: guns help citizens defend themselves, guns help in decreasing crime rate, strict guns laws will give criminals a competitive edge and the government will try to repeal other significant parts of constitution. Body There are various reasons due to which the second amendment should not be repeal and citizens should be allowed to possess firearms. One of the main reasons is that citizens of US use it to protect themselves against criminal activity. A very well recognized criminologist named Gary Kleck stated that victims that have already experienced crime conducted against them and if they owned a fire arm while the crime was taking place, the changes of property loss and harm to these victims is quite low as compared to those victims who did not bare at the time when the crime was occurring (Valdez, 2003, p.106). A second reason due to which gun laws should not be put into operation and 2nd amendment should not be repealed is that if citizens have arms and ammunition, the total crime rate declines. ...
minals are rational decision makers and before conducting any activity (crime) they weigh the benefits and costs that are associated with that decision (Vito, 2012, p.65). For example: A criminal may conduct a cost benefit analysis before committing a crime and if he/she realizes that the possible victim may be carrying a weapon and may use it to defend himself, the criminal might not conduct criminal activity as he might fear death caused due to use of arms by the citizens. There should not be strict gun control laws because such laws will give criminals a competitive advantage to criminals over law abiding citizens. This is because such laws can only control guns that are licensed to the name of a law abiding citizen who has faced the difficulty of going through a proper procedure of obtain license to carry arms. On the other hand, the criminals do not get their guns registered and do not even obtain license for their weapons. If strict gun control laws are put into action, only a total of 270 million guns that are registered to the names of citizens will be controlled while huge number of guns that are owned by the criminals will continue to remain in operation while crimes are committed(Small arms survey, 2007, p.39). These laws are even violating the rule of equal treatment as by creating rigid gun control laws the government is working with a biased attitude against the law abiding citizens and is favoring the criminals in US. If the policy makers are allowed to repeal the 2nd Amendment, they will follow the same procedure to repeal other pieces of legislation that protects the US citizens from the tyranny of the government. There are several pieces of constitution such as the 1st amendment which gives liberty of freedom of speech to the citizens and this ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“GUN LAWS: Should we disarm citizens and disregard the amendment to Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1476216-gun-laws-should-we-disarm-citizens-and-disregard
(GUN LAWS: Should We Disarm Citizens and Disregard the Amendment to Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/history/1476216-gun-laws-should-we-disarm-citizens-and-disregard.
“GUN LAWS: Should We Disarm Citizens and Disregard the Amendment to Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1476216-gun-laws-should-we-disarm-citizens-and-disregard.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
GUN CONTROL LAWS
.... At the same time, there is equal denial on this claim from the opponents. “They argue that controls often create burdens for law-abiding citizens and infringe upon constitutional rights provided by the Second Amendment” (Gun Control). The opponents show little satisfaction on the measures furnished for the public safety. The two most significant laws passed as an outcome of federal control are National Firearms Act of 1934 and Gun Control Act of 1968. Both these laws had equal acceptance and opposition (Gun Control). Consequences of gun crimes in the United States Gun...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
Right to Bear Arms
...? Every person has the right to live in a safe environment. One of the many reasons why people choose to live in a certain place is safety. It is notjust personal safety for some, but family safety for most. Every person needs to feel secure where they live, where they work. And we are not talking merely about health issues here. Rather we look into something more dangerous. And that is gun ownership. Gun ownership has been controversial because of the many violent crimes connected to shootings and killings with the use of guns. Legalization of gun ownership is part of the second amendment, where it states that “a...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
The 2nd Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms
...can become a weapon of offence either accidentally or intentionally. For that matter, the first part of the provision of this amendment, “well-regulated militia” is advocated by pro gun control laws. This provision is interpreted as that gun possession is only applied to official defensive forces such as the National Guard. On the other hand, gun lovers support the interpretation grown out the second part of the amendment which states that, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This means that citizens can have guns and the government...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Sociology of Law Class-Second Amendment- Rights to Bear Arms
...individual ownership of any form of firearm. In their interpretation of the Amendment, the District of Columbia law did not provide for citizens to carry any unregistered gun and from registering any firearm. Additionally, the law provided a different provision that guarded against carrying of guns without a legal government issued license, transferring the entire authority to license at the discretion to the chief of police. In was therefore seen that the court therefore provided a de facto prohibition on any individual owning a gun. The Second Amendment: an in-context examination The United State’s...
9 Pages(2250 words)Term Paper
Second Amendment and Gun Laws
..., the criminals will still be able to access the guns and continual to harm law abiding citizens who are helpless because they cannot defend themselves. For a long time, the government has failed to cramp down on illegal firearms dealers, and this has mean that criminals have arms. In other words, the government has hugely failed to protect the lives of people especially those of law abiding citizens. Every day, incidents of home burglary cases in which the victims get harmed sometimes to the extent of losing their lives happen across the United States. In this case, the individuals should be able to be given the right to...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Gun laws
.... As such, this brief analysis will seek to consider the debate from the perspective of the pro-gun control movement. In such a way, it will be the express goal of this author to relate to the reader some of the most powerful arguments in favor of further gun control and the rationale behind these. As such, it is the author’s hope that the reader will gain a more nuanced and complete understanding of the main arguments for further gun control by an analysis of the following 4 arguments: the Second Amendment does not, nor did it ever, provide for individual gun rights, the high rate of gun related violence and death, as well as the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Gun Laws
...Amendment to be “obsolete; or is intended solely to guard against suppression of state militias by the central government and therefore restricted in scope by that intent; or does not guarantee a right that is absolute, but one that can be limited by reasonable requirements” (Krouse, 2002). However, most American’s agree that the Second Amendment does allow law-abiding citizens to own guns for protection and hunting. Gun control advocates generally want the weapon that kills the most people, handguns, to be illegal but are willing to compromise on rifles and shotguns. In this way, the right to bear...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Gun Control and Second Amendment
...of acting in concert for the common defense” which manifests that militia refers specifically to those who have been given authority by the federal government (Guncite, n.d.).. The term ‘the people’ has been used selectively in the US Constitution. In amendment 1: “Congress shall make no law ... abridging ... the right of the people peaceably to assemble.” U.S. Constitution article 1 and 2, clause 1: “The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second year by the People of the several States”. These cited sections of the US Constitution seem to favour the anti-gun control faction that the use of ‘people’ implies the individual therefore the Second...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Gun Laws
... prominent businessmen, political leaders, and celebrities among others (Lott, 2010). However, security concerns that lead to the formulation and implementation of gun laws are experienced across the populations, and every single individual is equally vulnerable. Although there places where gun laws seek to integrate all persons subject to approval, these laws are primarily selective. All people face security threats across their social, economic, or political status, and gun laws should take this into account. Conclusion The debate on gun laws is diverse and dynamic. Striking a balance to address the underlying issues and concerns amid this diversity and dynamism is a challenge. However, the selective aspect of majority gun laws... is not...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
2nd Amendment (Right to Bear Arms)
...The 2nd Amendment: Right to Bear Arms The 2nd Amendment: Right to Bear Arms The Amendment II to the US constitution made changes to the US Bills of Rights which protects people’s right to keep and bear arms. Prior to the District of Columbia v. Heller decision by the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment had been the hot topic for debates among US law professionals because the Amendment II was vague in itself. In 2008, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision regarding the 2nd Amendment. In District of Columbia v....
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic GUN LAWS: Should we disarm citizens and disregard the amendment to bear arms for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us