Download file to see previous pages...
The Court ruling also says that an individual can use firearms for ‘traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home’ (FindLaw, n.d.). The Amendment II as passed by the Congress states that “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (cited in Young, 2007, p.222).
The Second Amendment came into effect in the second half of the 20th century. As described in a web document (‘Constitutional Topic: The Second Amendment’, n.d.), gun control advocates perceived the Amendment in another way referring to the mounting level of violence in the society and the role played by firearms in those issues; and in contrast to this view, firearm enthusiasts claimed that the opponents’ arguments are against people’s freedom and hence they interpreted the 2nd Amendment just as fiercely. Evidently, some phrases in the Second Amendment paved the way for a series of debates. The English Bill of Rights 1689 has greatly influenced the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution. The right to have arms has been considered as one of the fundamental natural right throughout the English history. In District Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court makes reference to the English rights concerning the possession of arms by individuals.
The growing threat of terrorism in Western countries, particularly in the United States, justifies the Second Amendment. Since US is considered to be prone to terror attacks since the 9/11, this Amendment would raise the level of security of US people. Referring to the increasing rates of crimes in the country including robbery, kidnapping, and sexual assaults, this Amendment would help people to be more self-defensive. However, some law professionals do not support Amendment II arguing that this would worsen the gun crimes in the country.
As stated in some documents (‘The Second Amendment to the United
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Different times have seen different interpretations of the statutes of the constitution in accordance with the needs and cognizance of the ruling class, and to a lesser extent, the citizens of the United States. What the founders of the nation meant by those statues has been lost to the numerous changes.
In fact, it was a requirement in some colonies for men to carry muskets especially when visiting the church. Weapons were a sign of honor, dignity and courage. The colonists that explored the New World were threatened by the Indians. For security against attacks, every able bodied man had to have arms.
The establishment of the amendment recognized that the government could not dictate on the people’s rights. In addition, the individual freedom and security provision for liberty and life was recognized when the amendment was passed. The paper looks at the historical attacks on the 2nd Amendment rights by the Democratic Party and the administration of the past leadership up to the current Obama administration.
In the year 1868, this situation underwent a far-reaching change. This was due to the ratification of the 14th Amendment, which strictly precluded any state from depriving the property, life, or liberty of any person, in the absence of the due process of law.
Those against the second amendment state that due to the second amendment, the quantity of guns in the hands of the citizens of US has increased and due to this gun violence has even increased. A total of 270 million firearms are registered in the name of the civilians of the US (Small arms survey, 2007, p.39).
However, under certain terms the limitation of these rights is regarded as necessary so that other rights are secured. Such case exists in regard to the right of US citizens to have access to ammunition. The particular issue is set under examination in this paper.
Simultaneous with the ratification of Amendment 2, nine other amendments were ratified on December 15, 1791. These are:
Amendment 2, together with the 10 other amendments, was probably considered very important
Hence, during the end of June 2008, referring to the case of the District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision which later came to be attributed as the Second Amendment to the Constitution (Library of Congress, “United
As compared to the United Kingdom that has strict gun control laws, the United Kingdom has allowed the states to enact laws which vary on the issue of gun possession and use (Alters, 2011).
From the research, it is apparent that guns do not guarantee the safety of police officers and the community at large. Whereas cases of successful defense using guns are possible, it is imperative to note that such cases are quite rare for civilian gun users who reside within urban regions. In that regard, those who possess guns should re-evaluate their perceptions of gun control.
17 Pages(4250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic 2nd Amendment (Right to Bear Arms) for FREE!