We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

If the second amendment protects the right to bear arms, can state and federal government strictly limit access to ammunition un - Research Paper Example

Comments (0)
If the second amendment protects the right to bear arms, can state and federal government strictly limit access to ammunition under the constitution? 1. Introduction The recognition of rights by the law is usually considered as the only prerequisite for the full protection of these rights…
Download full paper
If the second amendment protects the right to bear arms, can state and federal government strictly limit access to ammunition un
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
If the second amendment protects the right to bear arms, can state and federal government strictly limit access to ammunition un

Download file to see previous pages... Emphasis is given to the following question: can state and the federal government set limits to the access to ammunition under the constitution? Since ammunition cannot be used without guns the reference to the potential restrictions on gun possession has been unavoidable. Indeed, if such restrictions are lawful for gun possession then a similar practice could be also justified for ammunition. A problem seems to exist though in regard to the following issue: could a different treatment for the access to ammunition, as compared to the gun possession, be justified? This issue is analyzed further below trying to evaluate whether the state and the federal government have the power to intervene in such right, as the access to ammunition. 2. The potentials of state and federal government to strictly limit access to ammunition under the constitution 2.1 Prohibitions related to guns and constitution Due to the Second Amendment, gun holders in USA are secured as of their right in regard ‘to handgun possession’ (Carter 2012, p.191). Still, many states have tried to set limits in the above right ignoring the relevant provisions of the Second Amendment. In 2008 the Supreme Court had to examine the lawfulness of the prohibitions imposed by the District of Columbia in regard to the possession of handgun at home (District of Columbia v. Heller 2008). ...
It is rather a right that is depended on the legislation applied locally, i.e. in each state (Spitzer 2009). At this point the role of the Second Amendment can be described as follows: the Second Amendment aims to secure the citizen’s right to possess guns, as this right is recognized by local legislation; therefore, no conflict exists between the Federal constitution and the Second Amendment (Spitzer 2009). However, no limitation seems to exist in regard to the potential of a state to set limits to gun possession. Indeed, as noted in Rohrbaugh v State of West Virginia, the limitations set by the state in regard to gun possession can be considered as justified since the state has acted for protecting its citizens; in this context, the Court has ruled that no violation of the Second Amendment has taken place due to the limitations that the state set in gun possession (Rohrbaugh v. State of West Virginia, 2004, in Massaro 2009, p.371). Boyes-Watson (2013) explains that the key reason for the introduction of the Second Amendment has been ‘the protection of the right of the states to form militia from defense’ (p.333). In addition, Featherstone and Gardiner (1982) noted that the Second Amendment aimed to secure the power of individuals not just to protect their state but also to protect their own rights. Therefore, by its scope, the Second Amendment cannot be limited by federal government, meaning that the federal government has not the power to set limits to the possession of guns. However, the potential of the state to set limits to gun possession, ignoring the Second Amendment, has caused a series of conflicts. In the past, most states used to regulate in regard to gun possession without taking into consideration the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Right to Bear Arms
And we are not talking merely about health issues here. Rather we look into something more dangerous. And that is gun ownership. Gun ownership has been controversial because of the many violent crimes connected to shootings and killings with the use of guns.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
The 2nd Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms
In fact, it was a requirement in some colonies for men to carry muskets especially when visiting the church. Weapons were a sign of honor, dignity and courage. The colonists that explored the New World were threatened by the Indians. For security against attacks, every able bodied man had to have arms.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Domestic Crime Rate and the Right to Bear Arms
In the year 1868, this situation underwent a far-reaching change. This was due to the ratification of the 14th Amendment, which strictly precluded any state from depriving the property, life, or liberty of any person, in the absence of the due process of law.
16 Pages(4000 words)Research Paper
GUN LAWS: Should we disarm citizens and disregard the amendment to bear arms
Those against the second amendment state that due to the second amendment, the quantity of guns in the hands of the citizens of US has increased and due to this gun violence has even increased. A total of 270 million firearms are registered in the name of the civilians of the US (Small arms survey, 2007, p.39).
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
How should the second amendment be interpreted
Const. amend. II). The wording of this provision in the Second Amendment is not self-evident and being such, it has given much commentaries and interpretation due to relatively few Supreme Court decisions that should have elucidated on this constitutional provision.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
Gun Control and Second Amendment
The National Rifle Association has grown to be the most influential lobby group in the United States today because of its vehement opposition to gun control. This paper will not pretend to provide the ultimate solution to this profound
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
2nd amendment - the right to bare arms- US Constitution
Simultaneous with the ratification of Amendment 2, nine other amendments were ratified on December 15, 1791. These are: Amendment 2, together with the 10 other amendments, was probably considered very important
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
2nd Amendment (Right to Bear Arms)
In 2008, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision regarding the 2nd Amendment. In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Supreme Court ruled that an individual’s right to bear a firearm is protected
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
What were the historical origins of the Second Amendments protection to keep and bear arms
ns at first had the culture of carrying arms with them for normal life purposes; that is protection, maintaining order in the society, and hunting for food. As time went by in their new settlement areas in America, conflicts developed, and they had to have arms for protection
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Gun Control community and police safety vs right to bear arms

From the research, it is apparent that guns do not guarantee the safety of police officers and the community at large. Whereas cases of successful defense using guns are possible, it is imperative to note that such cases are quite rare for civilian gun users who reside within urban regions. In that regard, those who possess guns should re-evaluate their perceptions of gun control.

17 Pages(4250 words)Research Paper
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic If the second amendment protects the right to bear arms, can state and federal government strictly limit access to ammunition un for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us