This research is being carried out to comparatively analyze the perspectives and actions of the United States and the Soviet Union in intervening in the crisis, and in mitigating it. Any mention of this issue in the United States is normally to the 1962 Cuban missile crisis…
Download file to see previous pages...
The two nations have some valid grounds for assigning different relevance to different truths, and even to similar truths. Apparently, the truths themselves, regardless how popular, understood, or overlooked, are similar for both (Fursenko & Naftali 1997). Furthermore, as claimed by Fursenko and Naftali (1997), even nowadays, the crisis is not accurately known. Scholars on both sides have concentrated on how the events of the crisis have made subsequent leaders more cautious and more keenly sensitive to the importance of preventing decisions that could provoke another war. However, there is insufficient knowledge in the United States as to the reason that incident is referred to by the Soviet as the ‘Caribbean crisis’, and how it may be critically considered as originating even partly from the U.S. decisions (Hirschbein 1997, 137). There is insufficient knowledge in the Soviet as to the reason it is appropriately viewed in the U.S. as a crisis caused by the covert entrance of Soviet medium-range missiles into Cuba. And in these two nations there is inadequate focus on and knowledge of the entire interaction process, including not just conflicting points of view but conflicting paradigms of significant truth, or distinct groups of realities (Garthoff 1989). As stated by Nathan (1992), especially dissimilar base levels of transparency of documents or source materials in both nations complicate the issue of trying to attain some kind of consolidated historical and political point of view. The Cuban Missile Crisis: Comparing the Perspectives of U.S. and the Soviet Union The Soviet Union and the United States are superpowers with global ambitions, and at times those ambitions come to blows. Crisis management is needed if conflicts...
This research aims to evaluate and present the Soviet Union and the United States as superpowers with global ambitions, and at times those ambitions come to blows. Crisis management is needed if conflicts occur; but crisis avoidance rooted in political control and recognition of dissimilarities is much to be desired. Reductions and regulations of arms control are vital in themselves and since they can positively influence political affairs. Nuclear war avoidance, and thus avoidance of any war implicating the Soviet Union and the United States, is of the greatest concern. Analyzing the experience and understanding the importance of the missile crisis of 1962 can help both nations to ascertain not only that this problem never happens again, but also that a bigger crisis never arises. The United States focused on crisis management. This inclination is true generally, and with regard to analysis of the Cuban missile crisis. In contrast, in the Soviet Union the common tendency and utmost attention paid to the 1962 Caribbean crisis has been aimed at improving crisis avoidance and political acceptance, instead of crisis management. Strangely invalidating the common stereotypes, the Americans have been moderate, cynical pragmatists, believing that, unfortunately, conflicts will arise and should be cautiously handled, whereas the Soviets have seemed to be hopeful, if not totally unrealistic, in claiming that crises can and should be avoided by political co-operation.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Comparative Analysis of American and Soviet Perspectives on the 1962 Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/history/1392776-comparative-analysis-of-american-and-soviet-perspectives-on-the-1962-cuban-missile-crisis
(Comparative Analysis of American and Soviet Perspectives on the 1962 Essay)
“Comparative Analysis of American and Soviet Perspectives on the 1962 Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1392776-comparative-analysis-of-american-and-soviet-perspectives-on-the-1962-cuban-missile-crisis.
Impact on international Trade vii. Conclusion Abstract The Cuban missile crisis is a turning point in history, for after the two World Wars; it was the third time that two of the most powerful nations came closer to a nuclear conflict. The conflict lasted for a total of 13 days between the United States on one side and Cuba and Soviet Union on the other.
For quite a long time the US had defended its role of being the super power and had played a big role in controlling any nuclear plants and equipment all over the world. Soviet Union had been a super power for a long and was not ready to lose its position that easily.
It was during the breakfast on October 16th that President Kennedy acquired information from the Intelligence bureau about Soviet Unions secret missile base in Cuba. Soviet foreign minister Andrei Gromyko met the President Kennedy and he denied any kind of threat caused by the missile base to the U.S.
te and isolated event, however, reflection over the contemporary international political situation would reveal the fact that foundation of the same was already prepared and undercurrent of political tension regarding attaining upper hand over international situation between the
It was a provocative political movement where US armed forces tried to takeover Cuban command where Soviet leaders in Cuba were prepared to employ nuclear weapons in order to defend the island in case of
Many historians tend to believe that the handling of the Cuban missile crisis by the then United States president J.F. Kennedy was a success. On the other hand the quick administration response from J.F. Kennedy formed a core basis on which other nations like the United States should deploy when dealing with other nations like Iran.
The Cuban Missile crisis brought a lot of confusion between the world super powers: the United States and Russia. This was because the two countries were in a competition to gain world influence. The Soviet Union was for communism and hence advocated for it. The United States on the hand greatly championed for capitalism.
During the World War 1, the major superpowers in the world conflicted in one of the most deadly conflicts. In the conflict that lasted for five years, the warring countries used their sophisticated weaponry and machines to
Responding to the failed Bay of Pigs invasion that took place in 1961 as well as the presence of American ballistic missiles in Italy and Turkey which was against the USSR with Moscow within range, the leader of the Soviet Union agreed to the request by Cuba to
The US raised concerns about the ongoing placement of offensive weapons close to its boundaries. After intense negotiation between the leaders of the Soviet Union and the US, the USSR resolved to dismantle the weapons
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Comparative Analysis of American and Soviet Perspectives on the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis for FREE!