Type 2 Diabetes - Essay Example

Type 2 Diabetes Introduction Legal and Ethical issues encountered during health care provision arises from the difference between core areas of law and ethics in health. For instance, during the type 2 Diabetic test, all patients must be assured of the best proven diagnosis and therapy. Many of the diabetic tests being carried out in clinics do not meet the required ethical standards. Health care promoters like Doctors face direct involvement with many ethical issues (Type 2 Diabetes 2015). They are vital in decision making, and thus, making significant ethical implications. Type 2 Diabetes patients trust Doctors to act on their discretion, meaning he is left to what he feels is necessary. But as research shows, some incidents present ethical dilemma to Doctors making very few act to the best course of action. Many Doctors also have issues presenting information to patients regarding testing of Type 2 Diabetes. How a doctor perceives many of the Diabetic questions could therefore be of a big interest to his patients’. From the discussion, we find out that the legalization of some ethical issues would be a positive move towards protecting the patient and the healthcare provider. Legalization of euthanasia would be meaningful to type 2 Diabetic patient undergoing server pain. Legalization to autonomy gave Diabetic patients the freedom to withdraw from hospital bed at their own will. What does Legislation mean in Type 2 Diabetes? Legalization in Type 2 Diabetes refers to creating accommodative rules and policies that will protect and harbour workers infected by Type 2 Diabetes. Type 2 Diabetes should not keep an employer away from the work place. A worker should not be fired or suspended because he or she is suffering from Diabetes. Federal laws have been put in place to protect the rights of workers infected by Diabetes unless you pose a direct threat to other workers. The distinction between Legal and Ethical issues encountered during health care provision to type 2 Diabetic patients arises from the difference between core areas of law and ethics in health (Ali, Khan, Soyoye and Erlem). Importance of Legislation in Diabetes Type 2 Type 2 Diabetes patients too have rights at the work place. But as research shows, many Diabetic workers still feel uncomfortable and stigmatized at the work place. Many Doctors also have issues presenting information to patients regarding testing of Type 2 Diabetes. Legislation is important in protecting Diabetic workers in the work environment. Some of the importance of Legislation of Type 2 Diabetes includes. Employers don’t have to disclose their diseases status - Legislation on Type 2 prohibits the employer from availing any conditions to make the affected disclose the fact that he is affected by Type 2 Diabetes. Type 2 Diabetes laws compel employers to issue employees off from work due to his or her serious health condition. These laws ensure an immediate medical leaf in case of a Diabetes related condition. Legislation in the employment sector offers employees with Type 2 Diabetes a chance to participate in off limit jobs. Employment in some fields such as firefighting requires employees to meet some guidelines which are within the frameworks of legislative laws (NHS, 2014). Laws that protect Type 2 Diabetes patients protect patients from discrimination at the work place due to the disability he or she is suffering from e.g. The Equality ACT of 2010 in the UK which protects the equity of all workers at the workplace regardless of disability. Understanding of Health Promotion. Health promotion is the raising of Health standards of an individual or person in your society or your community. It entails improving, supporting or advancing the health status and giving it a priority on the list of agendas (Defining Health Promotion, 2015).Health promotion helps to empower individuals to have more control of their health over what affects their lives. Models and Approaches to health Promotion Social and Economic Determinants of health are normally outside the control of individuals. In this case, the two major aspects of health, having improved health and more control of it, is the most significant while looking into health promotion. Workplace Health promotion as the collective effort by employers, employees and the community to improve the health and wellbeing of people in the workplace. It is attained through a collective effort in improving the working environment, involvement of all workers in the whole process and encouraging individual health development (Examining Health Approaches). Naidoo and Willis suggested that workplace health promotion established a major priority setting for health promotion in the 21st century (75). It directly affects the physical, economic and social welfare of workers through to their families and society in general. Models of Health Promotions outlines that Health promotion offers a foundation for the provision of health services to a large population set up. The Work Place is being perceived as a significant arena for Health campaigns of different kinds. Unfortunately, the fact that the workplace is a fundamental foundation for health campaigns has not been fully accepted. In some states, there are reduced numbers of occupation. Ethical theory in decision-making These theories are based on ethical principles to emphasize different aspects on an ethical dilemma leading to an ethically right decision of the ethical theory. Individuals bare their choices of ethical theory due to their life experiences. Deontology- Thus theory states that people should follow their obligations when doing an analysis of a dilemma. The individual follows his or her to another person because upholding ones duty is what is ethically correct to him. For instance, a deontologist will keep a promise to friend and follow them. Deontology lays a foundation for one to choose the duties of others over himself. A shortcoming of this theory is that there is no basis for deciding an individual’s duties. Utilitarianism-The theory assumes the power to predict the consequences of an action. The choice that benefits the majority is normally the choice that is ethically correct. There are two kinds of utilitarianism, act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is just the definition as it is while Rule utilitarianism takes into consideration the law and majors with families. Rights – In this case the rights set by the society are adhered to and protected by the society. The rights are beloved to be correct since they are followed by a majority that is the community. Single persons can also put the rights if they have the powers to act like so. Virtue- It is a theory in which someone is judged by his character rather than his abnormal behaviour. It takes a person’s moral onto account when rating his irregular behaviour. One disadvantage o this theory is that it does not take into action the change of the person’s character. General and Specific Beneficence: beneficence is an action that promotes ones interest for his sake. It is significant to understand the concept beneficence from other moral claims. The benefit is normally defined by the persons themselves. Specific beneficence is normally directed to particular groups while general beneficence is directed to all people. It also creates a supportive environment for the people. Autonomy: This involves respecting a person’s right to make their personal decisions. It involved teaching people to capable of making their personal choices and supports them on their individual choices. The principle prohibits forcing people to do things against their wishes. Non- maleficence: This process means to do no harm. The principle advocates against inflicting harm on people, not causing pain to them, not being offensive and even avoiding killing them. The Principle of Justice: It entails treating people fairly, and not favouring some people and disfavouring some group of people. It advocates for full adherence to the law and hinders acting in a non-discriminatory manner. Distributive Justice involves sharing of scarce resources in the community in a fair way. In practical, patients should get what they deserve and an equal share of what they need. Conclusion Health promotion works for the good of the people if its actions are for the best available interest of the people, yet it may still face many challenging ethical issues. Ethics in health promotion normally involve the evaluation of principles in order to come up with programs that can promote health. Health professionals are also encouraged to act in a manner that will tend to be for the public good. In general, a professional health promoter must show their desire to act in the interest of the public good. Participatory evaluation should also be carried out to encourage collaboration between different health promoters. References Scriven, A. (2010). Promoting Health: A practical Guide. 6th ed. London: Elsevier. Ali, A., Khan, T., Soyoye, E., and Erlem, V. Type 2 Diabetes. PowerPoint. “Defining Health Promotion.” University Campus Oldham. PowerPoint. “Models of Health Promotion.” University Campus Oldham. PowerPoint. “Models and Approaches to Health Promotion.” University Campus Oldham. PowerPoint. Naidoo and Willis. Chapter 5: “Models and Approaches to Health Promotion”. Print. Health, C. A. (2013). Cash. Retrieved from Consensus Action on Salt and Health: http://www.actiononsalt.org.uk/less/what/effect/index.html NHS. (2014, June 18). NHS Choices Your health, your choices. Retrieved from Health A-Z (Type 2 diabetes): http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Diabetes-type2/Pages/Introduction.aspx Nursing, N. C. (2015). Understanding Diabetes. Retrieved from National College of Nursing: http://www.rcn.org.uk/development/practice/diabetes/understanding_diabetes  UK, D. (2015). Diabetes UK Care, Connect Campaign. Retrieved from Diabetes UK What is Diabetes: http://www.diabetes.org.uk/Guide-to-diabetes/What-is-diabetes/?gclid=CN2Xwab2x8ICFaIIwwodHDAASg   Read More