Problems that Prevail in Any Marriage Relationship - Case Study Example

Integrative solution is the best solution to solve conflicts between spouses al affiliation: Normally, it is a dream of every couple to share a peaceful, happy and long lasting life. However, this is not the case for many families, which end up in separation or ultimately divorce. In these instances, many things become at stake. Children, for example, become factors of custody as each parent struggles to get a share of them. On the same course, wealth induces a battleground, which in many instances ends up in court or dispute resolution panels responsible for judging who should get a higher percentage of the entire wealth. It, therefore, is impossible to resolve couple differences amicably and at an early stage before resulting into serious problems. Integrative solution is one technique, which has been applied for decades in resolving spouse conflicts. The paper looks at to what extent it permeates conclusive resolutions. Mitchell, Bullard and Mudd (1962) conducted a research on various areas that generate conflicts within families providing important findings. According to the research, two eminent problems prevail in any marriage relationship. Conceivably, these problems continue to pass from generation to generation raising important questions on the existing resolution mechanisms. Evidently, it is not clear whether people give up on their marriage or just lack appropriate mechanisms for resolving their differences. However, the fact remains that the increasing number of separation and divorce scenarios demonstrates failures. According to Mitchell, Bullard and Mudd (1962, 96) the extent to which husbands agree with their wives was a key question in the study. Contrary to expectations, the problem field extends to a large area. Based on the research, the problems with a marriage range from economic, socio-biographical, parental relationships, and personal factors contributing. For example, the education and attitude of any partner dictate how he reacts to a given situation. Couples with limited education participate less in any sensible talks and would rather resort to separation or divorce. The same scenario applies to people with advanced education who find it inevitable to engage their partners amicably. As a result, many couples end up taking courts as their only solution. In the same light, materialistic pressures as well as fear of transition into husband and wives have threatened existence of proper marriages based on Mitchell, Bullard and Mudd studies. From this perspective, cultural implications also reign in marriage conflicts hence making an integral factor in marriage resolution. In essence, marriage is a continuous process that requires input, attention and most importantly recognition of conflict resolution elements. Therefore, it is a non-disputable fact that the unrealistic nature of solutions towards couple differences have induced more problems instead of providing a lifelong answer. Apparently, many marriage counsellors concentrate on funds and personal differences, as main causes of spouse conflicts. Mitchell, Bullard and Mudd (1962, 112) notes that areas of conflicts vary depending on different factors including economic, socio-biographical, parental relationships and personal determinants. For this reason, integrative solutions give a more promising lead towards ending natural or motivated differences between couples. Contrary to Mitchell, Bullard and Mudd who gave a comprehensive research on the important elements of family conflict, Sanford (2012, 281) focuses attention on communication of emotion during conflict resolution. According to Sanford, communication is an essential part of conflict resolution; however, in many instances emotions prevent amicable coherence. As a result, most spouses conflicts have failed to offer futuristic solutions. The study by Sanford (2012) concentrates on three important areas of research in an attempt to provide important resolution tactics. According to the article, the clarity of emotions, recognition, and most importantly distinction during communication remains inevitable during conflict resolution. It, therefore, is important to unveil a clear communication plan when resolving any spouse difference. According to the article, people demonstrate a strong emotional sense of rejection or reception when resolving conflicts with their mates. These emotions play an important role in steering the direction any conflict takes. Monitoring the emotions, therefore, remains an inevitable step towards successful resolution of conflicts. Sanford (2012, 301) reiterates that hard and soft emotions are inevitable when resolving different conflicts. Certainly, the reactions are important for enabling a clear-cut system. Nevertheless, encoding and decoding of information infer to serious resolution strategies important for successful development. Notably, spouses may show a given degree of accuracy, but this does not play any role in conflict resolution unless one is able to recognise the extent to which any solution prevails. Above all, contextual and event specific effects of communication provide assessment techniques important for a clear perception of emotion. Whether hard or soft emotions are imminent for conflict resolution among spouses. Therefore, the hypothesized study by Sanford (2012) proves beyond reasonable doubt that conflict resolution among spouses remains a stepwise process. For this reason, integrative solutions involving a comprehensive study of emotions play an imperative role in unveiling reaction. Indeed, this is important for conflict resolution. Cooperation during conflict resolution is a tall dream for many people. In many instances, women seek refuge from their parents as men divulge into drinking sprees. Ultimately, the children suffer due to lack of cooperation among spouses. It, therefore, is important to find common interactive zones that promote understanding. Generally, cooperation may be difficult to achieve when resolving conflicts, but a well-organised negotiation often result into proper resolutions. Aronson, Wilson and Akert in their 2005 study demonstrate how people can work together for success. In as much as they recognise cooperation as a key element of conflict resolution, they accepted that this is only possible for partners with minor differences. For instance, partners who disagree on who should wash the dishes, have a higher chance of finding a common ground contrary to those disputing a management position in a family property. In the same measure, a long standing interpersonal conflict may induce serious reparations and inevitable by-products. In this light, Aronson, Wilson and Akert recommend peaceful resolution strategies that allow each party to mutually accept differences without inducing hostility. Aronson, Wilson and Akert (2005, 310) also mentions social dilemmas as key blocks to effective conflict resolution. According to the article, many people are bound to lose in an event that everybody prioritizes self-interest. For this reason, response to social dilemmas can either deny or perpetuate successful conflict resolution. Most importantly, increasing cooperation among partners or conflicting people remains a sure way of realising spontaneous growth. Conflicts may introduce hardliners; however, aspects like trust and courage to face the extra ordinary makes it easy for partners to cooperate. According to Aronson, Wilson and Akert, it is important to avoid threats, use effective communication and negotiate in the most friendly way. It also vital to adopt individual behaviour and not group characters, which attract more problems instead of offering solutions. In conclusion, conflicts in marriages do not mark an end to life, but rather a beginning. Depending on how spouses respond to imminent disagreements, marriages are either bound to end or gain rejuvenation. Nevertheless, integrative solutions play an important role in streamlining conflict resolution among spouses. Studies on the different areas of conflict allow one to assess weaknesses, strengths and viable opportunities to exploit as demonstrated by Mitchell, Bullard and Mudd (1962). Similarly, it is imminent to ascertain communication strategies that take cognisance of emotions. Evidently, this allows partners and all stakeholders to effectively encode and decode important signs and signals. On the same note, cooperation among partners play induce quick solutions. spouses who do not cooperate during conflict resolution do not take charge of their emotions. It is vital to understand such partners as further castigation makes them more liable to punitive damages. In this respect, I totally agree with the statement that integrative solutions best solve conflicts. References Aronson E., Wilson T., & Akert R., (2005). social Psychology. Pearson Education International Mitchell, H., Bullard W., & Mudd E. (1962). Areas of Marital Conflict in Successfully and Unsuccessfully Functioning Families. Journal of Health and Human Behaviour, 3 (2), pp. 88-93 Sanford K. (2012).The Communication of Emotion During Conflict in Married Couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, (3), 297–307 Read More