Nobody downloaded yet

Should the U.S. emphasize multilateral over unilateral initiatives in foreign policyC.Q. Researcher, Feb. 2, 2007, vol. 5, issu - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Your Name Here Should the U.S. emphasize multilateral over unilateral initiatives in foreign policy? PRO: Yes, the U.S. should emphasize multilateral over unilateral initiatives because… 1. Multilateral cooperation help build good standing in international arena by improving the American image and reassuring other states about its behavior and goals…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
Should the U.S. emphasize multilateral over unilateral initiatives in foreign policyC.Q. Researcher, Feb. 2, 2007, vol. 5, issu
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Should the U.S. emphasize multilateral over unilateral initiatives in foreign policyC.Q. Researcher, Feb. 2, 2007, vol. 5, issu"

Download file to see previous pages 4. Many important international institutions require multilateral cooperation. 5. Multilateral initiatives allows for more alliances. CONS: No, the U.S. should NOT emphasize multilateral over unilateral initiatives in foreign policy. 1. The U.S. may have a disadvantage in multilateral negotiations because some countries outstrip the American influence in many consensus-oriented fora such as the ASEAN, Asean Regional Forum and APEC. 2. Some of the benefits of multilateralism can be achieved in through other strategies such as bilateral agreements, which sometimes could be more forceful and effective. 3. It is less decisive in addressing immediate threats or issues that need immediate attention. The dominant opinion domestically and internationally is that the United States is better off pursuing a multilateral approach to its foreign policy instead of unilateralism. This is exactly what is being pursued by the current Obama administration. For example, in the current civil war happening in Libya, the US is working with the North Atlantic Territory Organization (NATO) and the Arab League in order to best solve the crisis. When several airstrikes were finally launched against Moammar Gaddhafi’s military installations, they were done within the auspices of NATO and were explicitly projected as international efforts with the French or the British, possibly taking the lead. American policymakers are careful to avoid the failures of the previous administrations in its foreign policies, particularly that which concerned the unilateral invasion of Iraq, including the policies that came to constitute the American War on Terror. The confidence-building capability of multilateral initiatives has been demonstrated by Japan – a state now held in high esteem by most of Asia – after its much derided status during the Second World War. Through its strategy, it was able to achieve a kind of diplomatic influence that sometimes surpasses that of the US. For example, through the years, Japan has cultivated strong economic relationships with member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN). Multilateralism’s benefit for Japan is quite clear. Today, the country has two major East Asian multilateral foreign and security policy options: the first is the ASEAN/ARF structure, which are now consisted of most of the states in Southeast Asia, South Asia and East Asia.1 Then, there was also the case of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which the first Bush administration encouraged and ratified under President Clinton’s watch. This initiative to engage Latin America, wrote Horwitz, helped redirect the foreign policies of thirty-four Western Hemisphere states in favor of closer political and economic ties.2 This engagement also facilitated the pursuit of common goals that led to the solution of common problems such as illegal drugs and immigration. Engaging other states and international institutions makes an initiative legitimate or, at least, provide a semblance of it that might otherwise be perceived as narrow political/military/economic interests of the US. According to Parmar, the popular critique against the recent Bush administration was that it had alienated the world by “by-passing international institutions, flouting international law and norms, and disregarding the interests and opinion of states.3 Anjali ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Should the U.S. emphasize multilateral over unilateral initiatives in Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Should the U.S. Emphasize Multilateral over Unilateral Initiatives in Research Paper)
“Should the U.S. Emphasize Multilateral over Unilateral Initiatives in Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Foreign Policy
It is here that most Americans, if they are watching television, can get a view of the candidates at work and showing what their selling skills to the people of America are. Yet, a truly interested voter will take the time to investigate the issues and determine the truth of what each candidate says about these issues.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
Is democracy making gains in Asia C.Q. Researcher, July 24, 1998, vol. 8, issue 27
Asian middle class is rising 4. Asian countries are progressing in the path of economic growth 5. Asian countries are successful in combining ‘tradition’ and ‘openness to the world’ 6. Human rights movement is gaining momentum CON: No, democracy is NOT making gains in Asia because… 1.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Should the IMF and World Bank cancel all the debts of poor countries C.Q. Researcher, September 28, 2001, vol. 11, issue
The issue stems from the fact that many developing countries have external debt that is too high for them to pay considering the low proportion of their gross domestic product. The external debts of many of these developing countries accumulated to unmanageable levels for a variety of reasons.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
U.S. foreign policy
This expansion was also meant to empower its competition with the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union, countries which were, at that time, considered to be more influential and more financially stable nations than the US.
24 Pages(6000 words)Essay
U.S. foreign policy
This paper is a similar attempt to analyze one of the major stakeholders of US foreign policy: public. In particular, the paper includes discussion and analysis of the perspective as whether public opinion matters in the decision-making process of US foreign policy or not.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Cyber Security Policy Initiatives
The system of technologies, procedure, and observance which are structured for protecting networks, systems, applications and important information from attacks, harm or entrance from unauthorized as well as unrecognized sources is what is known as Cyber security. With the ever evolving cyber world, cyber security is of paramount importance.
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper
Kuwaits Foreign Policy
Because of strategic importance, Kuwait’s foreign policies are often watched with curiosity by the external political observers because if its strategic location in the middle east2. Even though a well-developed country economically,
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper
US Foreign Policy and Nuclear Proliferation
rgy had brought technological advances in nuclear reactors for the generation of electric power and had also increased the possibility of using such technologies for the development of nuclear weapons. The fear that came out of the possibility of a nuclear war or the use of
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
German Foreign Policy
Sound foreign policies usually affect the development agenda of the country. Several factors influence the type of foreign policy that the country would enact. In many cases, foreign policies aim at opening avenues for political relationship, economic relationship, and issues of international relations.
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
U.S. foreign policy: Iran Hostage Crisis
The incident is reported as the greatest failure of diplomatic ties between two countries; Iran violated the internationally accepted and acclaimed law of diplomatic immunity, a very serious crime in International Relations, whereas United States took the option of military operation after the negotiation attempts failed.
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Should the U.S. emphasize multilateral over unilateral initiatives in foreign policyC.Q. Researcher, Feb. 2, 2007, vol. 5, issu for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us