A case in point of a business ethical dilemma is Higgins who is an accountant trainee in his third year of training in a small firm. A senior trainee has been on maternity leave, and Higgin is due to go on leave too. The manager approaches him that before he goes on leave, he must complete some vital reconciliation work which is much complicated. The deadline suggested by the manager is not attainable as the work is so tedious and complex. Higgin feels that his experience is inadequate to complete the work by him alone.
He needs supervision along with him to complete it to the required limit. However, the manager is unwilling to offer help. If he tries to finish the work within the given time limit and fails to meet the quality, Higgin, would face the consequences on his return from leave. He feels partially threatened by his manager and also feels pressure to do what he can for the practice in that difficult moment. This is an absolute business ethical dilemma firstly because, at all costs, he must make a decision at the end of the day.
According to (Jones 1991), the moral intensity will form a basis for investigation in which the moral decisions taken by Higgin are assessed. Whether to do the work or not. Secondly, he has choices to choose from in that situation. There exist different courses of action to pick from in the scenario. Finally, irrespective of the decision he takes one ethical principle must be comprised. In this scenario we have core principles affected. The first is Integrity, should he be open in the scenario?
Or would it be good for him to finish the work that is beyond his ability and without supervision? The next principle is His professional due care and competence. Can the desired quality be achieved in the given time? Another one is his professional character. Can the image of the practice suffer if he attempts to do the work? And what will be the magnitude of the consequences? (Jones 1991). Lastly, his integrity. Will it be questionable?.For one to unravel all this, the following should be done.
Firstly, he ought to recognize this as a dilemma. Then he needs to divide it into its components. Thirdly, he needs to seek additional information from the people involved. It is prudent to identify any professional guidance in the form of law or policy. After that, subject the dilemma into proper analysis and come up with a decision. Lastly, Higgin has to justify the choice of his decision with sound judgment.(Hommadi,2008). In a situation like that of Higgin, he should consider quick facts.
The job that he does is that of a junior staff and in this case he is under pressure because of the leave of his senior. However, the work is beyond his capacity as a trainee at his level. He should consider whether the deadline can be pushed forward until his senior returns to work. He should also find other resources that may be available. To add to that, he should as well identify the policies and guidelines of the practice and code of ethics of his professional. Secondly, reach out to the affected parties, which are, his manager, client, other employees and himself.
In the first instance, he should try to sort out the issue with his manager, then also involve his trainer. Later on invite the client also. Higgin should explain to his manager that he has no enough experience and enough time to finish the work with standards that are satisfactory. Therefore he should suggest the use of a bookkeeper on a contract basis or contact the client to see if the deadline can be extended so that it is done when his colleague returns from leave. If the manager seems adamant, he should seek help from someone from the practice responsible for training.
If possible, he should accompany him so that the duos explain to the manager. If the two goes to the manager, it adds the advantage of involving the third party. It is unethical to try to complete the work while he knows he is incompetent. However refusing to do it will bring constraints for him and the practice.
Read More