In such cases emphasis and importance of ethics surpasses that of molarity. The argument supports Welsh idea that ethics is the treatment to people of whom there is no personal connection. Every decision made for this congregation of strangers means that someone will gain while another will lose. The degree of loss or gain in such instance is what counts and the leaders, therefore, have to bear these consequences in mind. To make a better husband or wife, daughter or son, dad or mum require molarity.
In this sense, molarity pertain to people you know personally, how you treat and relate to them. Good friends, workmates, and employees also gather their basis on molarity. For leaders and managers, molarity will enable them to be good leaders to those workers you know at personal level. Covey (1989, pp. 9-13) describes the types of situations that people get stuck while trying to ‘make things happen the way people expect them to’ and forget the uniqueness of each person and their character.
It is their push change their son that they realized they were the ones who needed to change. Due to their nature, ethics becomes more important than the molarity. The unknown population is greater than the ones with personal interaction and more diverse in all aspects. A decision not well thought may be fatal to a part of the population. Normative decision making does not only view the lawfulness or unlawfulness of an action, but also ethicality of the judgment in the right course of action to take.
The state laws where leadership is practiced determine its acceptability or unacceptability. An action may be lawful but unethical, or ethical but unlawful. With ethical considerations and reverence for the rule of law, managers need to make these decisions considering the effects of the outcome to the company and the society. A perception can fall in the like or dislike depending on the society setting and accepted behaviors. In a society, a negative perception in this case represents unethical behavior.
Sets of unethical behavior include; fraud, corruption, misconduct among other unethical behaviors. An action with good perception is regarded as ethical and morally acceptable in a society. Entry 1 Coveys (1989) gives real life examples of the do and do not in people. He tries to prove that only words and actions are not enough to correct the situation. Change in the perception played an important role in acquiring these habits. While researching about success, Covey found out that leading a successful, and effective life while pursuing happiness required one to integrate certain principals and habits in their basic characters.
A person’s character, habits, and physicality should not be compared to others. Their uniqueness should be the basis distinction and strength. He distinguishes inborn ‘primary’ and learned ‘secondary’ traits. He compares focus on learning a technique with cramming class content. Even when you pass and get good grades, while you never got good mastery of the content, then it will never turn into an educated mind. The seven primary habits possessed by highly effective people are either inborn or acquired and form the basis for success and enduring happiness.
According to Covey “sow a thought, leap an action; sow an action, leap a habit; sow a habit, leap a character; sow a character, leap a destiny (Covey 1989, p. 22).” Being proactive is the first habit Covey puts forward to being an effective person. Under this habit, inner freedom is defined and mans’ ability to control it. The effects of a circumstance to the human state can thus be internally defined and can be changed. The second habit is ‘begin with the end in mind’ (Covey 1989, p. 45). You should have a criterion of examining all the happenings to evaluate how they were planned and how they have actually become.
With things such as life and success, the preceding thing determines what follows and determining the end may be more vague than real.
Read More