The Value of Nature - Essay Example

According to Juniper (2013), he suggests that arguing that nature does not contain intrinsic value is like supporting the idea that without nature life will remain the same (pg. 2). It is therefore vital and unconfirmed reasoning at its worst. Mill describes nature as everything in the universe, he goes ahead and cautions us not to take nature as a guide in our daily life. Edwin Pister proved the existence of intrinsic value in nature by asking ‘what good are you?’ he compares the importance of humans and that of the pupfish. The ‘what good are you?’ question seeks to bring forth the human being intrinsic value into consideration. Pister dubbed the evidence as Phenomenological Proof. In addition, The Teleological Proof presented by Val Routley and Richard stated that everything has its sole purpose. They attest to these proofs by giving the importance of wrench, wheelbarrow, spade, and many others to having great importance to humans (Vilkka, 1997, pg.21).

In conclusion, complete reliance on science for our understanding of nature makes us empty, and the value of nature should be highly appreciated. Nature is indeed valuable in itself, hence it is not detachable to the existence of humans.