Free

Environmentalists cannot be animal liberationists - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Many people think that the environmental activists and animal rights activists are same. They perceive that both environmental activists and the animal rights activists are involved in similar social and environmental welfare activities to achieve a single goal. In short, it can be said that their purpose of work is same. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.9% of users find it useful
Environmentalists cannot be animal liberationists
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Environmentalists cannot be animal liberationists"

Paper Introduction Many people think that the environmental activists and animal rights activists are same. They perceive that both environmental activists and the animal rights activists are involved in similar social and environmental welfare activities to achieve a single goal. In short, it can be said that their purpose of work is same. Here, it needs to be mentioned that above assumption of common people is true to a certain extent as both the environmental activists and the animal rights activists act to maintain the ecological balance of the planet to ensure environment friendly world with a proper ecosystem. However, here it needs to be mentioned that there have been certain different arguments that seems to differentiate between the environmental activists with the animal rights activists.
Environmentalists cannot be animal liberationists. Animal liberationists cannot be environmentalists
Although various people believe that both animal rights activists and the environmental activists belong to the same class. Author Gary Varner actually spoke with Mark Sagoff mentioning the belief that the animal rights activists cannot be environmental activists. As a matter of fact this is a statement that has been made by various authors. According to the authors, it is very hard to mess these two groups into a larger group. Varner also stated that among the environmental philosophers there is a tendency to compare the environmental ethics and the animal rights. This is usually done by differentiating the specific views in the ethical theories or the specific accounts of the views that might imply to discussion (Varner 98). The environmental philosophers on the other hand cannot come into an agreement over the fact that the theoretical foundations as well as the practical applications of the animal rights view are quite inconsistent with the people belonging to the discipline of the environmentalism. Varner also provided evidence that the two groups look at themselves as two different groups, hence the people around should also look to do the same. Varner also said that Bryan Norton believed that both the groups of animal rights activists and the environmental activists should help each other because both the values and systems of the groups point towards the common objective of protecting the ecological balance. The topic became interesting after going through an article regarding billboards that PETA had positioned in Canada. The billboard actually said ‘Eat the Whales’. This was actually targeted towards the environmentalists that were protesting against the hunting of whales. According to Sagoff, animals have rights in not suffering just like the humans. According the animal rights activists the nature undermines the rights of the animals by killing the animal in far larger numbers than human beings do. The nature visits the animals with suffering that exceeds the sufferings of the animals in the hands of the humans. Therefore, to protect the rights and interests of the animals the animal activists should be committed to get the animals out of the wild.
In simple terms Sagoff wanted to differentiate between the animal rights activists and the environmentalists. According to Sagoff the animal rights activists look to maintain animal equality and animal rights. The moral standing of the activists is only for the higher animals. There is presence of individualism and anti hunting. On the other hand the environmental activists actually believe in the ecological integrity. The ecological or environmental ethics stands for the respect for the overall functioning of the natural systems. The moral standings of the environmental activists focus on the animals, plants, ecosystems and the Earth itself. Another major difference between the animal activists and the environmental activists is the fact, that the animal activists actually feel that, predation is not a good thing for the animal rights. Whereas the environmental activists feel that predation is god as it helps in maintaining the ecological balance and it is needed to protect the predators and if needed reintroduce them.
Conclusion
From the detailed discussion above, it can be concluded that the animal rights activists actually believe that the activists are morally compelled to prevent predation. But such proposals actually are anti environmentalist. This sacrifices integrity, authenticity and the wildness of the whole ecosystem. Hence, it can be said that the environmental activists cannot consistently be known as the environmentalists, Add to this the policy of recommendations that follow from the theories of the animal activists are quite strange and tends to contradict with that of the bigger picture itself, i.e. the ecological balance.
Work Cited
Varner, Gary. In Natures Interests? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Environmentalists cannot be animal liberationists Essay”, n.d.)
Environmentalists cannot be animal liberationists Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1622451-environmentalists-cannot-be-animal-liberationists
(Environmentalists Cannot Be Animal Liberationists Essay)
Environmentalists Cannot Be Animal Liberationists Essay. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1622451-environmentalists-cannot-be-animal-liberationists.
“Environmentalists Cannot Be Animal Liberationists Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1622451-environmentalists-cannot-be-animal-liberationists.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Environmentalists cannot be animal liberationists

Animal paper

...? Section/# The Whale The Animal The whale is the largest variety of mammal that is extent on this planet. As such,its sheer size coupled with the environment with which it lives provides the animal a unique relationship with the environment and the habitat with which it lives. As one might expect, due to the sheer size of the animal, it is usually not particularly fast or agile. During the course of a normal day the animal will rise from out of the depths of the sea, seek out the surface, expunge the air it has held in its lung and inhale for another descent into the depths. Oftentimes this methodical rise and descent is accented by one or two acrobatic flips into the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Animal Experimentation

..., animal testing gives hope to parents of such babies by giving them an opportunity to increase their child’s chances of survival. These tests on animals show the influence of corticosteroids on the young and weak, breathing system of animals involved, lamb, and sheep, by speeding up the rate of development. In children, it has thus, saved lives by developing surfactants for babies that cannot develop on their own. Studies due to the same experiments have even improved the chances of survival for children born to mothers who received doses of corticosteroids, as opposed to those that did not. It is for this reason that animal testing should be done,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Animal Rights

...?It is hard to believe the sheer number of technological advances as the human race has made within the past few decades. However, like any type of advancement, the price of this technological advancement has been an explosion of comfort and consumption oriented industries; not the least of which is that of “fast food”. The evolution of fast food has effectively brought the carnage and industrial slaughter of animals to a scale that has never before been seen in the course of human history. In addition to mechanizing and industrializing animal slaughter, the advent of fast food has also removed animals from their native environment and placed them into sterile perennially lit confines that force them to eat an unnatural diet... of that is...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Animal Farm

...Macro & Micro economics, Term Paper Topic: Animal Farm Introduction: George Orwell created this satire “Animal Farm: A Fairy Story,” to highlight the drawbacks of political systems and the suffering of the common citizens. A group of animals decide to seek emancipation from human tyranny, oust the humans from the farm (power). The promised equality for all the animals is not forthcoming and eventually some ‘more equal’ animals perfect a system of tyranny of their own. The novella is a stinging critique of the Russian Revolution. It allegorizes the rise to power of the dictator Joseph Stalin. In this story, the human oppressor Mr. Jones is overthrown by a...
3 Pages(750 words)Term Paper

Animal Rights

...huge benefits and advantages from these non-human animals. The non-human animals have important contribution in agricultural and industrial sectors. Therefore, animals have the right to die or get injured if they harm the human beings. Similarly, it is the right of the innocent non-human animals to live without fear in the society. Human beings should not hurt or kill the non-human animals considering the law of humanity. This law of humanity does not allow the human beings to torture or kill a non human animal. The human beings are mentally strong than these non-human animals. Human beings are known as social...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Animal

...continued to make assault on different parts of Europe in 1369, 1374-5, 1379, 1390, 1407 until 1722. In London, its attack has been noticed in 1665. Still, it is a puzzling question that why it did not attack after that as deadly as it did during medieval period. It is believed that general hygiene in Europe improved significantly but that cannot be a true reason entirely (Man and Disease: The Black Death). Byrne argues “At the time of the Black Death, medical science was essentially where it had been a millennium and a half earlier" (13). Also, the normal burial and funeral practices were affected significantly due to large number of deaths and fear of infection forced people to resort to minimal rituals. Although...
5 Pages(1250 words)Book Report/Review

Money cannot buy happiness

...as money can’t really buy happiness. It is written in many spiritual texts that money can only buy the source but not true content of happiness. For example, money can buy a house but not a home filled with love and affection; it can buy a bed but not sleep; it can buy companions but not friends. Money is required for satisfaction of material wants, and there is no end to human wants. In the race of achieving more and more material needs, man tends to forget to be happy. Man is a social animal and cannot live in isolation. Rich men attract people, but hardly have any friends; or, tend to lose friends in due course because their focus is towards making more money rather than to give time to their...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Animal Rights versus Animal Welfare

...Animal Rights versus Animal Welfare Animals are part of the environment and should be protected from the changes that human activities have caused on the environment. Animal protection can be done through animal rights and animal welfare. Animal rights refer to the concept of considering the interest of animals at the same level of concern as considering human interests. Animal welfare ensures that the physical and psychological health of the animals is observed. The terms used in animal protection show human concern over the nature....
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper

Animal

...Fictional Animal In the year 2146, the world will have faced diverse climatic change. This change, is believed to be caused mostly by increased human activities and industrialization, has affected not only the vegetation, human beings but also animals. This includes domestic, wild animals, both land and aquatic animals. In my case, I will discuss on Cycopus Bear (Kingsolver, 56). This is a fiction animal that temperate climatic conditions especially along the equatorial regions. This mammal has being biologically created by United Nations random animal generator machine. The Cycopus Bear is a hairy mammal, in the family of Ursidae. Its...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

The Militant Environmentalists War on Environmental Crisis

... The Militant Environmentalists’ War on Environmental Crisis It is obvious that the environmental friendliness in all the spheres of human activity, primarily industry and transport, should be the first priority for us to save our home, our planet. This has become a result of a serious pollution of the environment, the air and water, by the waste products of numerous plants the number of which grows steadily, and, consequently, a significant damage, mostly unredeemable, of the living space of many species. One of the first mentioning of the problem of air pollution in Europe is dated by the XIII century when “…England’s King Edward I threatened Londoners with harsh penalties if they didn’t stop burning sea-coal.” (History, 2009... Mason is...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Environmentalists cannot be animal liberationists for FREE!

Contact Us