Nobody downloaded yet

Levels of Analysis, Realism, and Liberalism - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
According to D’Anieri, there are three key levels of analysis in explaining or interpreting certain event or phenomenon in the field of the international politics: individual, state, and system (18)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93% of users find it useful
Levels of Analysis, Realism, and Liberalism
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Levels of Analysis, Realism, and Liberalism"

Download file to see previous pages In the individual level, it is posited that a particular war -- which is a form of an international phenomenon -- is caused mainly by an individual, generally or specifically. Further, the factor at the individual level is substantially an immediate one (Cashman and Robinson 4). It is widely believed that the immediate cause of the 2003 Iraq War was primarily in the individual level. More specifically, U.S. President George W. Bush was the mastermind on why America went to war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. His personality or belief system was an important factor in realizing the war. If Al Gore had been the U.S. president, Levy and Thompson assert that America would probably have not invaded Iraq in the post-9/11 era (212). In the state level of analysis, war -- such as the Iraq War -- is significantly caused by the nature or form of the state, government, or political party. Hallenberg and Karlsson contend that the 2003 Iraq War had materialized due essentially to the Republican Party’s neo-conservative stance (233). Also known as neo-imperialism, the Republican Party believes in the so-called “manifest destiny” in which America is tasked to free the “savage” countries from fascism, terrorism and others. It must be noted that Iraq, in the pre-Iraq War, was dominated by a dictatorial leader. To free the Iraqi people from bondage and oppression, America via the Republican Party went to war against terrorism. ...
Particularly using the realist paradigm, scholars and people are able to view this war phenomenon in a more objective fashion. Perhaps it is true that the individual level is somewhat compelling in saying that it is immediate cause of the Iraq War; nevertheless, the whole picture elucidates that there are bigger forces or factors that greatly shaped the realization of war: power politics. In the pre-Iraq War period, the U.S. arguably felt threatened, real or imagine, with Iraq’s rising military power under Saddam Hussein. Based from the realist framework, the logical action for the superpower U.S. to do was to invade Iraq in order to secure America’s survival. The system level provides a much bigger picture in analyzing why America went to war. Compare and Contrast: Realism and Liberalism D’Anieri differentiates the two popular paradigms prominent in the field of international politics: between realism and liberalism. These two theories or praxes differ markedly on how they generally view the world politics. On the one hand, realism sees the international political arena in a more pessimistic way (D’Anieri 60). As its fundamental precept, the praxis of realism stipulates that states or nation-states greatly vie for power. D’Anieri notes that realism highly considers the theories of hegemonic stability and balance of power. Their similarities basically define the concept of realism: (1) anarchy is the major condition that constrains state action and/or policy, (2) rational/unitary states are the fundamental actors in the international political scene, (3) distribution of power defines and confines the system, among other things ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Levels of Analysis, Realism, and Liberalism Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de
(Levels of Analysis, Realism, and Liberalism Essay)
“Levels of Analysis, Realism, and Liberalism Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Levels of Analysis, Realism, and Liberalism

International Relations: Realism and Liberalism

...of this paper will be to identify what each theory seeks to achieve and more importantly how it does so. Linked to this fundamental argument will be the concept of interdependence of states followed by a simultaneous country analysis. Following this theoretical framework will be an analysis of the question that will be addressed at three levels: First, the need the Liberalists put forward to employ Liberalist ideologies in International Relations; Second, the right that will justify Liberalism as being better and more practical than Realism; and third, the major criticisms that they hurl at Realists and the problems associated with...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Realism, Liberalism, and the English School

...Realism, Liberalism, and the English School I. Introduction International foreign policy is historically viewed as being based on two competing theories of application. The school of Realism views the State as a unified actor created through the centralization of power and monopoly of legitimate use of force that it possesses within its sovereign territories, including economic, military, social, and ideological factors in application. The school of Realism can be dated primarily to the Italian philosopher Machiavelli, who counseled for a ruthless use of power to secure the goals and aims of a sovereign or politician. The Realist school makes it clear that States are...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Realism, Liberalism and Marxism

...from regionalism or religious bonds. Short term objectives and short term policy making is never encouraged in liberalism because it always advocates the importance of adopting a broader perspective of things with a deeper understanding which in most of the cases is not possible without an extensive analysis. Absolute gains are preferred over relative gains and the liberals are always supposed to have a clear objective in their mind while going about the affairs of the state (Linklater, 2000). By defining a role of international organizations in the global politics, liberalism comes in direct conflict with realism because liberalism...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

How Does Realism/Neo-realism and Liberalism/Neo-liberalism Theories Constitute and Explain the Reasons for the Afghanistan War

...development. Neo liberalism theory is the response of neo realism that focuses on states and development. In both these theories, states and benefits have been the central mode of discussion. Neo liberalism theory also states that even in anarchy state, firms and organsiations can attain mutual gains and development through a systematic approach. There is very little doubt over the similarity between neo realism and neo liberalism theories as both these theories focus on state related benefits as the central idea of discussion and analysis. The neo liberals believe that interstate cooperation will lead to the creation of...
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay

Liberalism and Realism - International Relations

... heights. To conclude, Realist believe that human beings are essentially ego centric and self-centred and there can nev er be any cooperation between them on an independent level, while liberalist believe that there is a scope and potential for human beings to co-exist within the ambit and outside the ambit of nation state and allow for cooperation between each other on an international level with regards to sharing of ideas and other important aspects of developments. Work Cited "Realism - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary." Dictionary and Thesaurus - Merriam-Webster Online. Web. 08 Nov. 2011. realism>. "Liberalism vs Realism." POLiS. Web. 08 Nov. 2011. liberalism-vs-realism.html>.... 8 November Liberalism vs...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

3 levels of analysis

...or arson or if the killing certainly involved torture (Simon 2009). Other factors include, killing of officers enforcing law while performing duties, poisoning of the victim, explosive materials were involved in the killing and killing of witnesses or judges to stop their duties amongst others. The death penalty is retained by most states for defendants convicted of the highest level of murder offense. States vary in how often death penalty is opted by the prosecution. Life imprisonment without parole possibility is imposed in states where death penalties are not imposed. Convictions of first-degree murder that have no aggravating factors have a range of sentences in prison like life imprisonment but with eventual parole...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Liberalism and Realism

...Liberalism and Realism A paradigmatic approach to international relations refers to the view of the world. The worldview includes agreement such as on what the basic needs are and an explanation to the core problems. It also seeks the appropriate theory to give an explanation. Although other scientists argue paradigms in definite terms, political scientists feel that everyone has a different view about the international system as much as it concerns the physical world (Shimko 331-332). All paradigms try to achieve all but the same thing. The paradigms are in efforts to provide a straightforward map of reality. They take all the complexities of the real world and reduce them to a central set of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Realism and liberalism

...Realism and liberalism Realism is a perspective whose domination is mostly by cynics, perhaps exemplified best in the tenants of pragmatism and morality. Realists place states in a position of having to observe the action of neighbors closely to effectively trying to resolve problems without regard to the moral concerns. Realists believe that the creep of morality into the international relations handicaps in a way that they fail to cope with the new conditions. Realisms, believing it does in the political laws must also believe in the possibility of creating rational theory that helps in reflecting objective laws. They also believe in the possibility of distinguishing...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Classical Realism, Neo Liberalism and Constructivism

.... The constructivist continue to reevaluate the position that social norms and rules hold in establishing the significance of liberal democratic establishments. Consequently, the constructivists continue to emphasize the social dimensions of international relations. Constructivists demonstrate the importance of norms, rules, and language at this level for identity (Dunne, Milja and Steve 189). For instance, the factors defining the identity of communist Yugoslavia were notably different from those formulating the conflicts in Serbia, Croatia and the Muslim ethnicities and norms (Dunne, Milja and Steve 197). This theory is successful in combining the analysis of how materialism and...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Democracy Promotion for Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism

...Democracy Promotion for Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism, and Obama One of the main components of U.S. foreign policy is democracy promotion. Democracy promotion matters to realism, liberalism, and constructivism, depending on how they see U.S.-led democracy promotion’s impacts on the international political system. These theoretical approaches also vary in how they understand the difference between projection of value and projection of power. Projecting value refers to projecting the values of democracy (i.e. equal human rights and freedoms), while projection of American power refers to using democracy to enforce American values on other states for the main purpose of...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Levels of Analysis, Realism, and Liberalism for FREE!

Contact Us