The film: Twelve Angry Men - Essay Example

In the end, the jurors decide that there is a reasonable doubt: a doubt that begins with the questioning of one of the jurors. Juror number eight is the source of this doubt that causes the initial conflict and eventually takes over the entire group of twelve men. Overall, the film is interesting because it has much to say about leadership in groups, how the jury system is sometimes ineffective, and how difficult it is for individuals to remain objective. The protagonist and antagonist of the film, juror number eight and juror number three respectively, represent the two opposing camps as informal leaders.

Ultimately, the protagonist wins by means of convincing the other jurors that his position is the correct one. He does this through eliciting involvement. Rather than framing the situation in terms of an argument, as number three does by raising his voice and insulting others, number eight describes a discussion. He says, “I just want to talk.” As such, he provides a supportive climate, much more so than his opponents do. This supportive climate is important because it helps him win over others more easily than his opponents.

By rationally incorporating others into the discussion, juror number eight demonstrates his respect for them, which is necessary in any group where a consensus is crucial. Juror number eight is able to