Download file to see previous pages...
Leadership can be effectively defined simply as influence (Maxwell 1993). A person in a certain position may have a good idea, yet if he doesn’t have the skill to influence others to believe those ideas he has, he cannot be called a leader. In the case of the jury, every juror has to have its own conviction regarding the case to be tried. It is the trait of an effective leader that is needed to be able to come up with a credible decision among the jury. Jury is referred to as a group of randomly-selected citizens who have been invited for the hearing of a case in their own area. Their function is to study the case and make a decision with regards to the evidences gathered, guided by the rules of the law (Legal Explanation 2007). In the critically acclaimed 1957 movie, Twelve Angry Men, the life of the accused, an 18-year-old male who allegedly stabbed his father, greatly relies upon the decision of the jury. The movie implies that if Juror number 8 hadn’t shown leadership skill, the boy will most likely be sentenced to death in just one trial. Poor juristical performance is seen among the rest of eleven jurors as they just decided with their prejudices and the desire to leave the court’s humid atmosphere brought by the summer season....
The Jury approached the case with the Socratic Method combined with "influence" principle displayed by Juror number 8. Socrates is said to famously instruct his students through a series of carefully constructed questions designed to force self-examination and lead them to a conclusion. This resulted both in the teacher and student being better able to order their thoughts and arguments into a stronger, more coherent theory toughened by relentless hammering in the workings of debate (Tucker 2007). Through the Socratic Method, Juror number 8 indirectly challenged the rest of eleven jurors who were eager to have the case be decided promptly, but eventually resulted in having them reconsider it. This was influenced by Juror number 8's consideration of reasonable doubt.
The jury is also a team. This is justifiably depicted in the movie. The team inevitably deals with factors like task, maintenance, and self-centered roles (Lechner 2003). For example, the task of the team in the film is to come up with the proper decision if the accused is to be acquitted or to be sentenced to death. The vote of eleven jurors of guilty and a juror of not guilty, was interrupted but due to acceptable reason. Changes set in when a leader wanted to achieve the justifiable task given to them. It is expected that in a team, there is always a challenge for team work if it is to consider the individual behavior of the team players.
Self-centered roles can be seen by the character of Juror number 3, played by Lee J. Cobb. His quick-to-convict and defiant nature made him difficult to go with the team decision, and it is the challenge that the team had to overcome. Through encouragement and the influence approach of the Juror number 8 along with the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
12 Angry Men: The Role of Ethics The movie, 12 Angry Men , follows the murder trial of a teenaged Hispanic boy who is being tried for the murder of his father and focuses on the juries deliberation of the case. The boy has little in the way of an alibi, and all circumstantial evidence agrees with him being the killer.
12 Angry Men A Review The film 12 Angry Men (1957) observes and reports on the jury system of the United States. The 18 year-old Spanish defendant draws five older gentlemen and seven middle aged men as his jury of peers. One juror is foreign born and one is from poverty.
570323 12 Angry Men Order At the beginning of the movie, Twelve Angry Men, a juror of twelve men are assembled to decide the death penalty case of a young Latino man who is being prosecuted for killing his father. The story is not really about the defendant though.
They are uneasily brought together to deliberate after the trial and hearing of 'facts' in an apparently open-and-shut murder trial case. They withdraw to a jury room to perform their civic duty to provide a just verdict for the indigent 19-year-old minority defendant with a criminal record and whose fate is uncertain.
When one thinks of the greatest translations of a book to film, two very often spring immediately to mind. It is not surprising, therefore, that in his glowing review of this film the renowned critic Vincent Canby referred to both when called All the President's Men "an unequivocal smash-hit-the thinking man's Jaws" (1976).
“Twelve Angry Men” is a film that falls under the genre of American drama film and was released in the year 1957. The film is also remarkable for the continuity and exclusive use of a single set. Also the film will leave a long lasting impression on the minds of its audience because of its outstanding opening scene.
Within this context, the film Of Mice and Men, released in the year 1939, is noteworthy because the director Lewis Milestone deals with the theme of human relationships and tragedy from a different angle of view. Thesis statement: In the film Of Mice and Men, the
The same is the case in the film as the twelve jurors make their decision by systematically changing their belief on the guilt of the defender. Eleven of them decide that the boy is guilty without considering any of the evident effectively. They do so owing to the
5 Pages(1250 words)Movie Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Movie Review on topic Twelve Angry Men: Factors in Decision for FREE!