Nobody downloaded yet

Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name Institution Course Date Twelve Angry Men Analyses Synopsis of the movie Twelve Angry Men (1957), is an iconic film originally written as a play by Reginald rose and adapted as a TV drama in 1957. Sidney Lumet directed the movie in 1957. This is a fascinating, piercing, and enthralling examination of a varied group of twelve male jurors who are generally middle-aged, white, and mostly from a middle-class background…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.7% of users find it useful
Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper"

Download file to see previous pages At the start of their deliberations, all the jurors pass a guilty verdict against the defendant except one juror. This forces the juror to examine the evidence and after tireless arguments, they emerge with a not guilty verdict. Analysis Due process is one of the major principles of American jurisprudence, which is enshrined in the fifth amendment of the constitution. Due process requires that no person be detained to respond for a capital, or an infamous offense, except on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury. Before a person is convicted on a criminal offence, due process requires that the Jury come to a unanimous decision. Lack of a unanimous guilty verdict in the first vote in Twelve Angry men, ensures that the jury re-examines the evidence until not all of them vote guilty as their verdict. This is to ensure that the correct verdict has been reached which is a sign of agreement by all the jurors, solidarity, and unity and to prove that the decision lacks any doubt. A unanimous decision will also ensure that the accused does not face another trial (Siegel, Schmalleger and Worrall 39). Due process also requires that the prosecution prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to ensure that the jury returns a conviction of guilty. In case the Prosecution fails to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, then the defendant will always be acquitted. Proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt also ensures that the prosecution has given enough evidence to show that evidence establishes a particular point to a moral certainty and that it is beyond dispute that any reasonable alternative is possible (Siegel, Schmalleger and Worrall 44). The prosecution could not prove their case beyond reasonable doubt in Twelve Angry Men hence the jury’s decision to come back with a not guilty verdict. Due process of law requires a presumption of innocence by the government on a criminal in case of lack of any contrary evidence. Presumption of innocence is applied in due process to ensure that the government proves the case of the defendant beyond reasonable doubt. The defendant in this case is presumed innocent before the hearing and when due process takes effect, he is found not guilty because the prosecution’s case could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt. A defendant in any criminal case has a right to a jury of his peers. This ensures that the defendant gets a fair verdict, which will be morally held and cannot be contested (Siegel, Schmalleger and Worrall 56). One of the jurors who voted the defendant guilty at first is juror 3. He has preconceived notions about the case and quite antagonistic to juror 8 who votes not guilty. He is a temperamental man who loses his temper whenever anyone opposes his ideas. He has a bad relationship with his son and this makes him to judge the defendant guilty for his crime due to his problems at home. He argues that based on the evidence provided, the case was simple and straightforward thus his conviction that the defendant is guilty. He however changes his mind and is the last person to vote not guilty after coming to terms with his problem. Juror 10, Ed Begley is one of the jurors who show prejudice in terms of his judgment. He votes guilty at the start because he believes that the defendant comes from the ghetto and people from the ghetto kill ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper

Twelve Angry Men: Negotiation Techniques Employed

...? Twelve Angry Men: Negotiation Techniques Employed Twelve Angry Men: Negotiation Techniques Employed Character Listing Juror is played by Martin Balsam. He is the foreman of the jury, and is extremely even-tempered and willing to listen to the evidence. He is also very polite. Juror #2 is played by John Fiedler. The best description for this man is nebbish. He seems very bookish and is very meek. Juror #3 is played by Lee Cobb. He is arguably the second most important character, behind Juror #8. He is hot-tempered and loud, and his temper is also extremely quick. He is very angry. He is, more than any of the jurors,...
13 Pages(3250 words)Term Paper

The film: Twelve Angry Men

...?The film Twelve Angry Men is an entertaining illustration why choices and individuals matter. In an environment in which every person needs to reachthe same conclusion, people need to work together to sort through and decide on evidence that is very limited at times. In the process of this anonymous situation, individuals must put aside their differences, backgrounds, and biases in order to see things objectively and with clarity. Some of the jurors in the film cannot complete this requirement and shut themselves down trying; others in the jury room are capable of viewing the case objectively and reach a consensus through remaining rational. In the end, the jurors decide that there is a reasonable doubt: a doubt that begins... prejudices....
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Twelve Angry Men

...?570323 12 Angry Men Order At the beginning of the movie, Twelve Angry Men, a juror of twelve men are assembled to decide the death penalty case of ayoung Latino man who is being prosecuted for killing his father. The story is not really about the defendant though. It is about the group dynamics of the jury and how they change throughout the movie. To start with, the group comes from a wide range of backgrounds and beliefs, but what is more important is how they view the purpose of their task. Most want to just “get it over with” regardless of the outcome. Because it does not affect their lives in any significant way,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

12 angry men film analysis

...12 Angry Men Order ID – 853036 Introduction The movie “12 Angry Men” (1957) by Brian Rathjen, deals with a case of capital murder involving a youth of Spanish- American dissent. The chief premise of this movie is to prove his guilt or innocence in front of a deliberating jury. This mini drama comprises of the prejudices and misconceptions of the jury in trying to arrive at the proper solution in the trial of first degree murder. The accused is a Hispanic - Latino, 18 years of age and the crime is the killing of his father by stabbing. 1. Leadership: Describe the different approaches to leadership represented on the jury. What theory or theories best explain(s) the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Twelve Angry Men: Factors in Decision

...Twelve Angry Men: Factors in Decision Skills in leadership are applicable to many aspects. In a certain group, it is natural for one to stand out asa leader, but not necessarily to lead. Many people are mistaken by defining leadership as only a position and not seeing the importance that the result effective leadership could create. Leadership can be effectively defined simply as influence (Maxwell 1993). A person in a certain position may have a good idea, yet if he doesn't have the skill to influence others to believe those ideas he has, he cannot be called a leader. In the case of the jury, every juror has to have its own conviction regarding the case to be tried. It is the trait of an...
4 Pages(1000 words)Movie Review

12 angry men movie

... 16 Feb. 2008 12 Angry Men The film “12 Angry Men” is a critically acclaimed film directed by first time director Sidney Lumet and released in the year 1957. The film is about the court trial of an 18 year old Spanish-American boy who is accused of murdering his father. A jury consisting of 12 men is assigned the job of looking into the case. It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three minutes in the washroom. The movie for nominated for three Oscars(Best Director, Best Picture and Best Writing, screenplay based on material from another medium... ) and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Twelve Angry Men

...Twelve Angry Men Introduction “Twelve Angry Men” is a film that falls under the genre of American drama film and was released in the year 1957. A teleplay bearing the same title was adapted which casted Reginald Rose. The film “Twelve Angry Men” was directed by Sidney Lumet. The film encapsulates a story that revolves round a jury comprised of twelve men who render the judgement to the person who is guilty and acquitted of a defendant based on some reasonable grounds. The film is also remarkable for the continuity and exclusive use of a single set. Also...
2 Pages(500 words)Movie Review

12 angry men

...12 Angry Men The movie “12 Angry Men” is an archetypal courtroom movie featuring twelve jurors and a defendant, accused of murder. The movie depicts the jury as the core and integral part of the criminal justice system. In the movie, one of the jurors is of a dissenting opinion and passionately attempt to free the accused. He does this by successfully convincing the other 11 members of the jury to buy his idea of “burden of proof” concerning the evidence presented against the accused. The defendant is accused of having murdered his vicious father. When the case reaches the jury, the majority of the 12-member jury has no doubt that the accused committed...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry Men

...Group process in the film “12 angry men” The jury deliberation in the film, “12 angry men” is a portrayal of group dynamics. Group dynamics relates to the functioning, structure and the roles individuals play in a group. The jury in the film, consisting of twelve men, was drawn together to determine whether the boy was culpable of killing his father. The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of humanity, from the coldly analytical juror number four to the bigotry...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men

...Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men Affiliation: Introduction Evidence decision-making processes and organizational behavior is observed in the movie 12 Angry Men (1957). A recap on the film shows 12 men deciding the fate of an 18-year-old man accused of killing his father. These men, jurors, give their opinions and vote (guilty or not guilty) based on rational and irrational reasons. As observed within the movie, a variety of evidence-based analysis of the case lead to their decision as observed through the use of verbal and non-verbal communication cues. Movie Analysis Conflicts According to the movie, Juror # 10 is convinced that people from slum backgrounds "are liars and are wild and dangerous" (Lumet,1957). This portrays... the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper for FREE!

Contact Us