StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Dismantling Race, Class, and Gender - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper 'Dismantling Race, Class, and Gender' tells us that it is often a case in which the circumstances that surround their birth, who they were born as, the colour of their skin, the child of whom they are, and the general prevalent situation of the clime in which they were born…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Dismantling Race, Class, and Gender
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Dismantling Race, Class, and Gender"

?Dismantling Race, and Gender It is undeniable that in life some people are well positioned than others. Most times, it is not as if they did anything special to deserve what they are, who they are or what they possess. It is often a case in which the circumstances that surround their birth, who they were born as, the colour of their skin, the child of whom they are and the general prevalent situation of the clime in which they were born (Barker 436). Some of the privileges enjoyed include being white, male or/and wealthy. By and large in the many societies, these sets of people are easily favoured because of the circumstances surrounding their birth. In Dismantling Privilege—An Ethics of Accountability, what Hobgood the author simply does is to reveal how certain group of people in the society are made to undergo suffer because of some of the features they possess or because of the circumstances surrounding their birth. What Hobgood eventually reveals is that some of the victimised and some of those that dish out victimisation may not recognise that they are involved in it. Class, race and gender systems construct different identities through unjust power arrangements. These systems are patterns of relations that elites reproduce through their ownership and/or control of the major institutions in the society (Hobgood 1). Every race seems to be wired to think of itself as superior to others. Many people even believe that if a person comes from any other race apart from theirs, such a person does not deserve to get any attention from them. This superiority complex has been attributed as the reason colonialism thrived in the manner it did. Colonialism succeeded because the whites – the colonisers – were of the opinion that their race was superior to every other race in the world. They went around to parts of the world that were yet to be explored with the intention of being lord and master over those people. In many of the places they went, the culture of the locals was rubbished. The colonisers were often involved in the act of saying that they discovered things the locals had been using for a very long time, even before the birth of the colonisers themselves. It was so bad that the coloniser had to share the colonies amongst themselves without consulting the people whose daily lives were affected by the sharing. This is only a tip of the iceberg of what the segregation as a result of race has caused. Obviously, as in her book, the opinion of Hobgood is the same with this. So, in this regard, what she succeeds in doing is to deepen many of my long-held opinions. It is important to mention that at many points in history, race, class and gender have adversely affected the growth and development of humanity. There have been periods in human history when women were not recognised in anything. During this period, they were completely inconsequential (Purvis 40). During that period, it was really a man’s world in which a woman was only supposed to be who the man says she is. Religious institutions did not even help the plight of women (Blevins 21). Women got little or no education. They could not even vote or be voted for at some point. It is very certain that during that period of time, many women who had potentials for greatness were denied a chance to bring their endowments to reality. Of course, as repercussion, not only those women will suffer from it, even the society would suffer from the consequences. This also is very much in line what Hobgood expresses. Assumptions about human behaviour that members of market societies believe to be universal, that humans are naturally competitive and acquisitive, and that social stratification is natural... (Gowdy 291) In many societies of the world, there is social stratification. In such societies, certain unseen borders are automatically created when people are divided into classes based on their social means or capability. In such societies, the wealthy is the master and the poor is the servant (Barnard 379). The wealthy are the elite of the society while the poor are the illiterates. The poor are in perpetual servitude to the rich. This kind of environments is often rife with rebellion and recalcitrance which is often displayed by the downtrodden (the poor). The irony of it all is that this situation is often viewed from two opposing points of view by those concerned. While the benefitting upper class wants the status quo to be maintained, the suffering lower class is all out in pursuit of change. There is also the idea of one class being a social burden on another class. The truth is that all social classes are burdens on one another, one way or the other. But it is often the case that each class says only that which suites members of its class (Gidden et al 206). For instance, in a capitalist society (which is a society that greatly engenders the emphasis of differences), it may be argued that as much as the lower class is a burden on the upper and middle class, the middle and upper classes are also burdensome in some ways on the middle class. But, depending on one’s view point, one class is more burdensome than the other. If an arguer is socialist-inclined, the capitalist is more burdensome. If the arguer is more capitalist-inclined, the labourer is more burdensome. Here a clarification from my personal socialist point of view. The capitalist is a business entrepreneur whose primary goal is not the wellbeing of his workers, all the capitalist is concerned about how profit can be optimised (even at all cost). Shifting over a bit to the capitalist side of the coin, the capitalist is of the opinion that he has every right to get whatever he wants to get from his worker because he has done his share by paying the workers their salaries. This is where Hobgood’s postulation of the demolition of class, race and gender barriers comes in. What Hobgood proposed will largely bridge the gap between the poor and the rich. Hence, there may no longer be need to wonder which social class is more burdensome. The implication of breaking the barrier of class is that there will no longer be classes. All human will be equal. It is said in George Orwell’s Animal Farm that all animals are equal but some are more equal (Orwell 11). In this case, all animals will be equal and there will no longer be “more equals.” Hobgood’s postulation has soft spots for socialism because no genuine capitalist will ever think along Hobgood ‘s line of thought. Like every other obstacle to proper human relations, the impediments posed by social class need to be totally removed. This is exactly what Hobgood advocates. Her opinion does not in any way counter what I have always believed. On the contrary, it has reiterated by position. One must state that it may be inconvenient for those concerned to effect a change. For the bourgeois, this change does not come on a platter of gold. Most times, as a result of the fact that they have power, they often use everything within their means to stand on the way of change. On the other hand also, change for the proletariat is never easy. Most times, many of them usually often wait to be pushed to the limits of the wall before they move to act to change their fate. At times, those persons that benefit from inequality do not even know that they benefit from it. (Or should one say that they would rather live in denial). For instance, in a society where there is a dichotomy between whites and blacks, some whites are just ripping the result of the activities of their forebears. As James Baldwin says White people are trapped in a history they do not understand ( Ayers 42). Similarly, most men have never experienced what it is like to be a woman neither do many rich people know what it is to be poor. However, this does not mean they should not work towards having a state in which equality is paramount. This is in line with what Hobgood advocates. Besides, it must be clearly mentioned that all human beings, at their worst or at their best, are the same. One should not forget in a hurry the fact that all human races, gender, colour or class have elements of the abnormal in them. In a situation in which there is not equality of status, a situation in which the boundaries of colour, race, gender and class are supreme, the group that sees itself as superior would deemphasise or even deny its own abnormality while emphasising the abnormality of other. In accordance with Hobgood’s stand, when all groups of persons are seen as equals, all elements of abnormalities will become inconsequential. It is important to mention that in as much that everyone is entitled to their opinion, one might have course to disagree with the opinion of some people. Even though my personal opinion is largely in tandem with that of Hobgood, the point where she says that some of the perpetuators of an oppressive act do not know it seems to be too big to swallow. It must be mentioned that even human beings who claim that they are dead to their conscience still have their supposedly dead conscience calling back at them. The point being made here is that it is impossible for anyone to say they are totally unaware of the fact that they are from an oppressive system. Against all forms of inequality, according to Mary Elizabeth Hobgood, there is one solution—a politics of solidarity. This is very much in line with what Marxist philosophers stand for. When all those that are wronged realise that they have a common enemy and they cannot defeat this common enemy by challenging him or her personally. They can only attain victory in their fight by coming to together (Hobgood168). According to Karl Marx, a time will come when the oppressed can no longer take oppression, so they will rebel (Lenin 35). But their rebellion can be successful only if they form a united front. Rasmussen also reinstate this when he supports the idea of involving all of human in efforts aimed at achieving development and power sharing in a way that would please all concerned (13). It must be stated that Hobgood makes many valid points, many of which are in line with my personal line of thought. As earlier observed, the only point where her opinion slightly counters mine is when she says that it is possible for the victimiser to live in denial of the fact that they are benefiting from the wrong started by their progenitors. Work Cited Ayers, Bill. Memoirs of an Anti-War Activist. Massachusetts: Beacon. 2001. Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage. 2005. Barnard, Alan "Images of hunters and gatherers in European social thought," Eds. Lee Richard B. and Daly Richard H. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, p. 379. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006. Blevins, Carolyn D. Women in Christian History: A Bibliography. Macon, Georgia: Mercer Univ Press, 1995. Giddens A. et al. Introduction to Sociology. 7th ed. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2007. Gowdy, John. "Hunter-gatherers and the mythology of the market." Eds. Lee Richard B. and Daly Richard H. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006. Hobgood, Mary E.  Dismantling Privilege—An Ethics of Accountability.  Cleveland: Pilgrim Press. 2000. Lenin Vladimir. Karl Marx: A Brief Biographical Sketch with an Exposition of Marxism. Peking: Foreign Languages Press. 1967. Orwell George. Animal Farm. Fairfield: 1st Literary World. 2004. Purvis, June. "Women's History Today," History Today, Nov 2004, Vol. 54 Issue 11, pp 40- 42. Rasmussen, Larry. "Environmental Racism and Environmental Justice: Moral Theory in the Making?" Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 24 (2004) 3-28. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“How does Hobgood's arguments about dismantling race, class and gender Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1412303-how-does-hobgoodyies-arguments-about-dismantling
(How Does Hobgood'S Arguments about Dismantling Race, Class and Gender Essay)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1412303-how-does-hobgoodyies-arguments-about-dismantling.
“How Does Hobgood'S Arguments about Dismantling Race, Class and Gender Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1412303-how-does-hobgoodyies-arguments-about-dismantling.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Dismantling Race, Class, and Gender

Changing Roles of Race and Gender

This paper discusses the changing roles of work and family, policies affecting paid work and family, gender differences in other countries, family as an economic unit, labor market discrimination, and nonstandard employment for workers.... hellip; According to the report gender refers to a set of observable characteristics that are used to provide distinction between the male and female in any given population.... The female gender benefits from the part-time nature of the work and they can balance between the work and their family care....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Culture, Social Class, Gender, and Race in Crash

Culture, Social Class, Gender, and Race in Crash Modern society continues to be a place where people endure racial, social class, and gender discrimination.... Crash portrays the search for and development of cultural and gender identity or identities in films (Everett), the relationship between culture and social relationships and issues of individualism and community (Sefcovic), as well as relationships between high and low culture (Barnett and Allen).... One of the contradictions that people experience is characterized by their race and gender....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Race, Class and Gender

Effects of political Underrepresentation of Minority Groups Name Institution Effects of political Underrepresentation of Minority Groups Introduction Political representation refers to the involvement of representatives of certain groups in the society in politics.... hellip; Political representation is essential in the society because politics determine the laws that govern a country, and the method of distributing resources....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Discrimination Based on Race, Class or Gender

The paper "Discrimination Based on Race, Class or gender" discusses that the effects of how growing up in an impoverished broken home will result in the child also growing up to be a substance abuser.... As was seen previously with other drugs, while users might buy from somebody of another race, they ensure that they are with members of their own race while taking it (Bourgois and Jeffrey, 2009)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Implementation of Universal Primary Education Programs in the UK

The adequate provision of universal basic education to all children irrespective of social class, gender, ethnicity, religion or region depends largely on the teachers.... esearch suggests that preserves teachers often resist new knowledge that challenges their experiences with regard to the realities of race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and ability within the classroom and society (Pattnaik & Vold, 2001)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Islamophobia: The Problem of Labelling

Ironically, ex-colonies subjects were regarded, after all, as second class citizens.... The argument, first, discusses literature on race relations and immigration policies, more emphasis being laid on policies pertaining to Commonwealth subjects in Indian Subcontinent.... An examination follows of how race-based (addressing ethnicity, assimilation and multiculturalism issues) as opposed to faith-based (addressing religious practices, rights, and interfaith relations) protections have much influenced and/or mixed up contestations over Islam, Muslims and, most importantly, Islamophobia, if any, within a U....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Organization of Race, Class and Gender

In the essay “Organization of Race, Class, and gender” the author looks at the vehement drawer of the class system, which is the inferior mind.... hellip; The author states that the architect of this class system is, therefore, the individual who would go to any length to make sure that the differences are highlighted and the superiority is minimized as much as possible.... The vehement drawer of this class phenomenon is the changing trends within the society that leave a lasting impression on the minds of the people who are either lower in stature or who are unable to make both ends meet due to a number of reasons....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Class, Race and Gender

This essay "Class, Race and gender" presents the personal experiences of the writer, a middle-class female, in the workplace.... Being white may be perceived as an advantage in regard to work; however, there are two other elements, which can strongly influence the prospects of employees in modern organizations: age and gender.... y personal experiences in the workplace can lead to the assumption that inequalities among people on the basis of their gender and age still exist even if employers often take measures for the elimination of such phenomena....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us