Download file to see previous pages...
Out-of-date facilities and poor labor education often lead to workers being injured. In turn, employers rarely provide health insurance, and the burden of recovery expenses lies entirely on the employee. Lethal cases are also frequent. Thus, over 400 were buried alive after an apparel factory collapsed in Dhaka in May 2013 (Kazmin).
Secondly, since the poorer countries are dependent on the foreign cash inflows, huge multinational corporations can satisfy their selfish motifs deriving the most benefit out of the host country. As far as the third-world countries share similarly appalling economic conditions, it gives companies the scope to choose the location of their plant. To win a tough competition, governments and local authorities have to draw the attention of the organizations offering greater financial benefits. Unfortunately, fundamental laborer’s rights, such as a minimum salary and adequate workload are often neglected, and employees get unfairly exploited. Some of the most ludicrous concessions may even include unlimited tax holidays. Additionally, the firms do not bring technology that the local population could take advantage of. The deficit of education mixed with the lack of skill conduces to a situation where no economic growth is possible.
Furthermore, employing nearly 165 million children worldwide, sweatshops have a detrimental impact on education. For instance, four in every five Bangladeshi kids aged 10 and below attend school. However, of those employed only 20% are capable of combining work with classes (Salmon). The lack of education limits a person’s further employment opportunities and enables only to be a worker qualified enough for a sweatshop, where mainly low-skilled work is performed. Superficially, it may seem that sweatshops help to resolve the issue of unemployment in the absence of better alternatives, but digging deeper, one realizes that they only launch the vicious
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The author analyzes a lot of debate for a reason; there is no clear answer as to the manner of removing the negative characteristics, which make the workplace a sweatshop. He believes that customers are willing to pay for the name recognition. The most important factor is the costs they are willing to pay for the products from the sweatshops.
Here, the two companies major in product designing and marketing but rely on a number of contractors to build shoes and sew clothes that suit their specifications. One of the chief expectations by the two companies is high quality goods
This standard would be very welcome for local workers in an international sweatshop but may be prohibitive for the international company and removes the incentive for setting up shop in a developing country. When that happens then the job opportunities for local workers are lost.
Consumer thinking in western democracies can be dangerous. Young people started killing each other for a pair of Nike shoes which led to a public outcry. Nike is well known for Physical and verbal abuse of workers, hazardous working condition, extremely low wages and
People appear reluctant to work and lively chatters and laughter are amiss. Everyone is looking down at their tasks like chicken thrown in their cages, pecking at the feed. As much as we can sympathize with people who suffer from the
At this point, it is necessary to ponder on this question; would the existence of sweatshops result in more harm than the harm that would result from the closure of all sweatshops globally? In this respect, this discussion holds the argument that sweatshops are good.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Sweatshops for FREE!