Position Arguments on Immigration - Essay Example

Steve Breen (159) is concerned about the unusual trend concerning the measures developing countries deploy to curb illicit emigration. He states that though these countries come up with new regulations, codes, bills, and laws to facilitate eliminating the emigrant's menace, none of the measures seem to successfully combat illicit emigration.

Johnson (150) recommends tangible and practical approaches to illicit emigration by proposing that developed nations should liaise to come up with amicable approaches that sustain rapid information transfer concerning the chiefly known avenues utilized by illicit emigrants. Laura Carlsen (160) affirms that this approach may not be a quick solution approach though it’s viable and practical.

As I read and comprehend throughout this Immigration chapter, it’s evident that developed countries are torn between tracking and deporting illicit emigrants and retaining them in their host countries owing to sustaining their delicate economies through the provision of inexpensive labor and payment of levies.

            It’s shocking to note that influential individuals (comprising of President Nicolas Sarkozy and Samuel Huntington) are instigating a strategy to force the emigrants to learn and absorb the natives’ culture prevailing in their host countries (139). It’s also disturbing to note that even though developing countries such as the United States of America are firmly against illicit emigrants, some European Union activists maintain that illicit emigrants should be retained and bestowed liberty owing to their resourcefulness in supplying affordable and inexpensive labor to western Europe individuals who coincidentally have elevated rates of the aged individuals and therefore unable to sustain their farming processes void of labor aid from the emigrants (138). He asserts that many nations are aware of the merits and positive impacts emigrants contribute to their native countries, and this stalls the prevailing governments to wipe out illicit emigration (150).

            It’s fascinating to note that illicit emigrants’ remittances wired to their developing nations serve to boost their motherlands’ Gross Domestic Product and hence boost the economy of their own countries indirectly (138).

            I concur to have reviewed this subject before this deep, comprehensive read. I’ve always loathed illicit emigration owing to its illegal strategies. This context has however transformed my overall perspective on immigration having known that illicit emigration has a bright side to both the host nations and their motherlands.