Download file to see previous pages...
in O’Brien’s “The Things They Carried”, but the author illustrates the base that Kiley used to be at in “The Sweetheart of Song Tra Bong”, which is comparable to the base at the Khe Sanh. O’Brien’s intention in the book is to portray on how the war changes people and even if we know the story, what happens inside their minds is still impossible to “truly” understand. O’Brien writes, “Fine with me. But you don’t know human nature. You don’t know Nam” (O’Brien 97). The author wants to emphasize that while people strive to understand each other, this attempt would only be limited to personal opinion, and there can be no truth in every individual understanding. O’Brien adds, “He couldn’t pin it down; her body seemed foreign somehow – too stiff in places, too firm where the softness should be” (99). It appears that the author is trying to evaluate the responses of people in the war against his personal views on how people should really behave during a war scene.
But as aforementioned, the Battle of the Khe Sanh is one of the most controversial wars in history. Why? The war shows evidence of the fabrication of the American national identity. There are many misrepresentations of facts, particularly in the socio-cultural and political dimensions of the war. In order to obtain control over the infiltration routes south of the Demilitarized Zone and near the Ho Chi Minh Trail, the former French outpost along Khe Sanh was walled and nearly 6 thousand Americans and South Vietnamese were designated in order to secure the base (Browne, “Battlefields of the Khe Sanh”). In the succeeding passages, the display of horrific scenes including more than 150,000 projectiles and more than 100,000 pounds of explosive ordinance were released on the encompassing hillsides of once silent village of Khe Sanh (Clarke 185). The lush foliage will never go back to the valley that surrounded Khe Sanh and the pristine beauty that it used to have can no
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
After the French had lost an important war at Dien Bien Phu, the French were forced out of Vietnam resulting in the division of Vietnam (Digital History, 2012). The northern part of Vietnam was controlled by the communist and the south by a weak government that was pro-French.
However, the French too were waging a war against the local people, who wanted to be rid of the colonial yoke. Soon after the world war, the fighting for the colony by the French continued, but by the year 1954, after their defeat at Dien Bien Phu, they were forced to agree to the Geneva accords, whereby Vietnam was divided at the seventeenth parallel, and elections to reunify the country were to be held by 1956.
Understanding this reality is a critical facet of foreign policy. The conflict in Iraq (2003-2010) proved that this important lesson was not sufficiently learned following the U.S. involvement in Vietnam. If this lesson continues to not be fully understood or is ignored in the future the U.S.
Vietnam War, like many other wars of its era, was fought to prevent the spread of Communism across Asia. Usually referred to as the Second Indochina War, Vietnam War was the longest military battle in the history of United States and lasted from 1959 to 1975. It was fought between the North Vietnam (Communist) and South Vietnam (United States).
The Cold War, “which got its name from an article by George Orwell” (Orwell 1945)2, lasted for more than four decades, from 1947 to 1991. This standoff between the superpowers of then resulted in numerous events that were noted down in history, as brutal, callous, unjust and tense.
U.S. military aid to French occupation in Vietnam b. Formation of National Liberation Front c. U.S. military intervention d. Operation Rolling Thunder IV. The Attrition strategy a. Creation of “free-fire zones” b. Increased number of dead soldiers c. Anti-war protests in the U.S.
The paper also studies the various consequences of the war, which led to mass protests and campaigns against it. The paper concludes to show how the communist forces of North Vietnam won over the US forces and finally united the two part of Vietnam.
enter of Vietnam War is to date considered as the Battler of Khe Sanh.This is the historic bloody point of Vietnam War that marked the turning point of United States foreign policy and handed the communist North Vietnam a win over the south (OBrien 67). A summary analysis of
While united States claim withdrawing as a way of changing their fighting tactics, the North seems to have outsmarted them (Rottman 67-9). The particular of scene of Battler of Khe Sanh underscores the epicenter of the war and gives the insight into the true picture of
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Vietnam War for FREE!