Download file to see previous pages...
Health consumers are not only assured of affordable healthcare but also assured of provision of quality medical services. However, critics have emerged on whether the provision of affordable medical services is appropriate. The critics are based on the assumptions that the creation of affordable care act is expensive and the burden would be transferred to the tax payer. Additionally, medical institutions have also cited that they have incurred minimized profits since the creation of the affordable care act. However, the government stills maintains the position that the affordable care act is helpful for both individual as well as health institutions. This paper will analyze whether the provision of affordable act is appropriate. In addition the paper will create a balance between the main critics of the act and the benefits of the act and determine the appropriate position.
In an argument by McDonough since the creation of the affordable act in the United States significant changes has been experienced in the health care field (42). The author cites the number of health consumers that have been enabled to access quality health care services (McDonough 42). Before 2010, many consumers were not able to access quality medical services due to their financial status. They depended on small pharmacies and health clinics to access medical care. The quality of medical care provided in these facilities is below the required by the national health bodies. However, this remained the only healthy option available for poor persons. After the creation of the affordable act, people have been enabled to access medical care in more resourceful medial institutions at prices they could afford. In an argument by Donald this has significantly reduced immortality rates in the United States (44). The author presents data that proves the assumption that the number of death recorded after the creation of the affordable
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In my view the government is responsible for making equitable and affordable health care system for every American. The President and Law makers should strive to achieve universal health coverage in the United States sooner than later. Today Governments have become central to social policy and health care in most developed countries, as per the WHO’s report, “The World Health report 2000-health Systems: Improving performance”, their involvement is justified on the grounds of both equity and efficiency (WHO 2000).
Kennedy’s Community Living Assistance Services and Support (“CLASS”) Act, which attempted to provide a reasonably affordable, self-sufficient option for long-term care to all Americans (Lieber, 1998). The CLASS Act demonstrates the failure of legislation in a macroeconomic sense to provide for long-term care due to its inability to provide the services it aims to without the infusion of federal money.
Affordable Health Care Act was implemented in the year 2009 with an intention to provide citizens of America and its belonging states with well framed health care services (111th Congress 1st Session, 2009). United States of America is solely entitled with the sovereignty to implement this act according to the policy suggested in the Act.
The same report placed Singapore at top most position in the Asian Continent. Another Global Competitiveness Report of the year 2006-07 positioned Singapore at the top slot for infant mortality, eighth for life expectancy and at position nine for adult mortality rate (World Economic Forum, 2008:1).
Great steps have been notable in the matters of infant mortality rate, life expectancy and the general reduced mortality rates because of better health care as compared with the yester years. Great steps in reforming the medical system as we have it today in the United States dates back from the first quarter of the twentieth century where reformist took shape of the system to protect workers from wage losses as well as the escalating medical costs.
Consequent to the absence of either, not only does the United States stand out as unique in the midst of other Western democracies but as different from the majority of countries. Most countries have adopted those aspects of the welfare state system which outline the provision of healthcare
The main issue receiving attention in health care reform is the fact that the government should be more involved in the provision of health services within the country. It can also complement this through provision of health insurance for every American Citizen.
According to The National Coalition on Healthcare the total spending in healthcare in 2007 was $2.4 trillion or $7900 per person. In 2008 this amount was to rise by 6.9% which is two times the rate of inflation (par. 2). By 2017,
There has been an ongoing national debate as to whether the federal government should provide healthcare to poor citizens. There are many opinions on whether this should take place with some people promoting and others opposing such a move. This essay will examine
Health care is one of the basic human rights. Health is crucial for social and economic development. The health care system of the United States today is from decades of growth and maturity. The provision of healthcare is a major national issue that has led to a huge portion of the government’s budget is directed to a health system.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Should the united states government provide the affordable health care for FREE!