Download file to see previous pages...
This is probably because David Brooks wishes to explain to people about their denial. Throughout this article, David Brooks suggests that people do not accept that they engage in discrimination on a frequent basis (Brooks 1).
These people talk about the issue of diversity but they never practice it. For example, the same people who suggest to others that they should appreciate diversity live close to people who resemble them. They live next to people who work in the same places as they do or those who have the same education as they do. David Brooks has a fascinating context for his article because of several reasons. First, David Brooks approaches the issue of diversity from a modernized perspective. He introduces the notion of current neighborhoods in which there can never be diversity. David Brook also admits that he wishes that there would be neighborhoods where people with significant diversity would live together in unity (Brooks 1).
David Brooks realizes that he cannot convince his desired audience in an easy manner. He ensures that there are several rhetoric strategies to persuade his desired audience. Brook engages in an intense critic of the existing ideas on diversity. The entire article is a critique of the views, which modern people have on the issues of diversity. For example, Brook blames the nature of all the people who live in the current society. He says that the nature, which these modern people have, encourages them to practice extreme levels of segregation. David Brooks persuades his entire audience that there needs to be less discriminatory cases. This is because Brooks understands the negativity of segregation from his experiences (Brooks 132).
David Brooks continues to criticize the ideas on diversity in a strategic manner. In the article "People like Us", Brook mentions some of his personal experiences. The experiences that he mentions in the article clarify certain issues to his audience. For example, readers notice Brooks’
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The story begins with two white men who raped a ten-year old girl. The rapists are quickly arrested and were charged. The father to the girl, Carl Lee Hailey wanted to plan the murder of the two rapists through shooting with an aim of killing them. The case proceeded to court and the girl’s father was sentenced to death.
However, in my opinion, the western authorities handled the situation in a strict but humane way. Particularly in USA, the intelligentsia and academia played a key role to mitigate the excess of security measures. Students and professionals from foreign countries became a part of the process, and we all stood together to keep the American Dream alive.
According to Wallace, what we think and how we respond to situations is a matter of choice. He highlights that most if not all of us lack understanding of the cliché utilized in liberal arts about teaching students how to think. Liberal arts are about basic knowledge that all individuals should have in order to live with others in the society.
The researcher states that being a “good person” is a subjective idea for most people. It can be defined through many terms, such as being pleasant in the eyes, having unworldly-thoughts, doing helpful deeds, having a strong-rooted spiritual or religious self, or maybe a combination of everything that is defined by most people as well and good.
both the Democratic Party as well as the Republican Party in pandering to the what their voter group wants at the cost of the wants of the other voter group. A good example of this situation is the opposing rhetoric of respective party members John Edwards and Sarah Palin. The
David Brooks reasons that even though the US has been a home for different people coming from different racial and ethnic backgrounds, the whole American society is arranged in a way in which these people are specifically grouped accordingly. Such organization creates a generally homogenous American society nonetheless.
The theme of love is displayed everywhere in the novel. Many characters in the novel are driven by love to do things which they would not have done for other ordinary individuals. It is for this reason that the
Diversity in the United States has different interpretations owing to its melting pot in regards to the distinct lifestyles and cultures. David Brooks, through his essay ‘People Like Us,’ maintains that although the US is termed to be a diversified nation, homogeneity exists in certain aspects, such as the interactions across the populace.
The author states that racial segregation and oppression of African Americans especially those living in urban centers were common themes in all the three works. Brooks used her works to portray the extent of racial discrimination and the inequalities that characterized the American social and economic systems.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic A rhetorical analysis about People Like Us(by David Brooks) for FREE!