Download file to see previous pages...
The proponent agrees to have animal welfare instead.
In today’s move to go for animal rights, activists in this movement tend to suggest the people not to have animal’s meat at their table. Instead, they recommend fruits and vegetables. They also try to protect the animals by strongly opposing the use of them in various scientific experiments and medical trials. This is just some of the extremities brought about by strong advocacy towards animal rights. Non-human animals and their lives have been considered valuable and important and in such a way some other important issues are overlooked.
Whether non-human animals have the right to be treated just like as humans or not, the entire issue should be examined based on their capacity to go for a social contract. In a social contract, individuals have moral and political obligations in order to come into an agreement in the formation of the society. In other words, there is an obligation that needs to be fulfilled in order to create a society or a better place to live in. In short, there is a form of obedience that needs to be fulfilled and that should be implemented for as long as individuals are dependent on their needs within the society for the preservation of their lives (Rousseau 2).
Unfortunately, it is evident that animals do not have enough capacity to fulfill their moral and political obligations in the society. Indeed some of them are dependent on the lives of the people, but some of them also are dependent on the law of nature. The nature itself is under the authority of humans. Thus, each animal is still under the authority of man. The preservation of animals’ lives is indeed a moral obligation of man. Thus, they need animal welfare which has to be strongly established by man who has the authority over everything on earth. However, to give animals moral and political obligations is truly departing from the reality.
There is a governing principle which is the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Before going into the discussion regarding rights of animals, let us get a better understanding of what this movement actually is. Bocco states, “Animal Rights is a movement that intends to protect all animals from being exploited and abused by humans”. The main cause of this movement is to make people stop showing cruelty towards animals.
The man kind was never entitled to use animals for entertainment purposes to say the least. Realization has been around in this regard and throughout centuries people have raised voice for animals rights The first instance in this regard was noticed in 1635 when a legislation was brought to forefront that opposed use of sheep fur for wool making .
History would provide some evidence even of man being buried together with his pet animal as revealed in some archaeological studies, indicating man’s closeness to animals, particularly dogs. In fact, even to the present day, dogs, among other animals, have proven themselves to have great utility value to men, after having shown that they can herd, they can hunt, they can track, they can sled, they can police, they can identify, they can sniff and entertain and do a host of other special skills that men would be less capable of doing.
These laws that give protection to animal rights also govern the treatment which animals are projected to in medical research and slaughter for human consumption. Advocates have presented different approaches on animal rights. There is the protectionist side that looks at treatment of animals.
It is hard to believe the sheer number of technological advances as the human race has made within the past few decades. However, like any type of advancement, the price of this technological advancement has been an explosion of comfort and consumption oriented industries; not the least of which is that of “fast food”.
Question 1 Human ethical attitudes and practices with respect to the non-human animals exhibit an inquisitive instability. On the other hand, several people believe that it is unethical and wrong to inflict anguish and death on an animal for an inconsequential reason.
Concerning this point, various philosophical considerations surface in order to convince the public that we have indeed moral or ethical responsibilities towards animals. Arguments are therefore essential in this case and it is the primary purpose of the work at hand to critically evaluate and focus on the relevant articles that Michael Pollan, Tom Regan and Harriet Schleifer have made available for the public’s perusal online.
The research involves using animals for testing and trial purpose before using a particular type of drugs or treatment procedure to a human being. The animals used, in this case, have rights that control various factors on
Human beings tend to overlook the point that the general human race form pargt and parcel of the animals in the globe. The inflictions of pain, subject to stress, or even murder in the name of research are all
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Animal Rights for FREE!