Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln.
Abraham Lincoln and Julius Cesar shared unique similarities and differences in the lives they led. This is evident in the historical analysis of their lifestyles and leadership traits. …
Download file to see previous pages...
Apart that the two leaders were well respected in their time and beyond; they also share a similarity in the sense that they were both assassinated. They both lost their parents at very young ages and both left a child behind after their death. This paper will analyze and compare the lives Abraham Lincoln and Julius Cesar. Firstly the creation of America by its forefathers can be likened to the Roman Republic. The American forefathers aimed to create a nation with liberty, life and happiness. The comparison between the two nations dates back to the very beginning with Gorge Washington possessing similar qualities to Lucius Junius Brutus whilst King George portrayed the tyrant role played by King Tarquinius (Wineburg, 488-499). Julius Cesar was assassinated differently to Abraham Lincoln; however, the two events are comparable to certain a extent. One similarity between the two is that they were both assassinated by individuals, who were concerned about their leadership and what they would do with their power. In more simplistic words, the two were just simply killed due to the position they occupied. The two leaders both accumulated a larger following and more power as their term in office grew longer. As Julius Cesar began to implement certain policies, his senators began to feel threatened as they were of the opinion that their positions were under threat. However the difference between Cesar and Lincoln in terms of their attitudes towards power is that Cesar was power hungry and aimed to control as much territory as possible. Whilst in office he extended his term to five years rue in IIIyricum and Cispine Paul. However, Lincoln on the other hand was the exact opposite and did not want to control a larger territory (Wineburg, 488-499). Despite Cesar’s hunger for power, he felt it not for his own benefit but for Rome. Cesar frequently stated that if he was to step down from power, it would lead to a civil war in Rome. Cesar is quoted to have said, “I have long been sated with glory and power, however, it is more important for Rome than myself that I survive. If I was to be removed from my position, Rome will never know any peace. A civil war is likely to break out, one far worse than the last. In essence, Julius Cesar was an advocate for peace, a trait similar to that of Abraham Lincoln. Cesar fought for peace which led him to the accumulation of more enemies and his fight for change is similar to that of Abraham Lincoln. Despite the different positions they occupied, Abraham Lincoln and Julius Cesar were both military men. Lincoln enlisted in the army to be a member of the force fighting the Black Hawk war. While he was enrolled he quickly gained a promotion to the position of Captain for a wing of volunteers. Julius Cesar joined the Roman army with great ambition and quickly rose to the rank of military Commander. Their rise to political power was also different as Lincoln was required to perform a series of debates against his opponent. The two were both emulated and respected in their time. Both leaders wanted to make changes in their areas and they both gained enemies in the areas which they implemented their policies. Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in the year 1862 (Wineburg, 488-499). This act was intended to free all people and eradicate slavery in the Southern part of the country. Cesar gained enemies from the senate due to his advocation for peace whilst Lincoln was eventually assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, who shouted, “This is for the South!” before he shot him in the hea (Wineburg, 488-499). In fact, prior to being assassinated the emancipation proclamation led to a civil war in
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Pericles and Julius Caesar Pericles and Julius Caesar have come to be recognized by historians as two of the seminal figures of antiquity. While it’s clear both individuals share many similar traits, it’s perhaps in the differences that reveal the most about these individuals and the cultures of which they were apart.
He possesses outstanding qualities and greatness. His downfall is usually brought about by a greater cause or principle. A tragic hero has a tragic flaw, also known as “hamartia”, which is that quality which leads him to his downfall and eventually his death.
Organizations are becoming multicultural, people are sharing a global language and a global medium of communications, as technology is booming, small-connected world and changes are faster than ever now. Leaders need to be up to date with tendencies. “To be an effective leader of emerging organizations in the global world one will need to see the world and the workforce with a global mindset” (Marquardt & Berger 2000).
These conquests made a great number of Roman citizens very rich. However, the wars seriously broke the social and economic bases of Rome. Many peasants were deprived of their property. The Roman Senate, which initially was a certain form a small city administrative council, now proved own incapacity to govern the enormous empire.
"With the possible exception of the depth of Confederate resolve, nothing shaped the Civil War more than the United States Constitution." (Neely, Mark E, Jr.; "The Last Best Hope of Earth: Abraham Lincoln and the Promise of America"; Harvard University Press; pp.91)
ln, it is said, took the law into his own hands in meeting the attack on Fort Sumter and subsequently in dealing with the problems of internal security, emancipation, and Reconstruction. The author of a well-known treatise on emergency government in the Western political
and military commander of the empire, but also he obtained sound reputation and applause from all corners in diplomatic affairs and politics, by dint of his innate qualities of head and heart, he had been gifted with by Nature. It is therefore he was adopted as a Roman deity
age that he cannot enjoy his own freedom and he forged messages with different handwriting and made the look like they came from Rome citizens claiming that Caesar had become very powerful and should be killed. Since Brutus honor for Rome was in his heart, he saw it worthy to
Captivatingly, a “true friendship” is the only one that cannot be subjugated, even after death. In relation to that Cassius and Brutus, have used their friendship and the other schemer to their benefit, and to Caesar’s weakness.
Abraham Lincoln became a martyr following his assassination in 1865. In history books, he has been portrayed as a crusader in anti-slavery. In death, he became a great emancipator. However, he refused to play this role in life. The interest of Lincoln in slavery seems to be a political as opposed to a moral agenda.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln for FREE!