The reasons for such an approach are as follows: readily available information provides more individuals with access to knowledge, ease of acquisition has not been proven to increase the overall level of “stupidity” within society, the mere existence of a tool in and of itself cannot and should not be understood to promote laziness, and the human mind naturally forgets it must be referred – Google, and search engines like it, merely provide a means by which such a natural process can take place more easily (Carr 1). Within such an understanding, it is the first of these arguments, regarding the ease of acquisition, which must be understood. Zimmer, in his article “How Google Is Making Us Smarter” notes the following: “The Internet and iPhones seem to be crashing the gate of the mind, taking over its natural work and leaving it to wither away to a mental stump. As plausible as this picture may seem, it does a bad job of explaining a lot of recent scientific research” (Zimmer 1). Although Carr fundamentally disagrees with Zimmer, the fact of the matter is that his method of argument is not solid as it relies on unsubstantiated evidence and hearsay to determine that Google and the likes are in fact making us “stupid”. In such a way, it is the belief of this author that the framework and rubric put forward by Zimmer is far superior and represents a more reasonable and actionable means of defining the relationship between technology and human development.