Rhetorical Critique - Essay Example

If the needs of a particular group are met then it would be said that the writer was effective in his work. In this case they have to employ the language in an effective manner so as to meet a certain rhetoric situation (Wilhoit 41-45). Jonathan Riel the author of Obama and Reagan: A Rhetoric critique and declaration of not war in Libya targets the same population in addressing the challenges and issues affecting the American society. In his first article that touches on Obama and Reagan, he tends to draw two parallel rhetoric lines between the two leaders.

His focus on Obamas campaign turns out to be rhetoric. According to him Obamas mode of communications changes immediately the campaign is over. In this case it implies that governing cannot be the same as running or organizing for a campaign. For instance, Obama employs the use of impersonal style of communication which on his side differs a lot from the persuasion used for the public especially if one is running a campaign. This case greatly differs from the type of communication of any governmental official once elected in office.

His speech was compared to Reagan style of speech that was challenging. The author of this blog tends to be bias against Obamas administration; he tries to capture the attention of his audience by portraying Obamas organization as an organization that seeks the merciful help of his citizens which is only applicable when seeking for votes but his reach by the citizens on his office seems to be impossible. The main aim of bringing this point is to ridicule the administration and also to provoke the citizens (Lanham 58).

The author tries to use persuasive and provoking to the audience by pointing out that Obama has a very poor view of Reagan administration. In this regard, he does not come out with proper reasoning to support this but instead he says that Obama portrayal of Reagan leadership was that of one who could not steer the American economy forward. His argument seeks to demand and seek his audience attention. Nevada interview has been known to have attracted a huge crowd of scholars of the Rhetoric communication.

His style of communication during the interview employed the use of keen attention by the public as persuasive. The author also tries to portray how other leaders have viewed Obama (Riehl n.d). His idea of the American dream is critiqued because Reagan was the official party property of the Republican. The American 40th president presented his speech which was viewed by the blogger as rhetorical act the speech was made to the public which demonstrated no signs of campaigns. Obama is believed to have integrated all the elements to form his own rhetoric.

Reagan speech revolved much on the future of the America on the other hand Obama opinion is to overcome the presidency of the opposing party which he relates to future. Obamas speech was concerned with uniting all races of the American people. He preaches the message of hope of the American people. This message is also preached by Reagan on his public addresses. These two share the same feature in the sense that they both emphasize the need for positive growth in the American society (Lanham 71-80).

This is seen as aspirations of the people of the people. Reagan had an aspect of blaming the fore fathers this aspect was absent on Obama this is portrayed in his speeches where he demonstrates how the slaves were able to fight