Rotenberg’s text has proven to be viable resource to aid students become better writers. The book is based on an array of approaches that provides the reader with critical thinking techniques that could help them build a strong base for argument. The author outlines various philosophical approaches from other scholars such as Roger and Aristotle, while also manipulating models that support the reason for these argumentative approaches. The first three chapters make up the first part that is the understanding of argument, while the fourth chapter is part of the second part that is the analysis of the elements of the argument. In the first chapter, Rotenberg combines Aristotle’s rhetoric and Rogerian tactics to approaching an argument. She points out that although a rhetoric being is able to identify a critical point of persuasion, they are not always able to enlighten everybody with the correct point of view. “A physician knows what is required of them to heal a patient, but they are not always able to cure all their patients.” (Rotenberg, 2011, p. 3). The Rogerian argument aims towards persuasion of one party by asking one to open up their minds by getting in the shoes of the other. She further points out the Toulmin Model, which provides some terms of argument that purport the claim, support and warrant as the guide to writing when tackling and analyzing an argument. In the second chapter, Rotenberg advocates for critical reading for the writer to have a good understanding of the argument
they are about to make.