This topic is likely to be tremendously engrossing and enjoyable to read. This is because it will evaluate the hypothesis in procedures that will lead to the final conclusion.
One must support this statement that science must destroy religion since it makes sense. Science is an intellectual activity that humans carry out to discover information concerning the natural world, and ways of organizing information into meaningful patterns. Religion refers to a collection of beliefs, worldviews, and cultural systems that relate humanity to spirituality and moral values (Harris 12). These are two different fields that guide people in making various conclusions in life.
The main idea in this essay is an analysis of religion and science that people use to form reasonable claims that help them understand the universe and human beings. It critically analyses the misleading aspect of religion that is used to make people believe various propositions that cannot happen in the real world. It explains the main differences between science and religion giving a deeper explanation behind the success of religion. This forms the thesis statement since it expounds on the irreconcilable commitments of religion that amount to human conflict (Harris 34). It explains that our fear of provoking religion makes us incapable of criticizing ideas that maladaptive and absurd. It summarizes the whole paper by giving a detailed explanation of religion and the effects of relying on it. Harris wrote this to inform people
that the difference between religion and science is inherent, and one must forego one to support the other. He explains that people must avoid human ignorance in instances where they think they have compelling reasons for their beliefs. He argues that we should not support propositions that we cannot support by using reasoning. Harris argues that religion is a wrong method of interpreting happening since it relies on faith instead of reasoning (Harris 49). He wishes to accomplish a mission of informing people the antagonism that lies between religion and science. Religion calls people to believe in propositions without consideration application of reasoning. This is a misleading statement since religion is growing to be incompatible with both global and civil society due to these problems. Harris is calling for scientists not to keep silent but talk about ethics and spiritual experience. He hopes that his readers will understand the fact that we should not exclude our state of consciousness and ethical intuitions as religious requires us. He calls us to come up with ways of satisfying our emotional needs and not just rely on propositions that rely on faith. People must learn to invoke the power of ritual and mark the various transitions that demand profundity in human life (Harris 58). A person who disagrees with Harris will describe the tone of this piece as pessimistic. This is because he only argues on the negative aspects of religion and avoids on the positive aspect of it. Harris explains the religion propositions that present lack of substantial consideration of reason. They apply faith to come up with solutions to the problems. The people who agree with this piece would describe the tone as reasonable. This is because the issue that he analyzes clearly presents the occurrence of situations in the world. It is true that science uses intellectual activities that humans carry out to discover information about the natural world. This ensures that human beings apply reasoning to emerge with conclusions on various environmental issues. He explains that we should use reasoning adopt ethical ways of analyzing