Here it will be attempted to compare and contrast ideas in Sandra Cisneros’s essay Only Daughter with Deborah Tannen’s essay Sex, Lies, and Conversation with regard to the following elements: the purpose of gender, the structure, and the purpose of the essays and how the action of writing assists with the development of identity or answering the question ‘why’? …
Download file to see previous pages...
The purpose of gender plays different roles within Cisneros’s and Tannen’s pieces. Cisneros makes a big deal that she was the only daughter of a family of seven children. She desperately wanted to have her father be proud of what she did: writing. “I wanted my father to understand what it was I was scribbling, to introduce me as ‘My only daughter, the writer.’ Not as ‘This is only my daughter. She teaches.’ Es maestra— teacher. Not even profesora.” The structure of Cisneros’s story is short and to the point. The purpose of the essay is to show how Cisneros’s professional development progressed from being basically an unknown writer to, ten years later, having had a lot of success as a writer. The purpose of gender in Tannen’s essay is to show the difference in communication patterns between men and women. “The communication problems that endanger marriage can't be fixed by mechanical engineering. They require a new conceptual framework about the role of talk in human relationships.” Essentially, Tannen is saying we need to be able to rework the role of conversation between men and women. The structure of the essay begins by Tannen telling a story about how women talk less in public than in men. The purpose of the essay was to draw attention to why this mix-up in communications causes divorces. The explanation for the purpose of gender in these two essays is completely different betwixt the two—and the opposite sex (men) is mentioned in Cisneros’s piece but not nearly as much as in Tannen’s. The structure of the essays were different in that Cisneros’s piece was short and Tannen’s long. Both essays had a common purpose, however, which was to see the value in womens’ contributions. III. The Outcomes From the Two Stories ? The outcome from Sandra Cisneros’s story was her professional development. “Last year, after ten years of writing professionally, the financial rewards started to trickle in. My second National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship. A guest professorship at the University of California, Berkeley. My book, which sold to a major New York publishing house.”3 The outcome for Tannen was talking about what bound women together: conversation. “For women, as for girls, intimacy is the fabric of relationships, and talk is the thread from which it is woven.”4 The explanation that draws a line in the sand between these two different pieces is that Sandra Cisneros is talking about how she, as a writer, overcame her struggles in order to become a writer and to ultimately make her father proud—which was the sole greatest achievement that Cisneros found?worthwhile to achieve. The main attraction of Tannen’s article is that she is talking about how gender differences severely impair relationships and lead to divorce. In terms of theme, the outcomes from these two storied essays are vastly different. In fact, Tannen’s assertion at the end of her piece that people who cannot work things out should just get divorced, makes all of her prior assertions about relationships seem invalid—because she is advocating divorce. This proves that she doesn’t really value the male-female relationship enough to want to preserve it—
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The Ideas in Sandra Cisneross Only Daughter and Deborah Tannens Sex, Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1435061-the-ideas-in-sandra-cisneross-only-daughter-and-deborah-tannens-sex-lies-and-conversation
(The Ideas in Sandra Cisneross Only Daughter and Deborah Tannens Sex, Essay)
“The Ideas in Sandra Cisneross Only Daughter and Deborah Tannens Sex, Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1435061-the-ideas-in-sandra-cisneross-only-daughter-and-deborah-tannens-sex-lies-and-conversation.
Both writers acknowledge the contributions of their roots and family ties in the process of learning to find remarkable essence in English and love of communicating effectively especially with their parents who occur to be the primary concern in their attempt to simplify approach in writing.
Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne. In 2010, the group of private developers under umbrella of Absolute Group (one of biggest property developers in Moscow and Moscow region) introduced to the property market specially designed office buildings tailored to the retail sales.
Finally, I will present a personal perspective on Deborah Tannen’s theory and attempt to determine whether it is true or untrue. Firstly, Tannen speaks about differences in the mechanics of leading a conversation between men and women. The physical positions taken by males and females misalign, Tannen observes.
There are many ways through which the ideals of this relationship are physicalized in the play. First, it is an undisputed fact that Lavinia is actually the only daughter of Titus. Titus is a dignified Roman soldier who is strongly dedicated to his own ethical code of conduct.
Broken marriages are harming adults and children, creating a self fulfilling prophecy of a future which is more fragmented. Affairs within marriages, and children who wind up living in the emotional vacuum created by the absence of one of their biological parents, also add to the corporate social strain.
ry of George Eastman, a poor worker (enacted by Montgomery Clift), nephew of a wealthy industrialist who dreams for the limelight and finds the hope of the luxurious social lifestyle in Angela (Elizabeth Taylor). Apart form depicting romance it reveals the way economic
did not gain a substantial bonus, it might be a coincidence or her performance would actually not be measuring up to the standard of the evaluators irrespective of the general impression of her performance upon the coworkers. Yes, women do apologize more often than men but if
Her writings were mainly because of her father and the community at large in trying to portray the cultural practices, which dominated her community. At the beginning, her father looked enthusiastic of his child’s education. Due to cultural practices, he loses satisfaction because he sees Cisnero is not married.
This thesis tries to evaluate and discuss the communication theory towards men and women in order to see whether it is a valid and proven theory up to date. These communication behaviors are different between men and women and
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Ideas in Sandra Cisneross Only Daughter and Deborah Tannens Sex, Lies, and Conversation for FREE!