Problem Identification and Quality Improvement at Stop It Limited - Case Study Example

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AT STOP IT LIMITED Table of Contents Executive summary 3 INTRODUCTION 4 PROJECT PLAN 5 PDSA elements and tools of QC 6 FMEA Analysis 6 Step I Pre-work 7 Step II Development 7 Step III Development 8 Action Plan 10 Recommendation 10 References 11 Executive summary Stop IT LTD is a company primarily established to deal with manufacturing of brake system of high performance widely used by industries that deals with motors. The frequent clients in this particular company include the Adrenaline motorsport, Ariel Motor Company, automobile from mutual market and Ascari. The company generates substantial profit in the market because of its high quality products making be on top of its competitors. On the hand, this reputation is at stake because of the complaints received in relation to their current invention, which consist of the AB7 System. Because of the fault in the design, stakeholders are trying to figure out the next move to do away with the fault that is trying to jeopardize the future of the company. Adrenaline motorsport, have been affected by this fault. This problem has been intensified by the fact that two of major clients have stopped pending investigations. The current problem will be finished only when the investigation is finished. FMEA factors that are in breaking system are analyzed in this report among other products in organization production list. This will give the company an opportunity to implement the hitches making braking system faulty. The steps carried out within the company would be constructed, basing on the information gathered from any kind of research (T. 2005). INTRODUCTION There is budget in most companies put aside for errors as well as transformations that have not yet been predicted by the company. Most companies do progress because of the glitches that are existing, exchange to a number of problems, which make the organization better and have an organized plan. It is a fact that, Stop IT is encountering a problem that encroaches their breaking system. It finds that to improve and to have advantage over its current competitors, it must have an alternate for these issues (Park 2006). The findings to be used have to couple with a risk assessment that will watch and give room to the solutions for the problems to achieve. The said solutions will include the delivery to the esteemed clients within the market that the company has an eye on. PROJECT PLAN This encompasses drafting section of steps that can be put into practice to find a more realistic problem solving value. The planning entails having a well-acknowledged problem that will be comprehensive to what the company will be dealing with. This is known as, problem recognition terminology. Trying to solve any particular problem is one of the planning steps that every company treats it with a lot of weight. The major component used entails recognizing the particular problem. In this context, the firm is seen as being administrative. This indicates that there a grouped arrangement in the association resulting to information access to be difficult and impossible process. Identification of a given problem in Stop IT is termed as failure of breaki0ng system. Another plan viewed as important is the improvement of quality. The problems narrowed down to the departments that are incompetent within the company. Modern styles employed here by the teams inline with technology, makes operational problem solving team. As a result, the firm will get suitable invention mentality in addition to inspiration (Minor 1991). Another section that is added and ought to be considered is the Sustainability. Sustainability is an operation that is able to withstand test of time as well have investors continued hopes of success. Great examples that show modifications of operation include the external factors and the in-build. The conditions of operations should show the standards within HRM as well capabilities, which will yield the X factor used in the analysis. With a good number of staff, there should be a systematic training technique and frequent evaluations within the firm. Ineffective training of employees in the company, will lead to a drawback because of inadequate advantage in the company. PDSA elements and tools of QC To protect the system that is used by management of various companies, there are a number of tools that ought to be put in place to do so. These mechanisms comfort to show the originality position of the whole process of planning, which has earlier been planned. Another method that has been put into practice to find solutions to solutions to the problems of the company is through brainstorming. For instance, Pareto analysis is a greater way that can be used to calculate and analyze the operational failures that are inline with Stop IT. FMEA Analysis This is an analysis that is inclined together with a failure mode in it. It is denoted as a design activity that is strong and significant in the design of the breaking system in the organization. This mechanism is known to be world wide because it is relevant to any other industry that is used in the manufacture of the system. This technique is designed to stop any failures in the near future and to develop existing product design. This will ensure that the company attains flexibility in the design of the product in order to sustain it in the near future of which it will entail examining an evaluation. By putting this mechanism or technique in practice, then the failure can be reduced for by risk, which allows preventive measure to be included, that will allow the failures to be alleviated (T. 2005). Common area of application of the FMEA is within the following areas Find the failures that are likely to occur in the near future in the mechanisms and the risks in the design plan of the breaking system. The phases that can be put in practice to reduce the amount of risk or failures in operation. A track up plan that pushes a company to come up with a rough figure of the results and draft an emergency plan.  The FMEA steps followed to ensure that development of a product is done at its best. The steps are discussed below. Step I Pre-work This step is meant to estimate the previous faults that where encountered in the firm, to achieve an improved FMEA. Documents utilized in this particular step include FMA that is made available within that mode of failure. On the other hand, tool utilized contain block diagram mechanism that becomes necessary incase one choose parametric diagram. The mechanism or the tool that is used here will be used to generate the second step. Step II Development This is a supplement stage, after critical scrutiny of variables in the other section. This phase enables the Stop Company to put in place the signs that may help in the removal as well as a rise in stakeholders. In this phase, the indicators of failures are ensured that they are clear. The development features emanate from the problem itself in addition to other models about the product yields and its topographies. Step III Development Past failures that the firm has had contribute to current impending problems to be solved. Risk management is a criteria demonstrated by RPN contrary to FMEA which uses categorization. The actions involved here need accuracy in terms of coming up with values for use. This will be ensured by strict and an up to date leadership of the plants. FMEA on braking system. Item failure mode cause effect of failure Higher effect End effect severity Dormancy time Risk level mitigation Brake manifold Leakage of A to B O-ring compression pressure decreased within main brake  system No left brake system Loss of position control Complete break down In built test for a period of 1 minute Not allowed hydraulic independent system Key issues considered are shortages in addition to procedure of operation that were not up to standard level. When this are followed the failure will definitely averted. Item Potential failure mode Potential failure effects The handbrake as correct level of friction at brake pad and wheel rim. Low friction levels leads to poor braking system Braking not in desired time hence accidents. Analyzing the set up of the braking system reveals that one component had effects on other components. This calls for changing the entire set up. The analysis revealed various reasons behind the brake failure. There was foreign material that produce friction, poor lubrication might have resulted from bad routings and cable blinds, are among the key causes of misbehavior. To attain best performance correction measure should do away with causes (P. 2007). FMEA (design analysis) Define function (2) Identify failure mode (3) Severity (4) Causes and occurrence (5) Detection methods (6) Risk priority no. (7) Action taken (8) Action Plan Readjustment of the failure value that was found in the system Making sure that designs are standard and the operations towards implementation is followed to the latter. Evaluation of products before release should be a thorough process leaving no room to slightest faults. Using FMEA generates clear-cut reasons an action plan to be implemented. Other tools used do not guarantee solutions and might land the company back to problems. Recommendation Stop IT should emphasis responsibility and accountability from its employees. This can be achieved by restructuring the leadership structure and retraining if they cannot employ expert technicians. This process calls for injecting new amount of money into a vetting process and salary increment to boost employee spirit of working. This ensures that the company is always at per with emerging technology. The company should also shift from the traditional evaluation methods to sophisticated methods that easily unmask faults in systems. Modern computerized evaluation and testing procedures with expert in the quality assurance department will yield desired outcome. By doing the above correction measures Stop IT LTD is poised to regain its market glory. References AHAMAD, M. and Ammar,M (1989). Performance Characterization of Quorum-consensus algorithms for Replicated Data. Transactions on Software Engineering, 2 (2), 9. BORGIDA, A., and Jagadish,H.V. (1989). Efficient Management of Transitive Relationships in Large Data and Knowledge Bases. Conf. on the Management of Data 89, 1 (1), 10. DALE, van Iwaardeen. (2013). Managing Quality. vol.2. 3 ed., Chicago, J. wiley $ sons Inc. van, 1. MINOR, F. J., & Slade, L., (1991). Managing Employee Career Transitions. vol.1. 1 ed., Lexington, MA, Lexington Books Publishers. 1, 1. P., Batalden (2007). Teaching Quality Improvement. Teaching Quality Improvement, 298 (1), 1059-1061. PARK, SM (2006). Lean production. TQM and Cullture of Company, 18 (3), 263-281. PARSLEY, K. (1995). health care Quality Assurance. quality assurance, 2 (1), 9-13. T., peterson (2005). FMEA. vol.3. 2 ed., London, Manchester. FMEA series, 2. Read More