Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1657218-academic-argument
https://studentshare.org/education/1657218-academic-argument.
The central claim for the paper is that ‘States need to control what teachers teach to children’.
Supporting Claim1:
States have the responsibility to set uniform educational standards to help teachers know what they should teach and what they should make their children learn.
Reason1:
The state or country is responsible to create opportunities for the local community to be productive. The state draws clear goals and objectives to develop a curriculum to be applied in the schools through teaching processes. In this regard, uniform educational standards are also important for developing a shared and common mindset about social and cultural values.
Ground1:
Educational standards help both teachers and students in utilizing their potential in accordance with the expectations and standards set by the schools (Lee, 2003).
Supporting Claim 2:
States need to make teachers teach the social, moral, and cultural values of the society to children in order to develop a strong generation to protect the cultural and social norms.
Reason 2:
The community needs to maintain social values to strengthen the foundations of the new generation. Strong social and moral values are essential for developing a strong society. Therefore, states need to enforce teachers to teach their cultural and social values to children so that they can reflect the signs of a strong local community when they grow up.
Ground 2:
Dewey discussed that the distinction between progressive and traditional education is not particularly meaningful: what really matters is the vision of society for action that an education embodies (Kaplan, 1997).
Supporting Claim 3:
Another claim is that states should provide social and job protection to teachers in order to make them adhere to the agreed teaching standards.
Reason3:
Teachers need protection from the states even when they teach what the states want them to teach in order to perform required social development based on objective learning. Based on a clear contract between state or local schools and teachers, no one would criticize what the teachers teach. Moreover, increased job opportunities and a better job environment for teachers would also play a significant role in making this profession attractive for teachers.
Supporting Claim 4:
Another claim to support the main claim is that states should consider parents’ concerns in developing the curriculum for children.
Reason 4:
Parents have a strong concern about what teachers teach to their kids in local schools. States’ role in the development of the curriculum is very important for parents to determine whether they should put their kids in public schools to learn the particular curriculum of science, religion, or moral values or not. Obviously, parents play an important role in involvement and participation in terms of creating successful educational endeavors.
Ground 4:
Curriculums help in determining what students need to achieve or do in any particular academic year (Perkins-Gough, 2003). Parents always expect schools to provide the best education to their children to help them in marking their educational achievements (Seginer, 1983).
Supporting Claim 5:
Another claim is that state control helps in improving teachers' professional performances through performance appraisal.
Reason 5:
Performance appraisal helps in determining whether an employee is meeting the standards set by the company or not. In the case of teachers, this appraisal will help in knowing whether teachers are doing their jobs in accordance with the standards or not. If a teacher is found negligent in following the standards, proper actions can be taken against him/her, whereas certain rewards and incentives can be given to the obeying teachers as motivational tools.
Conclusion
States need to control what teachers in order to let teachers know what they should teach children and what not. The government of any particular country needs to set some standards for teachers which they should follow to meet the cause of making a productive society. The reason behind this is that a state is mainly responsible for making the community productive through improved teaching processes. States should also add subjects about culture in the curriculum because a community needs to uphold its social and cultural values in order to develop a strong society. Similarly, states also need to provide social and job protection to their teachers so that they can focus their attention properly on the development of the society and nation. Moreover, states also need to improve the trust of parents in public schools by setting and implementing the curriculum considering the concerns of parents. These were some of the claims that justify the point that states need to control what teachers teach to children.
Read More