Hidden intellectualism - Essay Example

 Hidden Intellectualism The hidden intellectualism by Gerald Graff is the article where the author tries to explore how the students who do not perform well in school are inherently not intellectuals. This is based on the street smarts that most students pose when they are out of the school. He explores the way the street marts are just, but academic pursuits, and not intellectuals. He asserts that people have the cultural respect to the education that is institutionalized and not the education outside the institution (Graff, 2010). He presents the way individuals view the street marts to be non-academicians and value the education, basing on the academics, mind very narrowly focusing on the subjects and the texts that appear weighty and academic. He argues against these suggestions, and supports the fact that even the fields we consider not intellectuals are intellectuals. He asserts that the issue of the street marts can be very helpful in sparking the student’s interests towards the academic pursuit leading to very good performance. Generally, Graff supports intellectualism in the street smart students (Graff, 2010). I believe this is true; I have tried the same and come to realize that I will not consider myself biased as I present the paper concerning Graff’s arguments. For instance, Graff uses the illustrations of the sports and the magazines to support his points. Though his examples may not be applicable to everyone, but to some individuals. For me, I would have expounded on the idea of the based on the teaching also in school. For instance, he would have said that the street-smart students are also scholarly (Graff, 2010). Deborah Tannen Her writings are based on the way work fights for the individual’s lives. She critically analyzes some of the cultural aspects of life that influence people. She refers to a habit as an argument culture. She asks people to look at the world from an adverse point of view. She asserts that the best method of approaching ideas, conversations is in the form of a debate. She illustrates these with examples of company news, the company that looks for the news anchors who can show extremely odd views so that they can present the two sides of the situation. She argues the way, such a culture is the day-to-day routine that the public interactions are used, and to them they believe the way one thinks. According to her, an individual has to pose a debate so that the other individuals can agree or disagree to the point. However, moderation should also be applied when it comes to a debate. This is because even the debates have their own purpose, though they are not the only options of understanding and viewing the world. According to Tannen, people’s culture is based on the personal habits and arguments that seek the winning and losing end. She states that when it comes to the conflict for instance, there must be an opposing and proposing side, and in this case, there must be a disagreement and agreement (Tannen 2010). According to her, it only destroys the society and sets people in the battle mindset situations whereby every battle must lead to hurting. She emphasizes that it only makes people think for irrelevant rhetorical limitations from the opposing end, instead of listening to the important issues. She argues and views agonizing response as the planned contentiousness, pre-patterned, without thinking, and involves fighting so that one can reach his or her goal, and this directs the whole society in that direction. She illustrates the consequences of the whole thing based on her observation, which supports the facts that this leads to the trends of opposition that destroys our society. She asserts that the society is full of connections and authorities, alienations, forms and habits of the communities leading to a detached state that is full of hostility (Tannen 2010). I do agree with Tannen, but she fails to give the alternatives to the issues she bases on in her writing. She assumes that debates are the best way of solving issues. Chapter: I take your point, Entering Classroom Discussion This chapter 11 deals with the way class discussions influence the student’s performance. They assert that it is not just a matter of discussion, but every group member should be geared towards one goal on. It calls for the application of what they have learned in the classroom, as well as the other academic writings. It also involves framing the mind of an individual while trying to make a response. They have to connect with the previous speaker on page 142. They assert that as a writer, she or he has to involve other writers by mentioning them, they should explain in details to make the reader to understand the points clearly without having to go back and read the whole book that is being referred (Ferguson, 2013). They talk about how people looking at an argument from both sides. That is, one should see the writer’s argument and relate it on the individual's point of view (p. 147). This helps the reader to be an active participant while reading. There should be a better imagery of writing than steals the reader’s imaginations. The authors assert that the students always miss that point, they only ventriloquism the views that we do not believe in them. The arguments that can be discussed, but we go ahead to accept them, yet we have other points to argue against. On page 150, the author states that, this is applied in most of the texts and essays. He illustrates that “when they said I say is about something nobody talked about” chapter 12 talks the way the readers have to get involved in the reading, put there, how the reader has to set, an argument that can attract criticism as well as give options to the audience (Ferguson, 2013). The authors are all on the same line as the main point here is based on the academics and academicians, and the ways to be not just an academician, but also as an intellectual. The hidden intellectualism by Gerald Graff is the article where the author tries to explore how the students who do not perform well in school are inherently not intellectuals. This is based on the street smarts that most students pose when they are out of the school. While chapter twelve talks about how people looking at an argument from both sides. Tannen states that one should see the writer’s argument and relate it on the individual’s point of view. Her writings are based on the way work fights for the individual’s lives. She critically analyzes some of the cultural aspects of life that influence people. She refers to a habit as an argument culture. References Ferguson, Dianne L. (2013) “Working Together: Groupwork, Teamwork, and Collaborative Work among Teachers.” Urban school. National Institute for Urban School Improvement Graff, Gerald. (2010) “Hidden Intellectualism."  They Say, I Say. 2nd Ed.  Eds.  Graff, Gerald   and Birkenstein, Cathy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 198-205. Print. Tannen, Deborah. (2010.) Agonism in the Academy: Surviving the Argument Culture. 2nd edition. W. W. Norton % Company, Read More