Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1458915-real-or-imaginary-child-with-disabilities-into-a
https://studentshare.org/education/1458915-real-or-imaginary-child-with-disabilities-into-a.
The most suitable model to use is a Response to Intervention (RTI) model. This an academic intervention method used to help children with needs such as difficulty learning or learning disabilities. It is an early intervention, which prevents failure in academics by measuring progress of such a child frequently, and inducing interventions that are research based to instruct and aide children with such difficulties. Some children do not respond to such interventions, and their problem is deep rooted in that the children could have disability stemming from the biological make-up (Vaughn, 2010).
Unlike the discrepancy model that is common for the normal children with ability, this model will be an alternative to Frank who is in need of supplementary education. Personnel The personnel who will handle the process will be three normal classroom teachers, who will teach mathematics, a language subject, and a science subject respectively. The teachers who will handle Frank will be individuals who are highly qualified and trained adequately to implement this model. They will be individuals who understand Frank better and will be able to connect with him in order to get the required results.
The selected teachers will compile a comprehensive report within a period of five weeks and will use the report to provide the child with the supplementary three-tier program. This is as recommended by Phaneuf (2008). Accommodations and modifications Accommodations and modifications will focus on changing the teaching techniques, and assessment on Frank’s progress. The accommodations the teachers will consider into the curriculum include one-on-one quizzes, group discussion with the other children, large print materials to enable Frank see and comprehend well, colored charts, extended or shortened assignments and assessments.
They will also use pictures, animation, colors, and sounds to help Frank grasp and understand the content quickly. Some of the modifications that the teachers will consider include, changing the grading scale particularly if Frank fails to compete with the rest and introduction of special education and special education teacher in tier three if Frank utterly fails to improve. Strategies School screening Assessment This is the first strategy that will help identify Frank’s strengths and weaknesses.
Screenings will last for a period of five weeks (Phaneuf 2008: 54).The first thing the teachers will carry out is to assess whether he requires such interventions. This will take place in a normal classroom where he will get academic surveillance. This will enable evaluation of the Frank’s performance based on the basic subjects in the curriculum such as mathematics, sciences, and languages. His ability to perform tasks such as reading and comprehending, solving mathematical sums and carrying out practical tasks will undergo evaluation and the report will contribute significantly towards identifying his strengths and weaknesses.
The teaching will follow the curriculum of the classroom. It will be research based, one tested in the field and proved effective and containing all the fundamentals of teaching a normal child with able faculties. This screening will establish a specific criterion, which will rank the Frank’s performance in various categories. The percentile score will show whether his performance is poor, average, above average or excellent. Comparison of the
...Download file to see next pages Read More