Individual Rights and the Common Good: A Conflicting or Harmonious Relationship? Name of of Professor Introduction The issue of the alleged incompatibility between individual rights and the greater good or the good of the larger society has been one of the most seriously and repeatedly debated in contemporary life; the very issue contrarily interpreted by Ayn Rand and Emmanuel Mesthene…
Download file to see previous pages...
This essay argues that individual rights and the common good can be reconciled; that it would be disastrous to adhere to only one principle. For instance, some claim that the authority bestowed upon individuals by private property rights is very dangerous to the common good; criminologists claim that protecting the criminals’ individual rights is endangering the common good by letting criminals walk; advocates who are focused on the overall moral environment of the society claim that protecting the rights of individuals to take unsafe drugs will certainly challenge public moral standards, whereas others, who are interested in the market’s ethical standing, generally conveys displeasure with the right to freedom of trade and commerce, declaring that these sorts of freedom set free the forces of insatiability, greed, and materialism to the detriment of unity, peace, and civility. Reconciling Individual Rights and the Common Good The restriction of individual rights seldom takes place without asserting or demanding some public value from it. And leading scholars, such as Mesthene, and governing political forces use this public value to justify their agenda of restricting individual rights. However, the key questions are, should it have to be this way? Should individual rights go against the common good? Without a doubt, those who support the natural rights of individuals refuse to believe so. It was exactly to prove the harmony between individual rights and the development of the community. John Locke would definitely disagree that there should be a battle between these two principles. Indeed, the disagreement arises from a fundamental misinterpretation. This includes believing that the community is far from being “a community of human individuals who share certain community concerns which will best be served if each individual has his or her rights fully protected” (Machan, 1998, 154). The argument is that human nature brings people together into one community and establishes principles by which society could be completely unified, at least in theory. This is the very argument supported by natural rights scholars-- that the common good is most successfully protected by awarding each individual prerogative. Within such prerogative every individual is in all likelihood be able to achieve the best s/he can, bringing about the little or no damage in the process, for by denying individuals the power to meddle in other people’s business, the damage or immortality they do will almost certainly harm only them. This will absolutely work as dissuasion to misbehavior, which, consequently, generates benefits to the larger society. Even those scholars, who thought that preferably the most appropriate course of action for all individuals is to work for the society, also thought that the common good could be gained by means of private avarice, as long as specific ideals of liberty are respected. Even ancient philosophers, such as Aristotle, claimed that private property rights would benefit the common welfare. As stated by Aristotle (Machan, 2004, 73): That all persons call the same thing mine is the sense in which each does so may be a fine thing, but it is impracticable; or if the words are taken in the other sense, such a unity in no way conduces to harmony. And there is another objection to the proposal. For that
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Technology ,Rights, Value and Free society Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/design-technology/1493321-technology-rights-value-and-free-society
(Technology ,Rights, Value and Free Society Essay)
“Technology ,Rights, Value and Free Society Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/design-technology/1493321-technology-rights-value-and-free-society.
The First Amendment effectively guarantees free speech, freedom of the press and religion. The constitutional right to free speech gives us the freedom to think and express those thoughts without governmental reproach. Without the free speech, America would be a much different place.
Education does not only help an individual to live a better life but also it has a spillover effect on the society as a whole (Eggleston, 2001). By creating equal opportunities to access education for everyone, all the individuals get a chance to succeed and progress in life.
The question that did cause a lot of discussion pertained to whether this concept has taken into perspective the value of this concept in societies that have not culturally evolved to the level of acceptance of a high technology. There is no denying that the article at the outset makes it clear that there are societies that do not let technologies enter or define its used based on its cultural values.
The U.N fights for Internet rights by declaring them as a human right for the universe to be able to access basic information and communication services (Hayes 98). Use of Internet around the world has grown rapidly due to the market saturation and growth of industrialized countries.
From the youngest to the oldest, technology is a ringing bell that continues to affect and meddle in the challenges and opportunities of life.
The consequences of new technology researches has brought everyone to the open field of knowledge and wisdom extending it to other possibilities of further improvements and developments of other inventions and/or researches.
The mode of presentation of an individual to the others entails the social construction of reality. This presentation has been found not only to be influenced by an individual’s beliefs and experiences but also the interactions with
The conclusion from this review states that people are forced to perceive or do things the way the society demands but not the way they feel. If at all the society could be free then there could be no trouble doing things that were done at the beginning of civilization or conforming to things that they feel is not right or had been set by others.
The chapter is divided into three sections including the introduction section in which the author discusses technological advancements and the impact of this technological advancement. In the next section the author focuses on the definition of technology and tries to
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Technology ,Rights, Value and Free society for FREE!