Nobody downloaded yet

From Empiricism to Postmodernism - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The researcher of this essay aims to explore Empiricism to Postmodernism. By the end of the modern era, a new tradition stepped into the scene. This was called postmodernism. Postmodernism, on the other hand, serves as a critique of the modern project…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.5% of users find it useful
From Empiricism to Postmodernism
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "From Empiricism to Postmodernism"

Download file to see previous pages The essay "From Empiricism to Postmodernism" states Empiricism and Postmodernism. The nature of knowledge has evolved throughout history. During the modern period, that is “since the 17th century scientific revolution and the Enlightenment, we have assumed there is a single objective reality, and science and reason offer the most effective method of discovering it”. This was highlighted during two modern philosophical traditions, i.e. rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism, which began with Rene Descartes, claimed that knowledge stems from reason alone. However, by the time John Locke came into the scene, the nature of knowledge began to shift towards the empiricism. This was at its peak with the empiricist, David Hume. Contrary to rationalism, empiricism claims that knowledge stem from our experience alone. What we can know is that which we can perceive and experience through our senses. Nevertheless, despite the contrast between these two traditions, both characterized knowledge as something structured. It both aimed towards an objective truth, which serves as the foundation of all knowledge. However, by the end of the modern era, a new tradition stepped into the scene. This was called postmodernism. Postmodernism, on the other hand, serves as a critique of the modern project. While modernism emphasized on structure, postmodernism emphasized on de-structuralizing knowledge. The new movement implies a shift from the signified to the signifier: and so there is a perpetual detour on the way to a truth. that has lost any status or finality” (Sarup 1993, p.3). Postmodernism deconstructs foundational concepts such as causality, identity, truth and knowledge. Postmodernists attack the view that there is a single unified body of knowledge. Rather, knowledge, for postmodernists, is relative. There is no single truth so to speak but a multiplicity of truths. It argues that “the human subject does not have a unified consciousness but is structured by language” (Sarup 1993, p.3). In this paper, I shall focus on two philosophical traditions that have shaped the way by which we perceive reality, i.e. empiricism and postmodernism. I shall show how these two traditions differ in their epistemological approaches. In doing so, I shall argue that postmodernism does not serve to give us a clear picture of knowledge. Thus, if philosophy, in its epistemological concerns, aims to search for foundations of our knowledge, then so it seems that postmodernism contradicts the very nature of philosophy in its goal to achieve a reliable and foundational theory of knowledge. Therefore, although empiricism relied too much on observable facts, it nevertheless gave us a consistent theory of knowledge, as opposed to the postmodernist epistemological approach. Given the aforementioned background, I shall divide this paper into three main parts. The first part will discuss the empiricist tradition with regards to its epistemological approaches, while the second part will discuss the postmodernist approach. Here, I shall emphasize on the difference between the manner by which both traditions define the nature and acquisition of knowledge. Finally, the third part will be devoted to my analysis regarding the issue at hand. This will serve as my conclusion. In this final section, I shall give my argument on what I believe is the more consistent and reliable framework for epistemology. In doing so, I shall defend the empiricist view on epistemology as that which upholds rather then rejects the nature of philosophy. For, structure is a necessary factor in any theory of knowledge. Postmodernism deconstructs this structure of knowledge that philosophers, since the ancient period have developed. I shall argue that postmodernism dissolves the very nature of knowledge, and this nullifies the nature of philosophy itself. Postmodernism only serves as a critique to empiricism, but it does not suffice to create a reliable framework of a theory of knowledge, that is, of epistemology. Empiricism and Epistemology There are four ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“From Empiricism to Postmodernism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(From Empiricism to Postmodernism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words)
“From Empiricism to Postmodernism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF From Empiricism to Postmodernism


...Postmodernism Sherman Alexie has extensively explored postmodernism in his narrative ‘Do not gentle’. It is relatively hard to define the word postmodernism when used independently. The definition can differ from culture to culture, society to society, or even race to race. In view of Sherman, postmodernism is change brought about by the influence of television and pop culture, and computer and other technologies. This paper analyzes the elements of fiction used in ‘Do not go gentle’ by Sherman Alexie that portray her as a postmodern writer (Schaffer 123). Setting The setting the narrator chooses is a perfect match to postmodernism. The...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Rationalism and Empiricism

...Explain the difference between Rationalism and Empiricism? Give an example of a  philosopher who is a rationalist and one who is an empiricist. Explicitly contradicting the emphasis on sense-based experience which the Aristotelian school of thought proposed, Descartes presents his argument for rationalism by executing around relations of ideas. Since an a priori knowledge is essential to rationalists, conceptions of philosophy ought to be formulated in the context of logical rationalization or one that is carried out via deductive cognition. Descartes, hence, substantiates his perspective of rationalism with a series of cognitive exercises as indicated by his program on ‘Meditations’ whereby a rational meditator is...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Rationalism And Empiricism

...Rationalism And Empiricism THESIS STATEMENT The main aim of the essay will be to gather a deeper understanding in relation to the concerned concepts i.e. prior and the posteriori knowledge. In addition, the essay aims to identify the implications of both the knowledge processes in the physical world. ARGUMENTS RELATED TO THE DISCUSSION In order to render an in-depth argumentative perspective pertaining to the terms prior and Posteriori knowledge along with epistemology, different viewpoints will be studied. The terms prior and posteriori are essentially used in the field of philosophy. These concepts are a fundamental part of knowledge that shares different meanings (Lawhead 1-80).A Priori knowledge is a process of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...Empiricism Introduction The empiricists in general have tendencies which contrast with those of the rationalists. Empiricists hold that all the material for knowledge, our ideas or concepts, and all knowledge of actual matters of fact, as opposed to logical or conceptual truths, must be derived from, or are reducible to, aspects of our experience: features of the information provided by the content of our senses and introspection. Empiricists deny that it is possible to know by reason alone the nature of what exists; rather, the nature of what exists can be known only through experience. We should reject as meaningless ideas or concepts which cannot be specified as corresponding to any possible experiences. We should...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay


...'Postmodernism threatens the very possibility of an emancipatory social science'. Critically discuss. Support your answer by drawing upon one or more examples of contemporary social theory The idea that one paradigm can in one way or another "threaten" the possibility of another is controversial. The same might be said of the a push for an "emancipatory" social science as the word 'science' tends to imply an objective search for the truth (the word stems from the Latin root to know) somehow removed from the push towards certain ends. But like it or not, one part of social science has indeed been linked inexorably with the attempt to 'change' the human social conditions rather than merely to report on what they are. This analysis... will...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Postmodernism Families

...Postmodernism Families It is a matter of fact that nowadays family patterns have changed and expanded as they are more inclusive and less traditional. It means that modern age of industrialization has been replaced by postmodern age resulting in series of changes regarding core family values, everyday life and traditions. Some scientists use the term postmodernism in terms of family relations, whereas in other spheres this term is neglected and paid less attention. Therefore the chapter summarizes the descriptions of the postmodern family and postmodern family therapy. Furthermore, the author provides postmodern family role to better understand their current way of life. (Hartman 1995) It is apparent that the everyday life... in the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay


...these very senses that man have come to know the world around him, and all the things in it. This is the basic premise of empiricism, which states that: …a theory of knowledge, which emphasizes those aspects of scientific knowledge that are closely related to experience, especially formed through deliberate experimental arrangements (Wikipedia, 2006). Everything that man learns is the product of his experience. David Hume regarded lively and strong as experiences and perceptions. On the other hand, he defined less lively events as beliefs or thoughts. This could explain the fact that people have learned to define and appreciate the very essence of love, happiness, sadness, and loneliness. Love and happiness are often...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Rationalism empiricism

...concept thesis is variable to whatever concepts one claims to be innate while the innate knowledge theory is through the rational human nature rather not claim. 6. What is the Empiricism Thesis? It states that there is no source of knowledge used in, S, other than experience as the source. 7. What is the difference between Descartes’ defense of the Intuition / Deduction Thesis, and Leibniz’s defense of it? Descartes argues that in order for true knowledge one has to have certainty, and certainty of the external world is not what one can prove through empirical methods, while Leibniz argues that the knowledge of some particular world truths appeals to what we know rather than the nature of knowledge therefore this...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Dictionary of terms: Empiricism

... Empiricism The term empiricism comes from Greek word empieria, which refers to experience. Thus, empiricism is a theory advancing that the only source of knowledge is experience. Therefore, it discards the idea that human beings obtain knowledge through reason and thus through rationalism (Sellars, Robert, & Richard 23). It stresses on the function of evidence and experience in the creation of ideas. According to Aristotle, experience is the unorganized product or outcome of memory and sense perception. The theory holds that people with a lot of experience are knowledgeable compared to individuals with little experience. Such experience is stored in our brains and constitutes memories of happenings and events. However, in order... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Rationalism and empiricism

...Rationalism and Empiricism in Philosophy Introduction and Epistemology In the context of philosophy, there is an inherent nature of human beings to search for knowledge. Typically, human beings employ diverse approaches in searching for truth relating to various aspects of life. In this regard, the term ‘Epistemology’ refers to the wide variety of methods used in acquisition of knowledge. Commonly, epistemology is referred to as the theory of knowledge. Epistemology focuses on establishing the connection between knowledge and related notions like justification and belief systems. In this case, belief systems involve the development of knowledge through description. On the contrary, justification involves development of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic From Empiricism to Postmodernism for FREE!

Contact Us